Use when security patterns for autonomous trading agents with wallet or transaction authority. Covers prompt injection, spend limits, pre-send simulation, circuit breakers, MEV protection, and key handling. Triggers on \"llm-trading-agent-security\", \"llm trading agent security\", \"security\".
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majinmagros/magros.ai-skills --skill llm-trading-agent-security --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Llm Trading Agent Security?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majinmagros-llm-trading-agent-security)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: llm-trading-agent-security
description: "Use when security patterns for autonomous trading agents with wallet or transaction authority. Covers prompt injection, spend limits, pre-send simulation, circuit breakers, MEV protection, and key handling. Triggers on \"llm-trading-agent-security\", \"llm trading agent security\", \"security\"."
metadata:
origin: ECC direct-port adaptation
version: "1.0.0"
---
# LLM Trading Agent Security
Autonomous trading agents have a harsher threat model than normal LLM apps: an injection or bad tool path can turn directly into asset loss.
## When to Use
- Building an AI agent that signs and sends transactions
- Auditing a trading bot or on-chain execution assistant
- Designing wallet key management for an agent
- Giving an LLM access to order placement, swaps, or treasury operations
## When NOT to Use
- General LLM agent hardening without transaction authority (use `agent-guardrails`)
- Smart-contract code itself, not the agent (use `defi-amm-security`)
- General application security review (use `security-review`)
## How It Works
Layer the defenses. No single check is enough. Treat prompt hygiene, spend policy, simulation, execution limits, and wallet isolation as independent controls.
## Examples
### Treat prompt injection as a financial attack
```python
import re
INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
r'ignore (previous|all) instructions',
r'new (task|directive|instruction)',
r'system prompt',
r'send .{0,50} to 0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}',
r'transfer .{0,50} to',
r'approve .{0,50} for',
]
def sanitize_onchain_data(text: str) -> str:
for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE):
raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection: {text[:100]}")
return text
```
Do not blindly inject token names, pair labels, webhooks, or social feeds into an execution-capable prompt.
### Hard spend limits
```python
from decimal import Decimal
MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD = Decimal("500")
MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD = Decimal("2000")
class SpendLimitError(Exception):
pass
class SpendLimitGuard:
def check_and_record(self, usd_amount: Decimal) -> None:
if usd_amount > MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Single tx ${usd_amount} exceeds max ${MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD}")
daily = self._get_24h_spend()Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!