Skip to content
Back to skills

Design Hiring Loop

ASecurity

Design a structured hiring loop — rubric, consistent questions, evidence-based scoring, a debrief that surfaces dissent — over a vibe-based one. Reach for this before scheduling interviews.

  • 7 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 23, 2026
ai-agents

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 23, 2026

npx -y skills add mcorbett51090/RavenClaude --skill design-hiring-loop --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Design Hiring Loop?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Design Hiring Loop
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mcorbett51090-design-hiring-loop/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mcorbett51090-design-hiring-loop)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: design-hiring-loop
description: "Design a structured hiring loop — rubric, consistent questions, evidence-based scoring, a debrief that surfaces dissent — over a vibe-based one. Reach for this before scheduling interviews."
---

# Skill: Design a hiring loop

Unstructured "I just clicked with them" interviews predict little and amplify bias (§3 #6).

## Step 1 — Define the bar from the role
What must this person *do* in the first 6–12 months? Turn that into 3–5 competencies the loop will assess — not a wishlist.

## Step 2 — One competency per interview, with a rubric
Assign each interviewer a competency and a scored rubric (what a strong/mixed/weak answer looks like) so the bar is the same on Tuesday and Friday (§3 #6).

## Step 3 — Consistent, behavioral questions
Same core questions per competency across candidates; ask for past behavior with evidence, not hypotheticals-only.

## Step 4 — A debrief that surfaces dissent
Collect written evidence-based scores *before* the group talks; then surface disagreement rather than averaging it away — dissent is data (§3 #6).

## Step 5 — Bias + candidate-experience pass
Check the loop for bias amplifiers; respect the candidate's time. No protected-class or PII in scoring artifacts (§2).

## Output
A structured loop: competencies, per-interview rubric, question bank, and a debrief protocol — written scores collected before the group discusses. The growth-plan template ([`../../templates/growth-plan.md`](../../templates/growth-plan.md)) is the reference shape for level-mapped expectations the rubric assesses against.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…