Run risky or multi-file agent work as a reviewable proposal before mutating the target workspace. Use when a task should produce retained output, inspectable diffs, and an explicit select/apply/discard decision instead of direct edits.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills --skill reversible-agent-task --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Reversible Agent Task?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/markoblogo-reversible-agent-task)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: reversible-agent-task
description: Run risky or multi-file agent work as a reviewable proposal before mutating the target workspace. Use when a task should produce retained output, inspectable diffs, and an explicit select/apply/discard decision instead of direct edits.
license: MIT
metadata:
abvx_status: experimental
abvx_origin: adapted
abvx_eval_tier: fixture_checked
---
# Reversible Agent Task
Use a proposal-first workflow when direct mutation would make review, rollback, or comparison harder.
## Use When
- an agent runner, SET bundle, or planning doc mentions retained output, proposal lifecycle, settlement, or reversible traces;
- the task can be attempted in a worktree, draft branch, sandbox, retained-output folder, or external runner proposal;
- multiple possible implementations should be compared before one is applied;
- the target repo should remain unchanged until a human or supervisor reviews the output.
## Lifecycle
1. `run`: execute the task in a proposal context, such as a worktree, draft branch, sandbox, or retained-output directory.
2. `retained_output`: keep generated files, diffs, logs, and proof artifacts separate from the target workspace.
3. `inspect`: review diff scope, verification evidence, assumptions, and expected artifacts.
4. `select`: mark one retained output as the candidate result.
5. `apply`: merge or copy the selected proposal into the target workspace only after gates pass.
6. `discard`: reject the proposal and leave the target workspace unchanged.
## Procedure
1. Define the target workspace and the proposal workspace.
2. State the mutation rule: no direct writes to the target workspace until `apply`.
3. Capture expected artifacts, verification commands, and retained-output path before the run.
4. Run the agent or implementation loop in the proposal context.
5. Inspect the retained output:
- changed files;
- generated artifacts;
- tests or checks run;
- unresolved assumptions;
- scope drift.
6. Choose exactly one settlement action: `select`, `apply`, or `discard`.
## Output Shape
Include:
- target workspace;
- proposal workspace or retained-output location;
- lifecycle state reached;
- artifacts produced;
- verification evidence;
- settlement action: `select`, `apply`, or `discard`;
- blockers or assumptions.
## Guardrails
- Do not present retained output as applied work.
- Do not hide failed proposals; summarize why they were discarded.
- Do not mutate the target workspace during `run` or `inspect`.
- Do not use this skill for trivial one-file edits where normal git diff review is enough.
- Keep the proposal mechanism host-agnostic: worktree, branch, sandbox, retained directory, or external runner are all acceptable.
## Pair With
- `pipeline-readiness-gate` for pre/post/ship gate selection.
- `assumption-excavation` before running high-ambiguity proposals.
- `confidence-fragility-review` before applying a proposal with public or release claims.
- `delivery-baseline-audit` before calling applied work complete.
- `filesystem-context-discipline` when retained outputs, scratchpads, or handoffs need durable file structure.
## Provenance
Adapted from proposal lifecycle patterns in reversible agent runtimes such as `shepherd-agents/shepherd`, narrowed into a host-agnostic ABVX review discipline. This skill does not require Shepherd.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!