Skip to content
Back to skills

Getting Started Audit

ASecurity

Measure and shorten time-to-first-success — walk the getting-started path from a clean state, time it, rank friction points by where developers drop off, and make a fix-or-document call on each. Use whenever you need to know how good (or bad) onboarding really is.

  • 7 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 23, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 23, 2026

npx -y skills add mcorbett51090/RavenClaude --skill getting-started-audit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Getting Started Audit?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Getting Started Audit
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mcorbett51090-getting-started-audit/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mcorbett51090-getting-started-audit)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: getting-started-audit
description: "Measure and shorten time-to-first-success — walk the getting-started path from a clean state, time it, rank friction points by where developers drop off, and make a fix-or-document call on each. Use whenever you need to know how good (or bad) onboarding really is."
---

# Skill: Getting-started audit

Measure the one number that decides adoption — time-to-first-success — and find the
friction that's inflating it. Most developers decide in the first ten minutes.

## When to use

- You don't know how long it takes a new developer to get a real result.
- Sign-ups are healthy but activation (first app / retention) is weak.
- Before investing in reach — reach that lands a dev on a broken first-run is waste.

## Procedure

1. **Start from a genuinely clean state** — new account, no cached creds, no
   insider knowledge. Anything you "already know" is a friction point a real
   developer will hit.
2. **Time it to first success.** Record the wall-clock minutes from signup to the
   first real result (first successful call, first working app). That's TTFS.
3. **Log every friction point** — each place you paused, guessed, hit an error, or
   left the page. Note where in the funnel (signup → first call → first app) it
   sits, because friction earlier costs more.
4. **Rank by drop-off impact**, not by how annoying it felt to you. Friction at
   "signup → first call" loses more developers than friction deep in an advanced
   flow.
5. **Make a fix-or-document call per friction point** (tree 2 in
   [`../../knowledge/devrel-engagement-decision-trees.md`](../../knowledge/devrel-engagement-decision-trees.md)):
   product-pain → product-feedback ticket; sound-but-undiscoverable → content task.
6. **Capture it** in the
   [`getting-started-audit`](../../templates/getting-started-audit.md) template.

## Output

A measured TTFS, a ranked friction list, and a fix-or-document disposition per
item — the input to both the content plan and the product-feedback brief.

## Anti-patterns (the hook flags these)

- A getting-started doc with no explicit **first-success milestone**.
- "Improving onboarding" with no TTFS measurement to move.
- Papering over a product flaw with a longer tutorial instead of filing the bug.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…