Select the applicable sustainability-reporting framework(s) and scope the disclosure: determine which standards apply (CSRD/ESRS, ISSB IFRS S1/S2, GRI, SEC), run the right materiality test (double vs financial), fix the reporting boundary and governance, and crosswalk overlapping frameworks into one roadmap.
Scanned 9/23/2026
npx -y skills add mcorbett51090/RavenClaude --skill framework-selection-and-materiality --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Framework Selection And Materiality?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mcorbett51090-framework-selection-and-materiality)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: framework-selection-and-materiality
description: "Select the applicable sustainability-reporting framework(s) and scope the disclosure: determine which standards apply (CSRD/ESRS, ISSB IFRS S1/S2, GRI, SEC), run the right materiality test (double vs financial), fix the reporting boundary and governance, and crosswalk overlapping frameworks into one roadmap."
---
# Framework Selection & Materiality
## Determine applicability first
Which standards apply is driven by jurisdiction, listing, size, and counterparty demand — not preference. EU presence → CSRD/ESRS (double materiality, phased). US listing → the SEC climate rule (verify effective status). An ISSB-adopting jurisdiction → IFRS S1/S2. Voluntary/investor/procurement/insurer demand → GRI and/or ISSB to the audience. More than one usually applies.
## Run the correct materiality test
- **Double materiality (CSRD/ESRS):** assess BOTH impact materiality (effect on people/planet) and financial materiality (effect on the company). Material on either axis → disclose.
- **Financial materiality (ISSB IFRS S1/S2, SEC):** effects on enterprise value / the financial statements only.
- **Impact materiality (GRI):** significance of impacts on economy, environment, people.
A survey is one input, not a determination. Name the test, the governance that signed off, and the evidence per material topic.
## Fix the reporting boundary
Choose the consolidation approach (equity share / financial control / operational control) deliberately and once; define the value-chain scope; name and justify the deltas from the financial consolidation. Every downstream number inherits this boundary.
## Crosswalk, don't duplicate
When CSRD and ISSB (and GRI/SEC) all apply, map the overlapping data points once and disclose against each. Source each shared figure once — never run two parallel projects.
## Output
A framework-applicability determination, the materiality test with governance and per-topic evidence, the reporting boundary, the crosswalk, and a sequenced disclosure roadmap. Each material topic maps to its framework clause. Hand the inventory to `ghg-accounting-analyst` and the drafting/assurance to `disclosure-and-assurance-lead`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!