Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Resolve Design Errors

ASecurity

Use when asked to run Design Error Detection (quick defect scan), find design errors in a Simulink model, perform root cause analysis on DED findings, fix division-by-zero, overflow, dead logic or out-of-bounds defects detected by SLDV, or diagnose why missing coverage cannot be achieved (dead logic blocking coverage objectives). Do NOT use for requirement verification, test generation, Inf/NaN detection, active logic analysis, or coverage measurement.

1,176 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 8/31/2026
ai-agentsgoapi

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 20 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 8/31/2026

$npx -y skills add matlab/simulink-agentic-toolkit --skill resolve-design-errors --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Resolve Design Errors?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Resolve Design Errors
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/matlab-resolve-design-errors/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/matlab-resolve-design-errors)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: resolve-design-errors
description: Use when asked to run Design Error Detection (quick defect scan), find design errors in a Simulink model, perform root cause analysis on DED findings, fix division-by-zero, overflow, dead logic or out-of-bounds defects detected by SLDV, or diagnose why missing coverage cannot be achieved (dead logic blocking coverage objectives). Do NOT use for requirement verification, test generation, Inf/NaN detection, active logic analysis, or coverage measurement.
license: https://www.mathworks.com/content/dam/mathworks/license/pmrl/license.md
metadata:
  author: MathWorks
  version: "1.3"
  toolbox_dependencies:
    - Simulink Design Verifier
    - Simulink Check
---

# Detecting Design Errors (SLDV DED + Root Cause Analysis)

## When to Use

- User asks to **check a Simulink model for design errors** (division-by-zero, overflow, dead logic, out-of-bounds)
- User asks to **find root causes** of DED findings
- User asks to **fix** or **understand** an analysis finding
- User asks **why there is missing coverage** due to dead logic (dead logic gates prevent coverage objectives from being satisfied)
- User has SLDV artifacts (`.mat` file) and wants analysis without re-running DED

## When NOT to Use

- **Requirement verification** — checking if a model satisfies a requirement
- **Test generation or test authoring** — creating test cases from requirements or for coverage
- **Comprehensive verification** — this skill is a quick defect scan, not an exhaustive proof; a clean result does not guarantee the model is free of all errors
- **Coverage measurement** — this skill does not measure or report model coverage; use Simulink Coverage tools

## Safety Rules

1. **Never patch the original model directly.** Always clone first before applying any fix.
2. **NEVER apply fixes without explicit user approval.** After root cause analysis, present findings and *suggest* a fix strategy — then STOP and wait for the user to say "yes, apply it" or "go ahead." Even if the user's prompt says "suggest a fix" or "fix it," you must present the plan first and wait for confirmation. Do NOT create clone models, set parameters, or run verification until the user explicitly approves.
3. **SLDV results are always sound.** Never assume SLDV returns false positives. If SLDV reports a defect, it is a real defect — treat every finding as a true positive and investigate accordingly.

**Requires:** MATLAB R2023b+, Simulink Design Verifier, Simulink Check / Model Slicer.

## Prerequisites

All script functions live in the skill's `scripts/` directory. Use `evaluate_matlab_code` with `project_path` set to that folder so MATLAB can find them.

---

## Workflow

This skill provides two functions that automate SLDV-driven analysis the agent otherwise gets
wrong when hand-rolling it, then hands you the facts to classify and fix findings. The workflow
is four steps:

```
1. Detect errors      → sldv_run_defect_checker   (use the function; don't hand-roll DED)
2. Root cause errors  → sldv_find_de_root_cause    (use the function; don't hand-roll slicing)
3. Classify errors    → agent step (dead logic: intentional vs. design_error)
4. Fix errors         → agent step (propose, get approval, clone-fix-verify)
```

Steps 1–2 are the two functions. Steps 3–4 are agent judgment based on their output. Full API
detail (return fields, options, caching, sub-functions) is in **`references/api-reference.md`** —
load it when you need exact fields or options.

### Step 1 — Detect errors

Call `sldv_run_defect_checker(model)` instead of writing your own SLDV DED invocation or
parsing objectives by hand — it configures the analysis, runs DED, and auto-loads cached
`*_sldvdata.mat` results when available.

```matlab
result = sldv_run_defect_checker("my_model", OutputDir="artifacts/ded")
```

**If `result.Status == "pass"`: STOP.** Report "No design errors of the checked types were
detected" and end the workflow. Do NOT call `sldv_find_de_root_cause` or investigate further.
DED is a quick scan, not an exhaustive proof — tell the user no defects of the checked types
were found, not that the model is error-free.

Proceed to Step 2 only when `result.Status == "fail"`.

### Step 2 — Root cause errors

Call `sldv_find_de_root_cause(model, DedResult=result.DedResult)` instead of hand-building
slices — it returns backward slices, counterexamples, locality (blast-radius) measures, and
shared-root cascade annotations for every finding.

```matlab
rca = sldv_find_de_root_cause("my_model", DedResult=result.DedResult, OutputDir="artifacts/ded")
```

Then trace each finding to its root cause:
1. Follow the counterexample through `rca.SliceBlocks` to find which block produces the
   defect-triggering value
2. Use `model_overview` / `model_read` to understand each block's role
3. Prefer high-`Locality` blocks (narrow blast radius, safer) and high-`FindingCount` blocks
   (fix resolves more defects); check `rca.Cascades` — a shared-root fix resolves multiple
   findings at once

**When the slice is shallow (< 3 blocks) or stops at a Stateflow / MATLAB Function block:**
the Model Slicer cannot trace through those constructs. Do NOT stop and report only what the
tool returned — fall back to `model_read` / `model_overview` to interpret the finding: read
the defect block and its upstream connections, read the Stateflow chart or MATLAB Function
logic the slice stopped at, and cross-reference counterexample values to see which branch is
active.

---

## Step 3 — Classify errors (dead logic)

Classification happens **after** root cause analysis — you need to see the root cause (which
block, what value) before deciding whether dead logic is intentional.

**Findings arrive pre-enriched.** For every dead logic finding, `sldv_find_de_root_cause`
attaches on the finding struct:

- `finding.ModelContext` — a `model_read` dump of the block's surrounding scope. You do **not**
  need to call `model_read` again for this. (If empty — model_read was unavailable — fall back
  to `model_overview` / `model_read` yourself for that block.)
- `finding.PatternCatalog` — the entire dead-logic pattern library (catalog index + every
  pattern), concatenated. You do **not** need to open the YAML files yourself.
- `finding.Classification` — `"pending"`, awaiting your decision.

**How to classify.** For each dead logic finding, using `ModelContext` and `PatternCatalog`:
1. Look at the root cause block — what value does it produce that makes the branch dead?
2. Compare the model context against the patterns in `PatternCatalog`.
3. Decide: is the block INTENTIONALLY producing this value (safety guard, disabled feature,
   complementary Stateflow guards) or is it a BUG (wrong parameter, cascading error)?

Set the classification:
- `"intentional"` — defensive logic, enable-as-input, negation guard pairs → no fix needed;
  report to the user as expected behavior
- `"design_error"` — wrong parameter, cascading dead logic, short-circuit → fix the root cause
- `"unclassified"` — unclear → ask the user

Only apply fixes for `"design_error"` findings.

---

## Step 4 — Fix errors

The functions provide facts; you identify root causes and decide fixes — there is no hardcoded
defect-to-fix mapping.

When you are ready to propose or apply a fix, **load and follow `references/fix-strategy.md`**.
It covers root-cause identification, the clone-fix-verify procedure, fix principles, and the
blast-radius discussion required for every proposal.

Two rules that always apply (see Safety Rules): present findings and wait for explicit approval
before applying anything, and propose a fix for **every** `design_error` finding — 2–3 ranked
options each when possible — rather than stopping after only some.

---

## Common Mistakes

| Mistake | Fix |
|---------|-----|
| Continuing after `Status == "pass"` | **STOP.** Zero falsified objectives = no defects. Do not call `sldv_find_de_root_cause` or investigate further. Report "no defects found" and end. |
| Calling `sldv_find_de_root_cause` without DedResult or DataFile | Pass one of the two — check `result.DedResult` from the checker |
| Running on an unsaved model | Save first; DED needs a file on disk |
| Applying fixes without presenting findings to user | Always show root cause analysis results first, get approval before fixing |
| Stopping at a shallow slice | Fall back to `model_read` / `model_overview` (Step 2) |
| Running on large models without `OutputDir` | Set `OutputDir` to avoid temp-dir clutter |

----

Copyright 2026 The MathWorks, Inc.

----

Attribution

matlabmatlab
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from matlab →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →