Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Verification Gauntlet

ASecurity

Surround agent work with hard, signal-gated verification probes and anti-greenwash rules. Use before done claims, after implementations, or when tests look too easy; not for pure explanation.

3 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
ai-agentsgobashapisecurity

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add marcmarti9/agentit --skill verification-gauntlet --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Verification Gauntlet?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Verification Gauntlet
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/marcmarti9-verification-gauntlet/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/marcmarti9-verification-gauntlet)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: verification-gauntlet
description: Surround agent work with hard, signal-gated verification probes and anti-greenwash rules. Use before done claims, after implementations, or when tests look too easy; not for pure explanation.
---

# Verification Gauntlet

Inspired by craft practice (hard constraints over line-by-line code reading): agents write code **and** tests, but green self-tests alone are not proof. Agentit adds an external gauntlet.

## When to Use

- Before any done / fixed / shipping claim on non-trivial work
- After implementing behavior, auth, DB, API, or UI changes
- When the agent reports “N tests passed” but confidence is low
- RISK_2+ implementation, or whenever `verification-before-completion` applies

**Not for:** pure explanation with no working-tree claim.

## Layers

| Layer | What |
|-------|------|
| L0 | Project native suite (`pytest`, `flutter test`, `npm test`, …) |
| L1 | Change contract: acceptance criteria + red→green for behavior |
| L2 | Stack probes from `probes/catalog.yaml` (only if signals match) |
| L3 | Anti-greenwash rules (cannot skip to look good) |
| L4 | Human gate RISK_3/4 (existing router policy) |

## Process

### 1. Plan the gauntlet

```bash
agentit verify "short task description" --project .
# or JSON:
agentit verify "…" --project . --format json
```

Read: `signals`, blocking probes, runnable commands, checklists, `anti_greenwash`.

### 2. Apply runnable probes

```bash
agentit verify "…" --project . --apply
```

- Scripts and detectible project commands run automatically.
- Checklist probes stay `pending_agent_evidence` until you fill evidence in the close-out.
- Receipt: `.agentit/verify/<timestamp>-receipt.json`

### 3. Satisfy checklists with evidence

For each pending checklist (examples):

- **change-contract-red-green** — show red command then green command (or explicit pure-refactor waiver)
- **acceptance-criteria** — 3–7 task-specific checks, each pass/fail + proof
- **postgres-rls-discipline** — only if postgres/supabase signals
- **auth-boundary** — only if auth signals

Do **not** mark pass without a command, path, or observed behavior.

### 4. Anti-greenwash (non-negotiable)

- Do not delete, skip, or weaken probes to claim green
- Do not treat agent-authored unit tests as the whole gauntlet when other probes apply
- Do not accept subagent “success” as a receipt for RISK_2+; re-run blocking probes
- “200 tests passed” without receipt path / probe statuses is not completion
- If the working tree changed after tests, re-run verification on the **final** tree
- Router field `verification.claims_without_evidence: forbidden` applies to all done/fixed/passing claims
- Programmatic gate (optional): `router.verify.evaluate_done_claims(claims, receipt=…)`

### 5. Close-out shape

```
VERIFY:
- receipt: .agentit/verify/…
- blocking probes: pass/fail list
- checklists: evidence summary
- residual risk: …
```

Only then may you claim done (`verification-before-completion` still requires fresh command evidence for each claim).

## CLI reference

| Command | Effect |
|---------|--------|
| `agentit verify "task"` | Plan only (default) |
| `agentit verify "task" --apply` | Run runnable probes + write receipt |
| `agentit verify "task" --format json` | Machine-readable plan/receipt |

## Relation to other skills

- **`verification-before-completion`** — iron law of evidence; this skill defines *which* external gates exist
- **`test-driven-development`** — produces red→green for behavior; gauntlet checks you actually observed it
- **`security-and-hardening`** — deeper auth/secrets work; probes are minimum smoke
- **`using-agentit`** — session close-out should include verify receipt when this skill applied

## Red flags

- Skipping `agentit verify` on an implementation task
- Checklist marked pass with no evidence line
- Disabling RLS / auth to green tests
- Only running the happy-path tests the agent just invented
- Claiming browser polish with no build/serve/browser note

## Verification of this skill

- [ ] `agentit verify` plan run for the task
- [ ] `--apply` run when runnable probes exist
- [ ] Receipt path cited
- [ ] Every blocking checklist has evidence or an explicit residual gap
- [ ] No done claim while blocking probes failed

Attribution

marcmarti9marcmarti9
View sourceMore from marcmarti9 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

1023331 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3331 votes

catchup

Recovers prior coding-agent session context by running `catchup <agent> --since-compact`, which extracts a clean summary of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, OpenCode, or Pi Agent session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", or asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

611 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →