Skip to content
Back to skills

Ads Quick

ASecurity

60-Second Ad Readiness Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-airustgotestingapiperformance

Works with

  • terminal
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Maxymize/maxym-ai-ads --skill ads-quick --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ads Quick?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ads Quick
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/maxymize-ads-quick/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/maxymize-ads-quick)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ads-quick
description: 60-Second Ad Readiness Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents
version: 1.0.0
author: maxym-ai-ads
tags: [ads, quick, snapshot, assessment, readiness]
trigger: /ads quick
output: Terminal output (no file saved)
---

# 60-Second Ad Readiness Snapshot

## Skill Purpose
Perform a rapid ad readiness assessment of a website or business without launching subagents. Fetches the homepage, evaluates value proposition strength, offer clarity, CTA quality, landing page readiness, and trust signal presence. Outputs a compact scorecard with a platform recommendation and estimated starting budget. The entire output must be under 40 lines.

## When to Use
- User wants a quick gut-check before investing in a full ad strategy
- User asks "should I run ads?" or "am I ready for ads?"
- User wants a fast assessment without waiting for the full 5-agent analysis
- User is exploring whether paid advertising makes sense for their business
- Triggered by `/ads quick <url>`

## When NOT to Use
- User wants a detailed, comprehensive strategy (use `/ads strategy` instead)
- User already has ad data to analyze (use `/ads audit` instead)
- User needs creative briefs (use `/ads creative` instead)
- No URL is provided (this skill requires a URL to fetch)

## How to Execute

### Step 1: Fetch and Analyze the Homepage

Use `WebFetch` to retrieve the homepage content. Extract these elements:

```
WebFetch(url) -> Analyze:
1. Headline / Hero Section — What is the main promise?
2. Value Proposition — Is it clear what they sell and why it matters?
3. CTA(s) — What action are they asking visitors to take?
4. Offer — Is there a specific offer (pricing, free trial, discount)?
5. Trust Signals — Reviews, testimonials, badges, client logos, certifications?
6. Visual Quality — Professional images, consistent branding, modern design?
7. Mobile Indicators — Responsive hints, fast-loading signals?
8. Contact Info — Phone, email, chat, address visible?
```

### Step 2: Score 5 Dimensions

Rate each dimension on a 0-20 scale:

**1. Value Proposition Strength (0-20)**
| Score | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| 17-20 | Crystal clear what they do, for whom, and why it's better. Unique mechanism stated. |
| 13-16 | Clear offering, target audience implied, some differentiation. |
| 9-12 | Generic value prop, could apply to many businesses. |
| 5-8 | Vague or buried value proposition. Requires effort to understand. |
| 0-4 | No clear value proposition. Visitor would not know what this business does. |

**2. Offer Clarity (0-20)**
| Score | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| 17-20 | Specific offer with pricing, clear next step, and urgency/scarcity element. |
| 13-16 | Offer is visible but lacks urgency or specific pricing. |
| 9-12 | Generic "contact us" or "learn more" without a defined offer. |
| 5-8 | No clear offer — visitor must dig to find what to do next. |
| 0-4 | No offer whatsoever. No pricing, no CTA, no next step. |

**3. CTA Quality (0-20)**
| Score | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| 17-20 | Strong, specific CTA above the fold. Action-oriented language. Multiple CTAs in logical places. |
| 13-16 | CTA exists above the fold but is generic ("Learn More", "Contact Us"). |
| 9-12 | CTA exists but is below the fold or hard to find. |
| 5-8 | Weak or confusing CTAs. Multiple competing actions with no hierarchy. |
| 0-4 | No CTA visible. No clear path for the visitor to take action. |

**4. Landing Page Readiness (0-20)**
| Score | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| 17-20 | Fast-loading, mobile-friendly, professional design, conversion-optimized layout. |
| 13-16 | Good design, loads reasonably, but not optimized for conversions. |
| 9-12 | Functional but dated design, some UX issues, average load time. |
| 5-8 | Slow, outdated, poor mobile experience, or cluttered layout. |
| 0-4 | Broken, extremely slow, or unprofessional. Would hurt ad performance. |

**5. Trust Signal Presence (0-20)**
| Score | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| 17-20 | Multiple trust signals: reviews with star ratings, testimonials with names/photos, client logos, certifications, media mentions. |
| 13-16 | Some trust signals present (reviews or testimonials, but not both). |
| 9-12 | Minimal trust signals — maybe a generic "trusted by" without specifics. |
| 5-8 | Almost no social proof. Only basic contact info as trust signal. |
| 0-4 | No trust signals. Anonymous website with no credibility markers. |

**Ad Readiness Score** = Sum of all 5 dimensions (0-100)

### Step 3: Determine Platform Recommendation

Based on the business type and readiness score, recommend the best starting platform:

| Business Type | Primary Platform | Why | Min Budget/Month |
|---------------|-----------------|-----|-----------------|
| Local Service | Google Ads (Search) | High-intent search traffic | $500-$1,500 |
| E-commerce | Meta (FB/IG) | Visual products, impulse purchases | $1,000-$3,000 |
| SaaS B2B | LinkedIn + Google | Professional targeting, search intent | $2,000-$5,000 |
| SaaS B2C | Meta + Google | Broad reach + search capture | $1,000-$3,000 |
| Restaurant | Meta (Local) | Visual food content, local targeting | $300-$800 |
| Course/Creator | YouTube + Meta | Video content, retargeting | $1,000-$2,500 |
| Agency/Consulting | LinkedIn + Google | B2B targeting, authority | $1,500-$4,000 |

**Secondary Platform Recommendation:**
After the primary platform is established (30-60 days), recommend a secondary platform:
| Primary | Secondary | Why Add It |
|---------|-----------|-----------|
| Google Search | Meta (retargeting) | Capture search visitors who did not convert |
| Meta | Google Search | Catch high-intent searchers your social ads prompted |
| LinkedIn | Google Search | Capture branded searches from LinkedIn awareness |
| YouTube | Meta | Retarget video viewers with direct response ads |

### Step 4: Estimate CPC and CPA Ranges

Provide realistic cost expectations based on industry and platform:

**CPC Ranges by Industry and Platform:**
| Industry | Google Search CPC | Meta CPC | LinkedIn CPC | TikTok CPC |
|----------|------------------|----------|-------------|-----------|
| Local Services | $3-$12 | $0.80-$2.50 | N/A | $0.50-$1.50 |
| E-commerce | $0.50-$3 | $0.40-$1.50 | N/A | $0.20-$0.80 |
| SaaS B2B | $3-$15 | $1.50-$4.00 | $4-$12 | N/A |
| SaaS B2C | $1-$5 | $0.50-$2.00 | N/A | $0.30-$1.00 |
| Education/Courses | $1-$6 | $0.60-$2.00 | $3-$8 | $0.25-$0.80 |
| Restaurant/Hospitality | $0.50-$3 | $0.30-$1.00 | N/A | $0.20-$0.60 |
| Agency/Consulting | $3-$10 | $1.00-$3.50 | $5-$12 | N/A |

**Expected CPA by Business Type:**
| Business Type | Low CPA | Avg CPA | High CPA | Notes |
|---------------|---------|---------|----------|-------|
| Local Service (lead) | $15 | $35 | $75 | Phone call or form submission |
| E-commerce (purchase) | $10 | $30 | $60 | Depends heavily on AOV |
| SaaS B2B (demo/trial) | $50 | $150 | $300 | Higher LTV justifies higher CPA |
| SaaS B2C (sign-up) | $5 | $25 | $60 | Free trial vs paid sign-up |
| Course (enrollment) | $20 | $60 | $120 | Webinar funnel reduces CPA |
| Restaurant (visit) | $3 | $10 | $25 | Tracked via offer redemption |

### Step 5: Competitive Quick Check

Before finalizing the snapshot, do one quick competitive signal check:

**WebSearch query:**
```
"[Industry]" "[City]" ads OR advertising OR sponsored
```

Note: Are competitors actively advertising? If yes, the market is validated but competitive. If no, there may be an opportunity or the market may not support paid ads.

### Step 6: Generate Readiness Verdict

| Score Range | Verdict | Recommendation |
|-------------|---------|---------------|
| 80-100 | Ready to Launch | Start ads immediately. Focus on testing and scaling. |
| 60-79 | Almost Ready | Fix 1-2 gaps first, then launch. Estimate 1-2 weeks of prep. |
| 40-59 | Needs Work | Significant improvements needed before ads will be effective. 2-4 weeks. |
| 20-39 | Not Ready | Major landing page and offer issues. Fix fundamentals first. 4-8 weeks. |
| 0-19 | Rebuild Required | Website/offer needs major overhaul before any ad spend. |

## Output Format

Output directly to terminal. Do NOT save a file. Keep output under 40 lines.

```
============================================
  AD READINESS SNAPSHOT: [Business Name]
  URL: [url]
============================================

  AD READINESS SCORE: [XX]/100 — [Verdict]

  SCORECARD:
  Value Proposition ... [XX]/20 [status word]
  Offer Clarity ....... [XX]/20 [status word]
  CTA Quality ......... [XX]/20 [status word]
  Landing Page ........ [XX]/20 [status word]
  Trust Signals ....... [XX]/20 [status word]

  TOP 3 STRENGTHS:
  1. [strength]
  2. [strength]
  3. [strength]

  TOP 3 GAPS TO FIX:
  1. [gap + specific fix]
  2. [gap + specific fix]
  3. [gap + specific fix]

  RECOMMENDED PLATFORM: [Platform]
  ESTIMATED STARTING BUDGET: $[X]-$[Y]/month
  EXPECTED CPC RANGE: $[X]-$[Y]

  NEXT STEP: [One specific action to take]
  Full strategy: /ads strategy [url]
============================================
```

## Important Rules
- This is a SPEED tool — complete the entire analysis in under 60 seconds
- Do NOT launch any subagents — this is a single-pass analysis
- Output must be under 40 lines — be concise
- Do NOT save a file — output to terminal only
- Always end with a recommendation to run `/ads strategy` for the full analysis
- If the homepage cannot be fetched, explain the issue and suggest the user provide a different URL
- Be honest about readiness — do not inflate scores to be encouraging
- Budget recommendations should be realistic monthly minimums, not aspirational
- Always consider the business type when recommending platforms
- One specific next step is more valuable than a list of generic advice

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.