Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Renewal Workflow Design

ASecurity

Design the renewal-risk workflow and save-play triggers from a health tier plus renewal proximity: the risk = proximity × engagement rule, the renewal watchlist surface, the trigger-to-play mapping, the expand/maintain/recover decision, and the who-do-I-call-today actionability bar. Reach for this skill when designing how at-risk renewals surface and what fires when, or when a renewal that should be safe shows no movement. Domain-neutral — generalized from the EdTech renewal-play-design patte...

7 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/23/2026
ai-agentsgoreact

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/23/2026

$npx -y skills add mcorbett51090/RavenClaude --skill renewal-workflow-design --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Renewal Workflow Design?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Renewal Workflow Design
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mcorbett51090-renewal-workflow-design/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mcorbett51090-renewal-workflow-design)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: renewal-workflow-design
description: "Design the renewal-risk workflow and save-play triggers from a health tier plus renewal proximity: the risk = proximity × engagement rule, the renewal watchlist surface, the trigger-to-play mapping, the expand/maintain/recover decision, and the who-do-I-call-today actionability bar. Reach for this skill when designing how at-risk renewals surface and what fires when, or when a renewal that should be safe shows no movement. Domain-neutral — generalized from the EdTech renewal-play-design pattern; no vertical assumptions."
---

# Skill: Renewal-Workflow Design

A renewal is earned in the months before the date, not negotiated in the final week. This skill designs the **workflow** that surfaces at-risk renewals early and the **triggers** that fire a save motion while there's still time to act — keyed off the health tier and renewal proximity.

This is the **domain-neutral** generalization of the renewal-play-design pattern — the reusable renewal-risk mechanics, with vertical specifics (K-12 budget cycles, academic calendars, segment overlays) stripped out. Used by `cs-analytics-architect` (designs the renewal surface into the model) and `churn-signal-analyst` (defines the triggers). Pairs with [`../health-tier-design/SKILL.md`](../health-tier-design/SKILL.md).

## The core opinion this skill encodes

> **Renewal proximity alone is not risk. Risk = proximity × engagement.**

Every account eventually reaches 90 days to renewal — that, alone, is not a signal. Proximity is the **gate** that sets urgency; **engagement** (usage trend, health-score trend, support/escalation signal, champion presence) is what turns proximity into risk. The workflow keys off the *product* of the two, never proximity by itself.

A renewal you have to *convince* at T-7 is one you already lost the narrative on. The workflow exists to make the misses visible at T-90 — sponsor never confirmed, value-evidence missing, single-threaded relationship — while there's still runway.

## Step 1 — The renewal watchlist surface

The workflow starts with a surface: accounts whose renewal is inside the watch window, sorted by **risk × proximity**.

- **Entry:** an account enters the watchlist when `days_to_renewal` crosses the watch threshold (default ~180 days).
- **Sort:** by `(health_tier, days_to_renewal)` — Red-and-soon at the top.
- **Per row:** the health tier + **why** (its driving signals), days to renewal, renewal-opportunity stage, recommended next action, and a trend sparkline.
- **The actionability bar:** a CS leader sorts by `(tier = Red AND days_to_renewal < 90)` and gets an actionable call list in under two minutes, every Red showing why. If the surface needs mental computation or shows an unexplained Red, it fails the bar.

## Step 2 — The workflow stages (health-gated)

| Stage | Default timing | The health-gated check |
|---|---|---|
| **Watch** | enters ~180-day window | baseline health tier recorded; account on the watchlist |
| **Confirm** | ~120 days | named decision-maker / sponsor still in role + engaged? value-evidence assembled + sourced? |
| **Multi-thread** | ~90 days | single-threaded to one champion (a single point of failure) or multi-threaded? |
| **Decide** | ~90-60 days | the expand / maintain / recover call (Step 4) |
| **Close** | ~30-7 days | "no surprises" — the account already knows the posture + pricing |

> The day-counts are the default SaaS clock. A vertical overlay (a budget-build window that decides the renewal months early) shifts the *clock*; the stages and their health-gates stay the same. Overlays live in a vertical plugin, not here.

**Missed stages are the leading indicator.** Don't march forward as if a missed milestone happened — a missed confirm / multi-thread is itself a risk flag that should re-tier the account.

## Step 3 — Trigger-to-play mapping (save-play triggers)

Map health-tier states *and* independent red-flag triggers to a save motion. The tier drives the scheduled cadence; the independent triggers fire immediately, regardless of tier color.

| Trigger | Fires |
|---|---|
| Tier = Red AND `days_to_renewal < 90` | Top-of-list save play; frequent review until cleared or resolved |
| Tier flips Green→Yellow | Investigate which signals dropped; light-touch recovery; tighten cadence |
| **Champion / sponsor departs** (independent) | Immediate re-confirm-and-multi-thread motion — don't wait for the next QBR |
| **Active-user collapse** (independent) | Immediate diagnostic + outreach |
| **Account says "evaluating alternatives"** (independent) | Immediate recovery motion + escalation |
| Sponsor skips 2 consecutive reviews (ghost sponsor) | Re-confirm decision-maker; feed silence back into the tier |

Independent triggers run **alongside** the tier, not inside it — a composite reacts too slowly to a sudden champion departure.

## Step 4 — The expand / maintain / recover decision

At the Decide stage the CSM makes an internal call from three inputs — health tier, adoption trajectory, organizational readiness:

| Input | Expand | Maintain | Recover / exit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health tier | Top, stable/rising | Mid, stable | Bottom or declining |
| Adoption | Broad + room to grow | Steady at target | Narrow or declining |
| Org readiness | New budget / sponsor energy | Status quo | Org change against us / sponsor lost |

- **Expand** → trigger the grow motion *after* the renewal closes, never bundled into it.
- **Maintain** → renew and continue at the standard cadence.
- **Recover** → the renewal motion *is* the recovery; fire the save play immediately.

**Anti-pattern:** running an expansion motion on a Yellow/Red account during the renewal window. It conflates the relationship, burns the renewal, and signals the CSM is on quota. (CS is not sales — expansion fires when the account has earned value, not on a calendar quota.)

## Step 5 — Touch-cadence by tier

The tier drives how often, not just who:

| Tier | Cadence |
|---|---|
| **Green** | Standard rhythm (quarterly QBR + light monthly pulse); watch for expansion readiness |
| **Yellow** | Tighter (monthly sync + weekly signal review); light-touch recovery |
| **Red** | Recovery cadence — *not* "wait for the next QBR"; frequent review until cleared |

## Step 6 — QBR discipline (the recurring checkpoint between renewals)

- A QBR with no commitments is a status meeting. Every QBR ends with named action items, owners, and dates — tracked *between* QBRs.
- QBR attendance is a signal: a sponsor skipping two reviews is a ghost sponsor (feeds the tier).
- Provenance on every QBR claim — "usage up 18%" needs source, range, baseline.

## What this skill does NOT cover

- The health tier itself (signal selection, weighting, thresholds, explainability) → [`../health-tier-design/SKILL.md`](../health-tier-design/SKILL.md)
- Building the pipeline / warehouse / BI surface that renders the workflow → `data-platform`
- Segment-specific renewal overlays (K-12 budget cycle, academic calendar, board approval) → a vertical plugin (e.g. `edtech-partner-success`)
- The partner-facing comms / play *execution* in a vertical → a vertical CS-motion plugin

## References

- Knowledge: [`../../knowledge/renewal-and-account-lifecycle.md`](../../knowledge/renewal-and-account-lifecycle.md)
- Companion skill: [`../health-tier-design/SKILL.md`](../health-tier-design/SKILL.md)
- Template: [`../../templates/cs-health-data-model.md`](../../templates/cs-health-data-model.md)
- Generalized from: [`../../../edtech-partner-success/skills/renewal-play-design/SKILL.md`](../../../edtech-partner-success/skills/renewal-play-design/SKILL.md)

Attribution

mcorbett51090mcorbett51090
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from mcorbett51090 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →