Turn specs and a progress audit into an exhaustive, structured backlog of the remaining work — each item with a short rationale, a concrete plan, the engineering rules that apply, a matched tracker ticket (or "create one"), dependencies, and any approval gate. Use when scoping what's left, building a completion/roadmap plan, or checking which work is missing from the tracker.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add me-cedric/agent-compass --skill completion-plan --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Completion Plan?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/me-cedric-completion-plan)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: completion-plan
description: >
Turn specs and a progress audit into an exhaustive, structured backlog of the
remaining work — each item with a short rationale, a concrete plan, the
engineering rules that apply, a matched tracker ticket (or "create one"),
dependencies, and any approval gate. Use when scoping what's left, building a
completion/roadmap plan, or checking which work is missing from the tracker.
risk_level: low
writes_files: false
requires_tools: []
---
# Completion Plan
Convert "what's missing" into an ordered, actionable backlog a team or agent can
execute — grounded in the repo's real conventions.
## When to use
- Scoping the remaining work to finish a project, domain, or milestone.
- Building a completion plan / roadmap / technical vision of what's left.
- Reconciling a backlog/tracker against the specs — finding untracked work.
- After `progress-audit`; before `work-splitting` or `implementation-planning`.
## Method
1. **Start from the gaps.** Use the audit's per-subfeature "missing" findings (or
the specs directly) as the raw backlog.
2. **Read the repo's conventions first** — its module patterns, resilience,
security, contract-sync, testing, and env rules — so every item's plan and
"rules" reference the *actual* standards, not generic advice.
3. **Write work-items.** One coherent unit of work each (not per line, not per
whole feature). For each: id, title, feature(s), priority/tier, *what it is
and why*, a concrete plan (real files/endpoints/tables/jobs), the specific
engineering rules that apply, the matched tracker ticket (or `NO TICKET —
create`), dependencies, and any gate.
4. **Order by dependency and priority tier** (foundation → then tiers). Surface
the critical-path foundations everything else consumes.
5. **Report the tracker delta** — list real deliverables with no ticket so they
can be created.
## Run at scale
Fan out **one sub-agent per domain**, each reading its gap slice + the tracker +
the repo conventions + current code, returning **structured work-items**. Then
reconcile cross-cutting items into a single "foundation" section and dedupe.
## Output
- An ordered backlog document, grouped by tier/domain, each item build-ready.
- A "missing from the tracker" list (tickets to create).
- A gate register: each blocked item, what unblocks it, who approves.
- Hand items to `work-splitting` (to assign) or `implementation-planning` (to detail).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!