Rfq Tender Response

---
name: rfq-tender-response
description: "Veteran playbook for freight RFQ/RFP/tender response — RFQ vs RFP vs RFI, the qualify-or-decline scorecard, the four operational drivers of quote win-rate (speed, accuracy, optionality, margin consistency), the lane rate-matrix format, the bid-narrative structure, give-get on price, and follow-up cadence. Consulted by rfq-tender-strategist."
---

# RFQ / Tender Response Skill

**Purpose:** help `rfq-tender-strategist` decide which tenders to chase and turn a worth-it one into a winnable, well-structured response. Qualify hard; respond on value, not price alone.

## When to use
- A new RFQ/RFP/tender lands and you must decide bid/no-bid.
- Structuring a multi-lane response.
- Diagnosing a low quote win-rate.

## 1. RFQ vs RFP vs RFI
- **RFQ (Request for Quote):** specs fixed, **price-led**. Compete on all-in rate + reliability + speed. The buyer will compare numbers — make yours comparable and surcharge-inclusive.
- **RFP (Request for Proposal):** **solution-led** — evaluated on methodology, network, SLAs, implementation, references. Compete on design and fit; price is one criterion among several.
- **RFI (Request for Information):** early intel-gathering, **not yet a bid**. Respond lean; don't over-invest. Use it to get on the shortlist and learn the criteria.

## 2. Qualify-or-decline scorecard (before pricing)
Score each, then decide. Low total → decline politely and stay on the list.

| Factor | Strong (bid) | Weak (lean decline) |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic fit (lanes/modes we're good at) | core lanes, our strength | off-network, weak coverage |
| Volume reality | verified, material | vague, possibly a price-check |
| Incumbent strength | weak/unhappy incumbent, clear switch reason | entrenched, no reason to move |
| Our relationships | multi-threaded, a champion | single contact or none (high risk) |
| Winnable economics | we can price to win at acceptable margin | only winnable at a loss |
| Decision criteria clarity | criteria + timeline known | opaque ("we'll see") |
| Resourcing to deliver | we can onboard/operate it | would strain ops |

**Decline well:** a fast, reasoned, relationship-preserving "no" returns the week to winnable bids and keeps you on the next list.

## 3. The four operational drivers of win-rate
Forwarders who do these win a structurally higher share:
1. **Speed** — quote back fast. A surcharge-inclusive quote returned quickly beats a perfect quote returned slow.
2. **Accuracy** — surcharge-inclusive, error-free; a quote that grows on the invoice destroys trust and the renewal.
3. **Carrier/routing optionality** — multiple carriers/routings, not a single dependency.
4. **Margin consistency** — a disciplined, consistent margin across the team, not ad-hoc heroics.

When win-rate is low, diagnose against these four first — it's usually speed or accuracy, not price.

## 4. Lane rate matrix
One row per lane, comparable and auditable:

`POL → POD | mode | equipment/basis | volume | transit | base | surcharge stack | all-in | validity | assumptions`

Keep assumptions explicit per lane (Incoterm scope, equipment, free time). This is what the buyer scores; make it easy.

## 5. Bid narrative (the non-price win)
Executive summary → understanding of their supply chain → the solution (network, lanes, visibility/track-trace, KPIs/SLAs, exception handling) → why us (reliability + problem-solving **proof**, labeled real vs illustrative) → commercials (the matrix) → implementation/onboarding plan → references. The narrative wins the points the rate matrix can't.

## 6. Give-get on price
Never discount naked. Trade price for: volume commitment, longer term, mode shift (air→sea), lane consolidation, scope addition (customs, warehousing), or faster payment terms. Every concession buys something.

## 7. Follow-up cadence
Receipt confirmation → a clarification/value touch (a lane insight) → a decision-timeline check → a post-decision debrief (win **or** lose — losing teaches you the gap). Persistent, not nagging.

## Hand-offs
- Per-lane pricing + surcharge stack → `freight-pricing-mechanics` skill / `freight-rate-quoter`.
- Incumbent-account defense angle → `qbr-account-planning` skill / `key-account-manager`.
- Forecast/coverage impact of the tender → `pipeline-forecasting` skill / `pipeline-forecast-coach`.