Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Closed Loop Verifier Pattern

ASecurity

Use when implementing closed-loop agent verification — deployed app behaving is the ONLY signal that closes the loop; runtime verifiers drive live app; mocks prove nothing. Triggers on "closed loop verifier", "deployed app verification", "runtime verification", "not mocks", "screenshot driven testing".

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
ai-agentsbashrailstestingdebugginggitperformance

Works with

claude codecli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add majinmagros/magros.ai-skills --skill closed-loop-verifier-pattern --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Closed Loop Verifier Pattern?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Closed Loop Verifier Pattern
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majinmagros-closed-loop-verifier-pattern/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majinmagros-closed-loop-verifier-pattern)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: closed-loop-verifier-pattern
description: Use when implementing closed-loop agent verification — deployed app behaving is the ONLY signal that closes the loop; runtime verifiers drive live app; mocks prove nothing. Triggers on "closed loop verifier", "deployed app verification", "runtime verification", "not mocks", "screenshot driven testing".
metadata:
  origin: ECC
  source_docs:
    - https://github.com/testsprite/testsprite-cli
    - https://playwright.dev
    - https://pptr.dev
  video_source: "EIiXhCaZ4rw - I Mathematically CALCULATED the worth of Codex & Claude Code PLANS (AI Code King)"
  related_skills:
    - testsprite-cli-integration
    - loop-design-check
    - verification-loop
    - gan-style-harness
    - agent-guardrails
    - outcome-rubric-verification
---

# Skill: closed-loop-verifier-pattern — O Único Sinal que Fecha o Loop

> **"A green run on the agent's own machine proves nothing. The one signal that actually closes the loop: the deployed thing behaving for a real user."** — AI Code King

Runtime verifiers (TestSprite, Playwright, Puppeteer) drive o **app deployed como usuário real**, capturam screenshot de falha, permitem patch + rerun. Implementação em `references/implementation.md`.

## Quando usar

- Você tem **agent loops** que precisam de verificação real (não mocks)
- Quer provar que **checkout flow, forms, navigation, auth** funcionam de verdade
- Precisa de **screenshot-driven debugging**: ver exatamente o que usuário vê
- Quer **auto-patch + rerun** quando verifier detecta falha
- Está construindo **gan-harness** com verificação de runtime
- Precisa eliminar "green on mocks, broken in prod"

## Quando NÃO usar

- Testes unitários/integração tradicionais → use pytest/Jest/Vitest
- Visual regression only → use Playwright/Percy/Chromatic
- Load/performance testing → use k6/Locust
- Mock-based testing é suficiente → use testing library padrão
- Verificação design-time → use `verification-loop`, `loop-design-check`

---

## Conceito Central

```
TRADICIONAL (quebrado):  Generate → Test (mocks) → Pass (green) → Deploy 💥
CLOSED-LOOP (correto):   Generate → Deploy (real) → Verify (real) → PASS (real)
                                                          ↓ FAIL
                                              screenshot + patch → rerun
```

`ClosedLoopAgent.run()`: generate (informado por falhas anteriores) → deploy real → verifier drive o app → PASS? ship : captura falha para a próxima iteração. Ver `references/implementation.md` (`RuntimeVerifier` ABC, `ClosedLoopAgent`, `TestSpriteVerifier`, `PlaywrightVerifier`, specs prontas de checkout/auth/form, config GAN).

```bash
# Como eval-mode no gan-harness:
/gan-build "build checkout flow" --eval-mode testsprite \
  --eval-config testsprite.config.json --max-iterations 5 --pass-threshold 1.0
```

---

## Anti-Patterns

Attribution

majinmagrosmajinmagros
View sourceMore from majinmagros →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

1023331 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3331 votes

catchup

Recovers prior coding-agent session context by running `catchup <agent> --since-compact`, which extracts a clean summary of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, OpenCode, or Pi Agent session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", or asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

611 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →