Validate messaging consistency across website, GitHub repos, and local documentation generating read-only discrepancy reports. Use when checking content alignment or finding mixed messaging. Trigger with phrases like "check consistency", "validate documentation", or "audit messaging".
Scanned 9/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add micsapp/micstec-skills --skill 000-jeremy-content-consistency-validator --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of 000 Jeremy Content Consistency Validator?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/micsapp-000-jeremy-content-consistency-validator)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: 000-jeremy-content-consistency-validator
description: |
Validate messaging consistency across website, GitHub repos, and local documentation generating read-only discrepancy reports. Use when checking content alignment or finding mixed messaging. Trigger with phrases like "check consistency", "validate documentation", or "audit messaging".
allowed-tools: Read, WebFetch, WebSearch, Grep, Bash(diff:*), Bash(grep:*)
version: 1.0.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
compatible-with: claude-code, codex, openclaw
---
# Content Consistency Validator
## Overview
Checks content for tone, terminology, formatting, and structural consistency across multiple documentation sources (websites, GitHub repos, local docs). Generates read-only discrepancy reports with severity-classified findings and actionable fix suggestions including file paths and line numbers.
## Examples
- **Pre-release audit**: Before tagging a new version, run the validator to catch version mismatches between your README, docs site, and changelog — e.g., the website says v2.1.0 but the GitHub README still references v2.0.0.
- **Post-rebrand check**: After renaming a product or updating terminology (e.g., "plugin" to "extension"), validate that all docs, landing pages, and contributing guides use the new term consistently.
- **Onboarding review**: When a new contributor flags confusing docs, run a consistency check to surface contradictory feature claims, outdated contact info, or missing sections across your documentation sources.
## Prerequisites
- Access to at least two content sources (website, GitHub repo, or local docs directory)
- WebFetch permissions configured for remote URLs (deployed sites, GitHub raw content)
- Local documentation stored in recognizable paths (`docs/`, `claudes-docs/`, `internal/`)
## Instructions
1. **Discover sources** — scan for build directories (`dist/`, `build/`, `public/`, `out/`, `_site/`), GitHub README/CONTRIBUTING files, and local doc folders:
```bash
find . -maxdepth 3 -name "README*" -o -name "CONTRIBUTING*" | head -20
ls -d docs/ claudes-docs/ internal/ 2>/dev/null
```
2. **Extract structured data** from each source: version numbers, feature claims, product names, taglines, contact info, URLs, and technical requirements:
```bash
grep -rn 'v[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+' docs/ README.md
grep -rn -i 'features\|capabilities' docs/ README.md
```
3. **Verify extraction** — confirm at least 3 data points per source. If a source returns empty, check the Error Handling table before continuing.
4. **Build comparison matrix** pairing each source against every other (website vs GitHub, website vs local docs, GitHub vs local docs):
```bash
diff <(grep -i 'version' README.md) <(grep -i 'version' docs/overview.md)
```
5. **Classify discrepancies** by severity:
- **Critical**: conflicting version numbers, contradictory feature lists, mismatched contact info, broken cross-references
- **Warning**: inconsistent terminology (e.g., "plugin" vs "extension"), missing information in one source, outdated dates
- **Informational**: stylistic differences, platform-specific wording, differing detail levels
6. **Apply trust priority**: website (most authoritative) > GitHub (developer-facing) > local docs (internal use).
7. **Generate report** as Markdown with: executive summary, per-pair comparison tables, terminology consistency matrix, and prioritized action items with file paths and line numbers.
8. **Save** to `consistency-reports/YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM-SS.md`.
## Report Format
```markdown
# Consistency Report — YYYY-MM-DD
## Executive Summary
| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Critical | 2 |
| Warning | 5 |
| Info | 3 |
## Website vs GitHub
| Field | Website | GitHub | Severity |
|-------------|---------------|---------------|----------|
| Version | v2.1.0 | v2.0.0 | Critical |
| Feature X | listed | missing | Warning |
## Action Items
1. **Critical** — Update `README.md:14` version from v2.0.0 → v2.1.0
2. **Warning** — Add "Feature X" to `README.md` feature list
```
## Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| Website content unreachable | URL returns 4xx/5xx or build dir missing | Verify site is deployed or run local build; check WebFetch permissions |
| GitHub API rate limit | Too many fetches in short window | Pause and retry after reset window; use authenticated requests |
| No documentation directory | Expected paths don't exist | Confirm working directory; specify doc path explicitly |
| Empty content extraction | Client-side rendering not visible to fetch | Use local build output directory instead of live URL |
| Diff command failure | File paths contain special characters | Quote all file paths passed to diff and grep |
## Resources
- Content source discovery logic: `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/how-it-works.md`
- Trust priority and validation timing: `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/best-practices.md`
- Use-case walkthroughs: `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/example-use-cases.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!