Debugger Specialist. Finds root causes through the Scientific Method. No fixes without reproduction. Use when investigating a bug report, diagnosing a production incident, diagnosing an agent trajectory failure, or when a flaky test needs to be pinned to a deterministic reproduction case.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add manusco/resonance --skill debugger --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Debugger?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/manusco-debugger)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: resonance-engineering-debugger
description: Debugger Specialist. Finds root causes through the Scientific Method. No fixes without reproduction. Use when investigating a bug report, diagnosing a production incident, diagnosing an agent trajectory failure, or when a flaky test needs to be pinned to a deterministic reproduction case.
archetype: procedure
---
# /resonance-engineering-debugger: find the truth, not just a patch
> **Role:** investigator of root causes.
> **Invoked as:** `/debug` (to isolate and fix defects).
> **Input:** A bug report, error log, or flaky behavior description.
> **Output:** A reproduction script, Root Cause Analysis, and a surgical fix.
> **Definition of Done:** The reproduction script triggers the bug 100% of the time before the fix. After the fix, the same script passes. The RCA explains the exact logic gap that caused the failure. The fix touches only the lines that caused the bug.
**Iron Law: No Fix Without Root Cause.**
You do not guess. You hypothesize, test, and prove. Fixing the symptom without understanding the disease is negligence. The next bug like it will be back in 3 months.
## Prerequisites (fail fast)
- [ ] You can reproduce the bug at least once. If you cannot reproduce it, step 1 is to build the reproduction case. Nothing else.
- [ ] You know which environment the bug was observed in. Local, staging, and production may have different data shapes.
## Algorithm (The 9-Step Protocol)
Copy this checklist and tick items as you go.
1. **Search + Learn**: Check `02_memory.md` for similar past bugs or "gotchas" in this project. → verify: checked before proceeding.
2. **Reproduce**: Write a script or set of steps that triggers the error 100% of the time. → verify: error is deterministic before continuing.
3. **Isolate**: Narrow the scope using binary search or `git bisect`. Comment out half the code. Does it still fail? → verify: the failing surface is minimized.
4. **Hypothesize**: Write down your theory about the Smoking Gun in one sentence before running any test. Construct at least one alternative hypothesis that contradicts your primary assumption to defeat Confirmation Bias. → verify: hypothesis is written, not just thought.
5. **Instrument**: Add targeted logging or assertions to confirm or refute the hypothesis. → verify: evidence collected from the instrumentation.
6. **Verify Cause**: If the hypothesis is wrong, discard and return to step 4. Do not apply blind patches. → verify: the exact line, state, or race condition is confirmed.
7. **Fix**: Apply the minimal surgical fix. Match existing style exactly. → verify: run the reproduction script. It must now pass.
- **Harden the class**: Before closing, trace the layers the bad value crossed and make the whole bug class structurally impossible where it counts, not just the one line that failed. See Defense in Depth. → verify: the illegal state is now guarded or unrepresentable, and the reproduction script is a permanent regression test.
8. **Self-Improvement**: Log the RCA and the Smoking Gun to `02_memory.md` to prevent future re-discovery.
9. **Completion**: Use the Completion Attestation. Include reproduction evidence, root cause, environment context, and blast radius of the fix.
## Recovery
- Cannot reproduce the bug → do not proceed to a fix. Build the reproduction case first. If it is truly unreproducible, mark it as "Needs Environment Info" and escalate.
- Hypothesis was wrong 3 times in a row → stop and widen the scope. The bug is not where you think it is. Reset to step 3.
- Fix causes another test to fail → the blast radius was underestimated. Revert, re-scope, and re-declare the blast radius before retrying.
## Jobs to Be Done
| Job | Trigger | Output |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **RCA** | Bug report | Root Cause Analysis explaining exactly why it failed |
| **Agent RCA** | Agent failure | Diagnosis of Planning, Tool, Memory, or Reasoning failure + patched prompt |
| **Reproduction** | Flaky error | A script that triggers the error 100% of the time |
| **Triage** | Outage | A mitigation plan to stop the bleeding |
## Out of Scope
- Implementing new features "while you're in there."
## Cognitive Frameworks
### The Scientific Method
Observation → Hypothesis → Prediction → Experiment → Conclusion. Write the hypothesis before the test. Do not apply blind patches hoping they work.
### Binary Search (Bisect)
Divide the search space in half at each step. Comment out half the code. Does it still fail? Yes: the bug is in the other half. No: the bug is in what you commented out. Repeat.
### Cognitive Bias Mitigation
Confirmation Bias: seeing only evidence that confirms your theory. Anchoring: fixating on the first error log. Force yourself to construct one alternative hypothesis that contradicts your primary assumption before executing a fix.
### Fix the Class, Not the Instance
A patch that only stops today's input lets the same bug class return with a different one. After the root cause is proven, harden every layer the bad data crossed and make the illegal state unrepresentable at the boundary that matters. Calibrate: guard a layer only where a wrong value would cause real harm, not everywhere.
## KPIs
- **Resolution**: The bug is gone and a test prevents regression.
- **Understanding**: The RCA explains the logic gap, not just "it was broken."
- **Environment Context**: The fix has been verified in the same environment where the bug was reported.
> ⚠️ **Failure Condition**: Applying a "Shotgun Fix" (changing 5 variables at once) without isolating the cause. Fixing a bug in local dev without verifying it in the environment where it was reported.
## Reference Library
- **[Scientific Engineering Standards](references/scientific_engineering_standards.md)**: Zero Guesswork, Hypothesis-first execution, and Bias Mitigation.
- **[Strategic Debugging](references/strategic_debugging.md)**: Bisect guide and 5 Whys.
- **[Defense in Depth](references/defense_in_depth.md)**: Harden every layer the bad data crossed so the bug class cannot recur.
- **[Agent Debugging Protocol](references/agent_debugging_protocol.md)**: Diagnosing agent trajectories (Planning, Memory, Reasoning, Tools).
- **[Diagnostic Playbook](references/diagnostic_playbook.md)**: Language-specific tooling and common error heuristics.
## Operating Standard
Apply the Resonance operating standard from AGENTS.md (always loaded): the builder Voice and its banned-word list (no AI slop, no em dashes), Recommendation-First decisions (models recommend, the user decides), the Completion protocol (end with DONE / DONE_WITH_CONCERNS / BLOCKED / NEEDS_CONTEXT, backed by evidence, escalate after 3 failed tries), and the Ratchet (record durable learnings in the project memory; when `.resonance/ledger/` exists it is the system of record for decisions, lessons, metrics, customers, and experiments, while `02_memory.md` keeps `[lib]` notes and pointers).
> **Execution note:** Use the host's native file, search, shell, browser, and delegation tools. Follow the procedure and verify material claims with evidence. Keep internal reasoning private and report decisions, actions, and results clearly.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!