Skip to content
Back to skills

Pre Landing Review

ASecurity

Gate-oriented safety audit for code changes before landing, using a checklist with two-pass severity triage. Triggers on: "is this safe to land", "pre-landing review", "safety check before merge", "gate check", "/pre-landing-review". NOT for diff review, use pr-review.

  • 318 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-airustgoshellsqlexpresscode-reviewgitapidatabasesecurity

Works with

  • claude code
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Mathews-Tom/armory --skill pre-landing-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pre Landing Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pre Landing Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mathews-tom-pre-landing-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mathews-tom-pre-landing-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pre-landing-review
description: 'Gate-oriented safety audit for code changes before landing, using a checklist with two-pass severity triage. Triggers on: "is this safe to land", "pre-landing review", "safety check before merge", "gate check", "/pre-landing-review". NOT for diff review, use pr-review.'
metadata:
  version: 1.0.1
  category: review
  tags: [pre-merge, safety-gate, code-review, checklist]
  difficulty: intermediate
  phase: review
---

# Pre-Landing Review

Gate-oriented safety audit for code changes before landing. Uses a structured checklist with two-pass severity triage and blocking/non-blocking classification.

**Distinct from `pr-review`**: pr-review is a multi-dimension code quality review. This skill is a **gate-oriented safety audit** — it uses an external checklist with two-pass severity triage and a blocking/non-blocking classification.

> **Native alternative:** Claude Code's `/ultrareview` runs a dedicated native review session optimized for bug-finding (Anthropic ships three free per month on Pro/Max plans at Opus 4.7's launch). Use this skill for checklist-driven, gate-oriented blocking classification with a documented triage protocol; use `/ultrareview` for lightweight bug-hunting on a single change.

## Workflow

### 1. Determine Diff

Identify the changes to review:

- If on a feature branch: diff against the default branch (`git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD`)
- If given a PR number: fetch that PR's diff
- If given specific files: review those files

### 2. Load Checklist

Read `references/checklist.md`. This is mandatory — if the checklist is unreadable, STOP and report the error.

### 3. Pass 1 — CRITICAL (blocking)

Review the diff against critical safety categories. These are potential ship-blockers.

#### SQL & Data Safety

- Raw SQL without parameterization
- Schema changes without migration safety (lock timeout, reversibility)
- Bulk updates/deletes without WHERE clause verification
- Direct column updates bypassing model validations/callbacks

#### Race Conditions & Concurrency

- Read-then-write without locking
- Unique constraint reliance without database-level enforcement
- Shared mutable state without synchronization
- Queue/background job idempotency

#### Trust Boundaries

- LLM/AI output used in SQL, shell commands, or rendered HTML without sanitization
- User input reaching privileged operations without validation
- External API responses used without schema validation
- Deserialization of untrusted data

For each CRITICAL finding:

1. Cite exact file and line
2. Explain the specific risk
3. Use `AskUserQuestion` with exactly three options: **Fix now** / **Acknowledge risk** / **False positive**
4. If "Fix now": make the fix, then re-check
5. If "Acknowledge": record acknowledgment, continue
6. If "False positive": record, continue

### 4. Pass 2 — INFORMATIONAL (non-blocking)

Review against remaining categories:

**Conditional Side Effects** — side effects hidden in conditional branches, callbacks triggered by state changes, error handlers silently swallowing failures.

**Magic Numbers** — unexplained numeric literals, hardcoded thresholds without constants, timeout values without rationale.

**Dead Code** — unreachable branches, unused imports, commented-out code without explanation.

**Test Gaps** — new code paths without test coverage, modified behavior without updated tests, missing edge case and error path tests.

**Crypto & Entropy** — weak random sources for security contexts, hardcoded secrets, missing TLS/encryption for sensitive data in transit.

**Time Window Safety** — timezone-naive comparisons, daylight saving edge cases, cron expressions not accounting for clock skew.

**Type Coercion** — implicit type conversions that could lose data, numeric precision loss across boundaries, implicit string encoding at I/O boundaries.

Present all informational findings in a single summary table (file, line, category, description).

### 5. Gate Classification

- All Pass 1 issues resolved (fixed or acknowledged) → **CLEAR TO LAND**
- Any unresolved Pass 1 issue → **BLOCKED**
- Pass 2 issues are advisory — they don't block landing

### 6. Suppressions

Do NOT flag:

- Test files using test fixtures/factories
- Migration files following framework conventions
- Comments explaining why a pattern is intentional
- Configuration files with documented values
- Type stubs or interface definitions

## Output

Gate verdict (CLEAR TO LAND / BLOCKED), critical issues summary with resolution status, informational findings table.

**This skill is read-only by default** — only modifies code when user explicitly chooses "Fix now" on a critical issue.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • evals/cases.yaml1.9 KB
  • references/checklist.md2.9 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.