Show the ARIA command reference and model guidance for this Codex port. Trigger on /help, aria help, what commands are available, or what can ARIA do.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mikeprasad/aria-knowledge --skill help --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Help?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mikeprasad-help-81c83d8f)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: help
description: "Show the ARIA command reference and model guidance for this Codex port. Trigger on /help, aria help, what commands are available, or what can ARIA do."
argument-hint: ""
allowed-tools:
---
# /help — aria-knowledge Commands
Print the command reference table. No config or file access needed.
## Output
```
## aria-knowledge Commands
| Command | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| /setup | Configure knowledge folder, audit cadences, and plugin settings |
| /extract | Capture insights, decisions, and feedback from the current conversation |
| /audit [knowledge\|config\|style\|all] | Umbrella audit dispatcher — routes to the sub-audit named, or runs all in sequence with no arg |
| /audit-knowledge (alias: /knowledge-audit) | Review backlogs, promote to knowledge files, rebuild index |
| /audit-config (alias: /config-audit) | Check project configs and docs for drift and broken references |
| /audit style | Log-mining audit over session transcripts for revealed working-style rules (opt-in — not part of routine cadence) |
| /audit-share | Promote personal knowledge to the team-shared `_project-knowledge/` tier |
| /prospect [plan/session/todos/file/linear/branch] | Forward-looking pre-mortem on a plan before any code — per-step risk verdicts (PROCEED/SHRINK/SPLIT/DEFER/KILL), evidence-sourcing pass, simpler-alternative discipline |
| /preflight [ticket/file] | Executed pre-completion checklist run just before you claim done — six checks (requirements diff, consumer census, reachability, census bound, non-vacuity, mutation), three outcomes each; an unrun check blocks the verdict |
| /retrospect [--range/--pr/--session/--commit] | Structured retrospective on a shipped commit range — per-fix validation, simpler-alternative discipline, re-diagnosis, action verdicts, failure-mode pattern check |
| /recap [arc\|commit\|push\|pull] | Read-only orientation — a scannable What/Where/Status table of recent work (this session by default; or the last arc/commit/push/pull). Summarizes, never validates; writes nothing |
| /roadmap [<name>\|refresh] | Per-project feature roadmap — a Feature/Band/Status grid (Shipped/Current/Next/Later × done/in-progress/blocked/buildable) synthesized from CLAUDE.md + PROGRESS.md, persisted to a committed ROADMAP.md with staleness-aware refresh. Renders + offers refresh when stale; never auto-commits |
| /foundational-review <scope-root> [--decision "..."] [--extend] | Foundational review chain before an irreversible decision (freeze/tag/flip/re-scope): verdict + premises + A–F → design spec → cold-executable plan → composed /prospect → kickoff. Requires a named irreversible decision (else redirects). |
| /readiness-audit <scope-root> [--for "<event>"] | Surface readiness audit (sibling of /foundational-review): parallel exploration → controller re-verification of agent claims → tiered evidence-celled findings → phased remediation. Read-only probes; no decision anchor needed. |
| /context [tags] | Load relevant knowledge files by topic (supports AND/OR, project expansion) |
| /index | Rebuild the tag-based knowledge index with cross-references |
| /rules [number] | Look up a working rule by number or keyword |
| /backlog [type] | View and manage pending intake items |
| /stats | Knowledge base health dashboard — file counts, backlogs, audit status |
| /ask [question] | Research a question, check existing knowledge, save answer as a knowledge doc |
| /intake [url or text] | Clip a single URL/snippet whole → intake/clippings/ (reviewed at next /audit-knowledge) |
| /intake [path or dir or glob] | Bulk import knowledge from files, directories, or globs into the backlogs |
| /intake extract [source] | Decompose a source (URL/file/doc via ~~docs MCP) into backlog entries |
| /intake doc [url or title] | Capture a single doc with 5-section structured body (claims/keeping/contested/action/reaction) → intake/docs/ |
| /intake thread [id] | Pull a chat/email thread via ~~chat/~~email MCP → intake/clippings/ |
| /interview <mode> | Elicit knowledge via dialogue (project / knowledge / deep-dive); chooses cadence in-session; stages to intake/ for manual review |
| /codemap [mode] | Feature-organized CODEMAP.md for any codebase (create/inventory/update/section) |
| /distill [text or path] | Tiered task spec from raw text; optional --group for CODEMAP-loaded context |
| /stitch <mode> <group> | Cross-repo binding (auth/endpoints/entities/drift) for a product group |
| /wrapup [auto\|snap] | End-of-session close-out — update PROGRESS/CLAUDE.md, prompt for commit, verify continuity. `auto` runs silently; `snap` runs like auto but archives the transcript via /snapshot for later extraction instead of /extract (use when context is high) |
| /handoff [auto\|brief\|snap] | Express handoff — same coverage as /wrapup, one combined-go review (or `auto` for silent), always emits a paste-ready next-session opener. `brief` mode produces a copy/paste coworker brief (Hey [coworker]-style prose, 80-150 words) instead of next-session opener — no PROGRESS/CLAUDE/memory/commit/extract side effects. `snap` mode runs like auto but archives the transcript via /snapshot for later extraction instead of /extract (use when context is high) |
| /snapshot | Save the current session transcript to intake/pre-compact-captures/ on demand |
| /aria-assist [generate\|review] | Manual product-management review across configured projects; Codex does not bundle the Claude Code scheduler/notifier helpers |
| /help | This command reference |
Run /setup to configure. See QUICKSTART.md for a walkthrough of your first 3 sessions.
## Model Recommendations
These are recommendations only — ARIA does not force a model. Switch per session via `/model` based on the skill you're about to run.
| Skill | Recommended Model | Why |
|-------|-------------------|-----|
| /extract | Highest-capability Opus, medium-to-high effort | Judgment-heavy: distinguishing reusable signal from ephemeral noise, writing non-obvious Why/How-to-apply lines. |
| /audit-knowledge | Highest-capability Opus, medium-to-high effort | Cross-references backlogs against the promoted index, decides promotion vs. discard, detects emerging themes. |
| /audit-config | Highest-capability Opus, medium-to-high effort | Reads across CLAUDE.md files and configs to detect drift and broken references. |
| /preflight | Whatever model is doing the work — no escalation | Deliberately runnable at any tier. The checks are mechanical (census, importers, call counts, mutation); escalating the model would imply the gate is a judgment call, and its whole premise is that judgment already failed once. |
| /retrospect | Highest-capability Opus, medium-to-high effort | Multi-stage judgment per fix: validation status assignment, simpler-alternative identification, hypothesis generation, failure-mode pattern matching, action verdict synthesis. Highest leverage from stronger models. |
| /foundational-review, /readiness-audit | Highest-ceiling available (Fable at extreme stakes, else Opus), xhigh effort | The reviewer model is spent on alternatives-steelmanning, portfolio/product judgment, and the irreversibility inventory; semi-agentic read-trace-reason loop benefits from xhigh. Executor tasks the chain emits route to Opus by default. |
| /ask | Highest-capability Opus, medium-to-high effort (ambiguous topics) or Sonnet (mid-tier) for scoped lookups | Research + draft + categorize. Drop to Sonnet when the question is narrow. |
| /interview | Highest-capability Opus for deep-dive (ambiguous, evidence-cited, leverage-clustered question generation) or Sonnet (mid-tier) for focused guided project/knowledge runs | Deep-dive is judgment-heavy (cite evidence, cluster by leverage, hunt negative space) and re-deriving after every guided dialog compounds that; focused elicitation is lighter. Spans tiers like /ask. |
| /codemap create | Highest-capability Opus (large-context variant preferred) | Full-repo traversal benefits from a large context window so sections aren't truncated mid-generation. |
| /codemap update, /codemap section, /wrapup, /handoff, /intake, /distill, /stitch | Sonnet (mid-tier), medium effort | Structured work with clear prescribed output. |
| /index, /stats, /backlog, /rules, /context, /intake, /snapshot, /aria-assist, /help, /setup | Sonnet (mid-tier), low effort | Mechanical or retrieval-only — higher models add no measurable lift. |
Always pick the latest release within each tier — ARIA pins capability *tiers*, not version numbers, so this guidance survives model updates.
`Fable` (displayed "Fable 5") is the tier above Opus. Its edge is raw capability/judgment, **not** context size — Fable and Opus share the same 1M-token window. Treat it as a step-up only for the most judgment-heavy, high-stakes runs where a wrong or shallow answer is costly (`/extract`, `/audit-knowledge`, `/retrospect` on genuinely hard sessions). It costs ~2× Opus, so reach for it when difficulty — not data volume — justifies the spend; the Opus rows otherwise stand. (Note: the "large-context variant preferred" qualifier on `/codemap create` above is legacy — any current top-tier model, Opus 4.8 included, already carries the 1M window, so full-repo traversal no longer needs a special variant.)
Any model below Sonnet-equivalent capability is not recommended for any ARIA skill — the judgment/cross-reference demands exceed its strengths.
The honest test: will a stronger model change what ends up in the knowledge base? For `/extract` and `/audit-knowledge`, yes, measurably. For `/index` and `/stats`, no.
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!