Skip to content
Back to skills

Quick Screen Scorecard

ASecurity

Score any acquisition opportunity across nine weighted criteria the moment a teaser or CIM lands, and get a pursue / hold / pass verdict out of 18. Use to triage deals fast, when asked to 'screen this deal', 'is this worth my time', 'score this opportunity', or to pass bad deals in minutes instead of weeks.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 2, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 2, 2026

npx -y skills add MariusGithub13/open-deal-kit --skill quick-screen-scorecard --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Quick Screen Scorecard?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Quick Screen Scorecard
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mariusgithub13-quick-screen-scorecard/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mariusgithub13-quick-screen-scorecard)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: quick-screen-scorecard
description: Score any acquisition opportunity across nine weighted criteria the moment a teaser or CIM lands, and get a pursue / hold / pass verdict out of 18. Use to triage deals fast, when asked to 'screen this deal', 'is this worth my time', 'score this opportunity', or to pass bad deals in minutes instead of weeks.
---

# The Quick-Screen Scorecard

*System 2 of 4 · PASS BAD DEALS FAST · [The Deal Kit](../../README.md)*

Most deals should be a pass. The skill is passing them in minutes, not weeks. Score any opportunity across nine criteria the moment a teaser or CIM lands, and let the total tell you whether it's worth your time.

---

## The system

Paste below into Claude with the teaser or CIM.

Score this deal using the Quick-Screen Scorecard. Rate each criterion 0-2 (0 = poor / concerning, 1 = acceptable, 2 = strong), with one line of evidence each:
- Thesis fit
- Size fit
- Revenue quality
- Margin & cash health
- Customer diversification
- Owner independence
- Growth durability
- Price sanity
- Red-flag load (2 = few/none)

Mark any criterion you can't assess as "unknown" and don't guess. Total the score out of 18, then give a verdict using these bands: 13+ pursue, 8-12 hold and dig, under 8 pass, and name the single fact that would most change the result.

---

> The bands are a starting point. Tune the thresholds to your own buy-box over time.

> *Analytical tool, not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always check against the source documents.*

> See a full cited deal read: https://os.devaland.com/sample-brief

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.