Skip to content
Back to skills

Anticipatory Selling

ASecurity

Auto-generate 5 sales support materials for pipeline Steps 5-7 — competitive comparison table, 3-year TCO analysis, internal proposal template, objection rebuttals, phased implementation timeline. Core principle is arming the buyer to sell internally. Use when deals reach Step 5+ or when win rates at Steps 5-7 are low.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
businessrustgosecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add masterleopold/anty-framework --skill anticipatory-selling --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Anticipatory Selling?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Anticipatory Selling
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/masterleopold-anticipatory-selling/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/masterleopold-anticipatory-selling)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: anticipatory-selling
description: Auto-generate 5 sales support materials for pipeline Steps 5-7 — competitive comparison table, 3-year TCO analysis, internal proposal template, objection rebuttals, phased implementation timeline. Core principle is arming the buyer to sell internally. Use when deals reach Step 5+ or when win rates at Steps 5-7 are low.
type: skill
---

# Anticipatory Selling

## When to Apply
- Deal reaches pipeline Step 5 (Overview Presented)
- Win rates at Steps 5-7 are declining
- Buyer needs internal approval or committee sign-off
- When the founder asks "how do I close this deal?"
- Proactively when pipeline has deals approaching Step 5

## Core Principle

**"You're not selling to the buyer — you're arming them to sell internally."**

By the time a deal reaches Step 5, the buyer is often convinced. The real challenge is helping them convince their boss, CFO, procurement team, or board. Anticipatory selling provides pre-built ammunition for that internal sale.

## Core Framework

### 5 Materials Package (Auto-Generated)

**1. Competitive Comparison Table**

Structure:
```
| Capability      | Us         | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|-----------------|------------|-------------|-------------|
| [Core feature]  | [strength] | [strength]  | [weakness]  |
| [Pricing model] | [detail]   | [detail]    | [detail]    |
| [Support]       | [detail]   | [detail]    | [detail]    |
| Best for        | [use case] | [use case]  | [use case]  |
```

Rules:
- Honest, not adversarial — acknowledge competitor strengths
- Use cases where each excels
- Price comparison using public data only
- "Best for" framing rather than "better than"

**2. 3-Year TCO Analysis**

Include ALL costs, not just license price:
- Software license/subscription (3-year total)
- Implementation and setup costs
- Training and onboarding time (monetized)
- Ongoing maintenance and administration
- Integration costs with existing stack
- Opportunity cost of alternatives (including "do nothing")

Format: side-by-side comparison with status quo and 1-2 alternatives.

**3. Internal Proposal Template**

Pre-written template the buyer can adapt and send to their decision-maker:
- Executive summary (2-3 sentences)
- Problem statement (grounded in buyer's specific pain)
- Proposed solution (mapped to their needs from Step 3-4)
- Expected ROI with conservative estimates
- Implementation timeline (phased, low-risk)
- Risk mitigation plan
- Next steps and decision timeline

**4. Objection Rebuttals**

Top 5-7 objections with evidence-based responses:

| Objection | Rebuttal Strategy | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "Too expensive" | Value Stick reframe: WTP vs price perception | TCO comparison, ROI projection |
| "We can build it ourselves" | Build vs buy TCO + opportunity cost | Engineering hours x rate + maintenance |
| "Not the right time" | Cost of delay calculation | Monthly cost of not solving the problem |
| "Need to see more references" | Case studies + direct intro offers | Similar company results |
| "Security/compliance concerns" | Proactive compliance documentation | Certifications, audit reports |
| "Switching costs too high" | Phased migration plan | Step-by-step with rollback at each phase |
| "Need committee approval" | Internal proposal template (material #3) | Pre-built approval package |

**5. Phased Implementation Timeline**

```
Phase 1 (Days 1-30): Quick Wins
  - [Specific deliverable with measurable outcome]
  - Success criteria: [metric]
  - Rollback plan: [specific reversal step]

Phase 2 (Days 31-60): Core Implementation
  - [Specific deliverable]
  - Success criteria: [metric]
  - Checkpoint: continue/adjust decision

Phase 3 (Days 61-90): Full Deployment
  - [Specific deliverable]
  - Success criteria: [metric]
  - Transition to ongoing operation
```

Each phase: quick wins first, clear success criteria, explicit rollback plan (reduces risk perception).

## Decision Rules

1. **Generate proactively at Step 5** — don't wait for the buyer to ask
2. **Customize to buyer's stated needs** — use data from Steps 3-4
3. **Conservative ROI estimates** — credibility over optimism
4. **Honest comparisons** — adversarial comparison tables backfire
5. **Phased = low risk** — always include rollback at each phase
6. **Internal champion enablement** — materials should work WITHOUT the seller present

## Anti-Patterns to Detect

| Anti-Pattern | Signal | Response |
|---|---|---|
| No sales support materials | Deals stalling at Steps 5-7 | "Generate anticipatory selling package. The buyer needs ammunition." |
| Adversarial comparison | "Competitor X is terrible" | "Honest comparison builds trust. Acknowledge competitor strengths." |
| Optimistic ROI | "10x return guaranteed" | "Conservative estimates are more credible. Use realistic projections." |
| Missing TCO | Only comparing license price | "Include implementation, training, maintenance, and opportunity costs." |
| No rollback plan | Big-bang implementation proposed | "Phased approach with rollback reduces perceived risk." |
| Seller-dependent materials | Materials only work in a meeting | "The buyer's boss won't be in your meeting. Materials must stand alone." |

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.