Playbook for designing safe-to-retry POST and PATCH operations using Idempotency-Key — covers key format, dedup window, stored-response replay, conflict handling, and OpenAPI declaration.
Scanned 9/23/2026
npx -y skills add mcorbett51090/RavenClaude --skill idempotency-key-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Idempotency Key Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mcorbett51090-idempotency-key-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: idempotency-key-design
description: "Playbook for designing safe-to-retry POST and PATCH operations using Idempotency-Key — covers key format, dedup window, stored-response replay, conflict handling, and OpenAPI declaration."
---
# Idempotency-Key Design
## When to Use This Skill
Any `POST` or `PATCH` that has a side effect the caller must not repeat: charge a card, create an order, send a notification, initiate a transfer. If the client retries on a network timeout, the operation must not execute twice.
## 1. The Contract
```
POST /orders
Idempotency-Key: 550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000
Content-Type: application/json
{ "items": [...], "total": 99.95 }
```
- The header name is `Idempotency-Key` (title-case, per the IETF draft — `[verify-at-build]` on draft status).
- Value: a **client-generated** UUID v4 (or ULID). The server treats it as opaque.
- The server stores the key + response for the dedup window; re-submitting the same key returns the stored response without re-executing.
## 2. Server-Side Design Checklist
| Step | Detail |
|---|---|
| Parse and validate | If header absent on a non-idempotent-by-design endpoint → 422 or proceed without dedup (document which). If header present but malformed → 400. |
| Lock the key | Atomically: check-and-set the key in a store (Redis SETNX, DB upsert). If key already locked and processing → 409 `in-progress`. |
| Execute or replay | Key absent → execute normally, store `(key, status, response_body, expires_at)`. Key present + complete → return stored response with original status. |
| Dedup window | Minimum 24 hours, typically 7 days. Beyond the window, treat as a new request. Document the TTL. |
| Scope | Key is scoped to the **authenticated caller** + **endpoint**. The same key from a different user is a different request. |
## 3. Storage Schema (minimal)
```sql
CREATE TABLE idempotency_keys (
key TEXT NOT NULL,
user_id UUID NOT NULL,
endpoint TEXT NOT NULL,
status SMALLINT NOT NULL,
response JSONB NOT NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
expires_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (key, user_id, endpoint)
);
```
## 4. Response Behaviour Table
| Scenario | Status returned | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| First request, succeeds | 201 or 200 | Store response |
| Retry with same key, completed | Same as first (201/200) | Return stored body |
| Retry with same key, still processing | 409 `in-progress` | `Retry-After` header |
| Key expired, resubmitted | Treat as new request | Document TTL |
| Wrong user submitting same key | Normal processing (different scope) | Keys are user-scoped |
| Key reused for different payload | 422 `idempotency-key-reuse` | Detect via payload hash if desired |
## 5. OpenAPI Declaration
```yaml
/orders:
post:
operationId: createOrder
parameters:
- name: Idempotency-Key
in: header
required: true
schema:
type: string
format: uuid
description: |
Client-generated UUID v4. Safe to retry within 7 days.
Re-submitting the same key returns the stored response.
responses:
"201":
description: Order created
"409":
description: Key in progress or payload mismatch
content:
application/problem+json:
schema:
$ref: "#/components/schemas/Problem"
```
## 6. Client Retry Algorithm
```
1. Generate key = UUID v4; store locally.
2. POST with Idempotency-Key header.
3. On network error or 5xx: wait (exponential backoff + jitter), retry with SAME key.
4. On 409 in-progress: wait Retry-After seconds, retry with SAME key.
5. On 2xx: success.
6. On 4xx (not 409): do NOT retry — fix the request.
```
## Pitfalls
- Using a server-generated key instead of a client-generated one — the client can't retry if the first response never arrived
- Setting a dedup window under 24 hours — not sufficient for mobile clients on spotty networks
- Scoping the key globally (not per-user) — one user can accidentally collide with another
- Not storing the full response body — on replay the server must return identical status + body, not regenerate
- Making `GET` idempotent with this mechanism — `GET` is already safe; only unsafe methods need it
## See Also
- [`../../agents/api-implementation-engineer.md`](../../agents/api-implementation-engineer.md) — HTTP semantics and unsafe-retry patterns
- [`../../agents/api-security-engineer.md`](../../agents/api-security-engineer.md) — resource-consumption limits (API4)
- [`../../CLAUDE.md`](../../CLAUDE.md) — house opinion: unsafe retries need an Idempotency-Key
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!