Pg Founder Qualities
ASecurityPaul Graham's model of what makes a good startup founder. Use this whenever the user asks what investors or YC look for in founders, how to evaluate a potential cofounder or themselves as a founder, what determination, resourcefulness, persistence, earnestness or "founder mode" mean, whether being nice or tough matters, how to tell stubborn from persistent, or how to run a company as it scales without becoming a manager. Also use it when the user is writing a YC application, preparing for a f...
- 2 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 2 views
- Added October 15, 2026
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add masthedude/pg-founder-skills --skill pg-founder-qualities --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Pg Founder Qualities?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/masthedude-pg-founder-qualities)---
name: pg-founder-qualities
description: Paul Graham's model of what makes a good startup founder. Use this whenever the user asks what investors or YC look for in founders, how to evaluate a potential cofounder or themselves as a founder, what determination, resourcefulness, persistence, earnestness or "founder mode" mean, whether being nice or tough matters, how to tell stubborn from persistent, or how to run a company as it scales without becoming a manager. Also use it when the user is writing a YC application, preparing for a founder interview, or asking why certain founders succeeded. Use it even when the user frames it as a hiring or character question rather than a startup question.
---
# PG Founder Qualities
> **Essay text is not bundled.** Paul Graham's essays are copyrighted, so this repo ships only links. Run `scripts/fetch_essays.py` once to download them into `references/essays/` for local use. The script sits two folders above this skill (`../../scripts/`) in both the repo and a plugin install, and needs no arguments from there. If a file there is missing, read the essay from its URL in `references/essays.md` instead.
PG's single most repeated finding: the founders matter more than the idea. "Good people can fix bad ideas, but good ideas can't save bad people." This skill collects what "good" means in his vocabulary.
Read `references/essays/` for exact passages, especially `founders.txt`, `relres.txt`, `determination.txt`, `persistence.txt`, `earnest.txt`, `foundermode.txt`.
## The five things YC looks for (What We Look for in Founders, 2010)
1. **Determination.** The most important quality, more than intelligence, once over a threshold. Bill Clerico of WePay: "when Bill Clerico starts calling you, you may as well do what he asks, because he is not going away."
2. **Flexibility.** Not "don't give up on your dreams." Modify your dreams on the fly. The running back: determined to get downfield, willing to go sideways or backwards. Daniel Gross went through three ideas before Greplin.
3. **Imagination.** The kind of intelligence that produces surprising new ideas with "just the right level of craziness." Airbnb was on the right side of crazy.
4. **Naughtiness.** A piratical gleam. They delight in breaking rules, but not rules that matter. YC's application question: tell us about a time you hacked something to your advantage.
5. **Friendship.** Two or three founders who genuinely like each other. "Startups do to the relationship between the founders what a dog does to a sock: if it can be pulled apart, it will be."
## The vocabulary
**Relentlessly resourceful.** The two-word definition of a good founder; the opposite of hapless (battered by circumstances). Not merely relentless, because the obstacles are novel; you don't know if you're pushing through foam or granite, so you keep trying new things. Partly teachable, especially to young people who've always been under authority. "Make something people want" is the destination; "be relentlessly resourceful" is how you get there.
**Conversational resourcefulness.** The least successful founders are hard to talk to: everything you say goes through an internal process that munges it to fit a decision already made. Good founders chase down every implication of what they're told, even the inconvenient ones. "A word to the wise is sufficient." Fire-and-forget founders: give them a lead and they'll close it.
**Formidable.** "Seems like they'll get what they want, regardless of whatever obstacles are in the way." Roughly, justifiably confident. Most future successes aren't good at seeming formidable at first because school and jobs train cooperation. Don't imitate swagger; you'll depart from sincere and never arrive at convincing. The way to seem formidable is to be telling the truth about something you've actually evaluated.
**Earnest.** The highest compliment PG and Jessica pay. Doing it for the right reasons (interest in the problem for its own sake) and trying as hard as you can. Formidable plus earnest is "as close to unstoppable as you get." The earnest seem naive, can't do sophisticated banter, and are doomed to be the straight man. Heuristic for choosing fields: how much does earnestness matter there? Infer from how many nerds are at the top.
**Determination's anatomy.** Willfulness balanced by discipline, aimed by ambition. The melon seed: squeezed by two fingers, it flies far if the pressure is equal, sideways if not. Willfulness is mostly inborn; discipline can be cultivated; ambition is the most malleable and "almost everyone is practically malnourished" in it. Determination erodes itself as success brings temptation. Too much discipline is possible: the young succeed by not knowing how incompetent they are.
**Persistent vs obstinate.** The persistent are attached to the goal; the obstinate to their ideas about how to reach it. "Boats whose engines can't be throttled back" vs "boats whose rudders can't be turned." The Collisons listen to pointed-out problems "with an almost predatory intensity." Five components of persistence: energy, imagination, resilience (setbacks can't change your morale, not that they can't change your mind), good judgement about expected value, and a goal that's neither too specific nor too general. The optimal amount of obstinacy is not zero.
**Nice, not mean.** Remarkably few successful founders are mean. Meanness makes you stupid (fights aren't general enough to yield big ideas), repels the best people, and conflicts with the benevolence that keeps founders going past the first acquisition offer. "Startups don't win by attacking. They win by transcending." It's safe to be nice because making great things compounds and rapacity doesn't: extracting half as much money leaves you a mere 15 weeks behind at 5% weekly growth. Ron Conway became powerful by being good; in a transparent, unpredictable world you can't seem good without being good.
**Bad people make bad founders.** They exploit cofounders first, then users (early adopters are the hardest to fool). The most they achieve is tricking an acquirer, and those acquisitions are never big.
**Genuine interest beats money.** The founders who end up richest aren't driven by money, or they'd have taken one of the acquisition offers every fast-growing startup gets. "The company is their project." Money-motivated founders sell early; cool-seeking founders find easier ways to seem cool.
**Founder mode.** As companies scale, founders are told to switch to manager mode: hire good people and give them room. In practice that often means "hire professional fakers and let them drive the company into the ground." There are things founders can do that managers can't; skip-level meetings will become normal; Jobs's retreat was the 100 most important people, not the 100 highest on the org chart. Delegation still exists but the borders vary and must be earned.
## Signals PG uses in practice
- Projects built and finished, not grades or credentials.
- How intently they take notes and act on advice (the Airbnbs implemented every suggestion plus two more by the next meeting).
- The Obama/McCain cereal story: evidence of resourcefulness, determination, and working together under stress. "The single most important factor" in funding Airbnb.
- Whether they can answer any question about their users.
- Whether they listen to disagreement with engagement or glaze over.
- Admitting ignorance: genuinely smart people can say "I don't know" and "maybe you're right."
- Cofounder character and commitment over ability. "Don't pick cofounders who will flake." Trust your gut about people; misgivings you suppress now blow up later.
## How to run a session
For self-assessment or cofounder evaluation: walk the five qualities and the vocabulary, asking for concrete evidence from the person's history (what they built, what they finished, how they responded to a specific setback, a time they hacked something). Weight determination and the cofounder relationship highest, raw intelligence lowest above threshold. For YC applications and interviews, point to Billionaires Build: teach the partners about your users, answer candidly, go into gruesome detail about what could go wrong, name competitors. For scaling questions, point to Founder Mode and warn that it will be misused as an excuse not to delegate.
## Source essays in `references/essays/`
- `founders.txt` What We Look for in Founders (Oct 2010).
- `relres.txt` Relentlessly Resourceful (Mar 2009).
- `word.txt` A Word to the Resourceful (Jan 2012).
- `determination.txt` The Anatomy of Determination (Sep 2009).
- `persistence.txt` The Right Kind of Stubborn (Jul 2024).
- `earnest.txt` Earnestness (Dec 2020).
- `mean.txt` Mean People Fail (Nov 2014).
- `safe.txt` Why It's Safe for Founders to Be Nice (Aug 2015).
- `5founders.txt` Five Founders (Apr 2009). Jobs, TJ Rodgers, Larry and Sergey, Buchheit, Altman.
- `foundermode.txt` Founder Mode (Sep 2024).
Files in this skill
- SKILL.md
- agents/openai.yaml
- references/essays.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.