Audit evidence collection and trail verification. Gathers artifacts,
validates controls, generates audit reports, and maintains compliance
documentation.
Use when: "audit trail", "collect evidence", "audit report",
"control testing", "compliance documentation", "gather audit evidence for
SOC2/HIPAA/GDPR/PCI", or any former /wicked-garden:platform:audit
invocation. NOT for defining compliance policies (use the compliance
sub-skill) or ad hoc security checks (use the platform domain skill's
se...
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mikeparcewski-audit)
---
name: wicked-garden-platform-audit
description: |
Audit evidence collection and trail verification. Gathers artifacts,
validates controls, generates audit reports, and maintains compliance
documentation.
Use when: "audit trail", "collect evidence", "audit report",
"control testing", "compliance documentation", "gather audit evidence for
SOC2/HIPAA/GDPR/PCI", or any former /wicked-garden:platform:audit
invocation. NOT for defining compliance policies (use the compliance
sub-skill) or ad hoc security checks (use the platform domain skill's
security action).
metadata:
role: module
phases: "build,review,operate"
archetypes: "*"
---
# Audit Skill
Collect evidence and verify audit trails for compliance.
## Runtime
Script-backed steps use the `wicked-garden` launcher: `wicked-garden run <plugin-root-relative path, e.g. scripts/…> [args]`. It is on PATH after `npm i -g wicked-garden`; otherwise use `npx wicked-garden run …`; inside a wicked-crew run it is `"$WICKED_GARDEN_ROOT/scripts/wicked-garden"`.
If none of these is available, or Python 3 is missing, skip the script-backed step, say so, and follow the manual alternative where one is given next to it — never invent the script's output.
Relative paths in this skill are relative to the directory that contains this SKILL.md.
## When to Use
- Preparing for external audit
- Collecting evidence for compliance certification
- Verifying audit trail completeness
- Generating audit reports
- User says "audit", "evidence", "audit trail", "control testing"
## Run it inline (no dispatch)
Invoked as `<framework> [control_id|all]`:
1. Parse args: `<framework> [control_id]` (framework = `soc2|hipaa|gdpr|pci`;
control_id or `all`).
2. Read `refs/audit.md` (relative to this skill's base directory) — full
collection rubric, control-testing checklist, SOC2/HIPAA control matrix,
gap analysis, bus emit, and output format.
3. For framework-specific checklists:
Read `refs/checklists-soc2-hipaa.md`
or `refs/checklists-gdpr-pci-evidence.md`. For evidence scripts and
organization: `refs/checklists-evidence-operations.md`.
4. Apply the rubric directly: collect evidence via code search, verify each
control, document Pass/Partial/Fail with file:line refs, then emit the bus
event and produce the audit report.
## Audit Process
### 1. Define Scope
Identify audit targets:
- Code components
- Data flows
- Access controls
- Infrastructure
- Processes
### 2. Collect Evidence
**Code Evidence**:
- Access control implementation
- Encryption usage
- Input validation
- Error handling
- Logging statements
**Configuration Evidence**:
- TLS/SSL settings
- Database encryption
- Key management
- Network policies
- IAM roles
**Documentation Evidence**:
- Architecture diagrams
- Data flow diagrams
- Security policies
- Incident response plans
**Operational Evidence**:
- Access logs
- Audit logs
- Security events
- Change logs
See [refs/checklists-soc2-hipaa.md](refs/checklists-soc2-hipaa.md), [refs/checklists-gdpr-pci-evidence.md](refs/checklists-gdpr-pci-evidence.md), and [refs/checklists-evidence-operations.md](refs/checklists-evidence-operations.md) for comprehensive evidence checklists.
### 3. Verify Controls
Test each control:
```bash
# Check encryption
grep -r "encrypt\|cipher\|AES\|TLS" {target}
# Check access controls
grep -r "authorize\|authenticate\|require.*auth" {target}
# Check audit logging
grep -r "log\|audit\|event" {target}
```
See [refs/frameworks-soc2-hipaa.md](refs/frameworks-soc2-hipaa.md) and [refs/frameworks-gdpr-pci.md](refs/frameworks-gdpr-pci.md) for framework-specific control testing procedures.
### 4. Document Gaps
Identify:
- Controls without evidence
- Incomplete audit trails
- Missing documentation
- Configuration gaps
### 5. Generate Report
Create report with:
- Controls tested
- Evidence collected
- Gaps identified
- Recommendations
- Risk assessment
## Evidence Types
| Type | Description | Examples |
|------|-------------|----------|
| **Design** | Architecture | Diagrams, specs, policies |
| **Implementation** | Code | Functions, configs, tests |
| **Operational** | Runtime | Logs, metrics, incidents |
| **Process** | Procedural | Approvals, reviews, training |
## Integration
### With the harness's task list
Attach audit evidence by appending `## Audit Evidence: {control_id} — Evidence file: {evidence_path}` to the task description (reference file paths checked into the repo) — the harness's task list where it has one (the `wicked-garden-workflow` skill's `refs/integration.md` carries the field list and the harness-specific Hand-off), else your working notes.
### With the knowledge layer
**Hand-off** — open the `wicked-garden-mem` skill and run its `recall` action with `audit logging encryption` as the query (FTS5 over indexed code); on Claude Code this is the Skill tool, on any other seat open the named skill from your catalog and carry it out inline, then continue here.
## Output Format
```markdown
## Audit Report: {Framework}
**Status**: {READY|NEEDS WORK|NOT READY}
**Controls Tested**: {count} | **Gaps**: {count}
### Controls Tested
| ID | Status | Evidence |
|----|--------|----------|
| CC6.1 | PASS | auth.py:15 |
| CC7.2 | FAIL | Missing |
### Evidence
- Design: docs/arch.md
- Code: src/auth.py, src/crypto.py
- Operational: /var/log/audit.log
### Critical Gaps (P0)
1. Missing admin audit trail
2. No TLS for PII endpoints
### Recommendations
1. Fix P0 gaps before certification
2. Schedule follow-up audit
```
## Quality Standards
Good audit evidence:
- Specific file/line references
- Clear control mapping
- Complete artifact trails
- Risk-prioritized gaps
Bad audit evidence:
- Generic statements
- No source references
- Missing artifacts