Skip to content
Back to skills

Wow Executing Checker Workflow

ASecurity

Step-by-step validation workflow for checker agents - initialize report, discover content, validate progressively, finalize with summary. Use when implementing or updating checker agents.

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added June 10, 2026
ai-agentspythonrustgobashdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 10, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill wow-executing-checker-workflow --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Wow Executing Checker Workflow?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Wow Executing Checker Workflow
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-wow-executing-checker-workflow/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-wow-executing-checker-workflow)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: wow-executing-checker-workflow
description: Step-by-step validation workflow for checker agents - initialize report, discover content, validate progressively, finalize with summary. Use when implementing or updating checker agents.
created: 2026-01-05
updated: 2026-01-05
---

# Executing Checker Workflow

Common workflow pattern for all checker agents in the maker-checker-fixer three-stage quality pipeline.

## When This Skill Loads

This Skill auto-loads for checker agents that need standardized workflow for validating content and generating audit reports.

## Core Checker Workflow

Checker agents follow a consistent 5-step workflow:

```
Step 0: Initialize Report
    ↓
Step 1-N: Validate Content (domain-specific)
    ↓
Final Step: Finalize Report
```

### Step 0: Initialize Report File

**CRITICAL FIRST STEP - Execute before any validation begins:**

See `wow-generating-validation-reports` Skill for complete UUID chain generation and report initialization.

**Quick Implementation**:

```bash
# 1. Generate 6-char UUID
MY_UUID=$(uuidgen | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | head -c 6)

# 2. Determine UUID chain (scope-based)
SCOPE="${EXECUTION_SCOPE:-agent-family}"
CHAIN_FILE="generated-reports/.execution-chain-${SCOPE}"

if [ -f "$CHAIN_FILE" ]; then
  read PARENT_TIME PARENT_CHAIN < "$CHAIN_FILE"
  CURRENT_TIME=$(date +%s)
  TIME_DIFF=$((CURRENT_TIME - PARENT_TIME))

  if [ $TIME_DIFF -lt 300 ]; then
    UUID_CHAIN="${PARENT_CHAIN}_${MY_UUID}"
  else
    UUID_CHAIN="$MY_UUID"
  fi
else
  UUID_CHAIN="$MY_UUID"
fi

echo "$(date +%s) $UUID_CHAIN" > "$CHAIN_FILE"

# 3. Generate UTC+7 timestamp
TIMESTAMP=$(TZ='Asia/Jakarta' date +"%Y-%m-%d--%H-%M")

# 4. Create report filename
REPORT_FILE="generated-reports/${AGENT_FAMILY}__${UUID_CHAIN}__${TIMESTAMP}__audit.md"

# 5. Initialize report with header
cat > "$REPORT_FILE" << 'HEADER'
# Validation Report: {Agent Name}

**Status**: In Progress
**Agent**: {agent-name}
**Scope**: {scope-description}
**Timestamp**: {YYYY-MM-DD--HH-MM UTC+7}
**UUID Chain**: {uuid-chain}

---

## Findings

[Findings will be written progressively during validation]
HEADER
```

**Why Initialize Early?**

- Creates file before validation begins (survives context compaction)
- Enables progressive writing (append findings as discovered)
- Provides audit trail even if validation interrupted
- File is readable throughout execution

### Steps 1-N: Validate Content (Domain-Specific)

**Pattern**: Each checker has domain-specific validation steps, but all follow progressive writing.

**Common Validation Step Structure**:

```markdown
### Step {N}: {Validation Type}

**Objective**: {What this step validates}

**Process**:

1. {Discovery action - e.g., "Find all markdown files"}
2. {Extraction action - e.g., "Extract code blocks"}
3. {Validation action - e.g., "Verify against standards"}
4. **Write findings immediately** (progressive writing)

**Success Criteria**: {How to know step completed}

**On Failure**: {Error handling}
```

**Progressive Writing Requirements**:

- Write each finding to report file immediately after discovery
- Don't buffer findings in memory
- Use append mode for file writes
- Include all finding details (file, line, criticality, issue, recommendation)

**Finding Format**:

```markdown
### Finding {N}: {Title}

**File**: path/to/file.md
**Line**: {line-number} (if applicable)
**Criticality**: {CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW}
**Category**: {category-name}

**Issue**: {Description of what's wrong}

**Recommendation**: {How to fix it}

---
```

### Common Validation Steps by Checker Type

**Content Quality Checkers** (docs, readme, tutorial):

1. Step 1: Discovery - Find files to validate
2. Step 2: Structure - Check heading hierarchy, frontmatter
3. Step 3: Content Quality - Verify active voice, accessibility, formatting
4. Step 4: Standards Compliance - Check against conventions
5. Step 5: Cross-References - Validate internal links

**Factual Accuracy Checkers** (docs, facts):

1. Step 1: Discovery - Find files with verifiable claims
2. Step 2: Extraction - Extract commands, versions, code examples
3. Step 3: Verification - Check claims against authoritative sources (WebSearch/WebFetch)
4. Step 4: Classification - Mark as [Verified]/[Error]/[Outdated]/[Unverified]
5. Step 5: Confidence Assessment - Assign confidence levels

**Link Checkers** (link-general, link-specific):

1. Step 1: Discovery - Find all markdown files
2. Step 2: Extraction - Extract internal and external links
3. Step 3: Internal Validation - Check internal references exist
4. Step 4: External Validation - Check external URLs accessible
5. Step 5: Cache Management - Update link cache

**Structure Checkers** (structure, navigation):

1. Step 1: Discovery - Find folder structure
2. Step 2: Organization - Validate folder patterns
3. Step 3: Weights - Check weight ordering system
4. Step 4: Navigation - Verify prev/next links
5. Step 5: Completeness - Check for missing files

### Final Step: Finalize Report

**Final update to existing report file:**

```bash
# Update report status
cat >> "$REPORT_FILE" << 'SUMMARY'

## Summary

**Total Findings**: {N}

**By Criticality**:
- CRITICAL: {count}
- HIGH: {count}
- MEDIUM: {count}
- LOW: {count}

**Status**: Complete
**Completed**: {YYYY-MM-DD--HH-MM UTC+7}
SUMMARY
```

**Finalization Checklist**:

1. Update status: "In Progress" → "Complete"
2. Count findings by criticality level
3. Add completion timestamp
4. Ensure all findings written to file (progressive writing)
5. Report file path to user

## Tool Requirements

Checkers typically need:

- **Read**: Read files to validate
- **Glob**: Find files by pattern
- **Grep**: Extract content patterns (code blocks, commands, etc.)
- **Write**: Initialize and update report file
- **Bash**: Generate UUID, timestamp, file operations
- **WebFetch**: (Optional) Access official documentation
- **WebSearch**: (Optional) Find authoritative sources

**Bash Tool Critical**: Required for UUID generation and report initialization.

## Integration with Other Skills

**Required Skills** (should be in checker's `skills:` frontmatter):

- `wow-generating-validation-reports` - UUID chain, report format, progressive writing
- `wow-assessing-criticality-confidence` - Criticality level assessment
- Domain-specific Skills (e.g., `docs-validating-factual-accuracy`, `docs-validating-links`)

**Related Documentation**:

- [Temporary Files Convention](../../../docs/explanation/rules/development/infra/ex-ru-de-in__temporary-files.md)
- [Maker-Checker-Fixer Pattern](../../../docs/explanation/rules/development/pattern/ex-ru-de-pa__maker-checker-fixer.md)
- [Criticality Levels Convention](../../../docs/explanation/rules/development/quality/ex-ru-de-qu__criticality-levels.md)

## Progressive Writing Methodology

**CRITICAL REQUIREMENT**: All checkers MUST write findings progressively.

**Why Progressive Writing?**

- Context compaction during long validation runs can lose buffered findings
- Progressive writing ensures audit history survives
- File is readable during execution (monitoring)
- Findings preserved even if validation interrupted

**Implementation Pattern**:

```markdown
Step 0: Initialize Report File
→ Create file immediately with header

Steps 1-N: Validate Content
→ For each validation check: 1. Perform validation 2. Immediately append finding to report file 3. Continue to next check
→ DO NOT buffer findings in memory

Final Step: Finalize Report
→ Update status and add summary
→ File already contains all findings
```

**Anti-Pattern (Don't Do This)**:

```python
# ❌ BAD: Buffering findings in memory
findings = []
for file in files:
    issue = validate(file)
    findings.append(issue)  # Buffered in memory!

# Write all at end (lost if context compacts)
write_report(findings)
```

**Correct Pattern**:

```python
# ✅ GOOD: Progressive writing
initialize_report()
for file in files:
    issue = validate(file)
    append_to_report(issue)  # Written immediately!

finalize_report()
```

## Common Validation Patterns

### Pattern 1: File-Based Validation

```markdown
Step 1: Discover files using Glob
Step 2: For each file:

- Read content
- Check against standards
- Write findings immediately
  Step 3: Finalize with summary
```

### Pattern 2: Content Extraction and Verification

```markdown
Step 1: Discover files
Step 2: Extract verifiable claims using Grep
Step 3: For each claim:

- Verify against source (WebFetch/WebSearch)
- Assess correctness
- Write finding immediately
  Step 4: Finalize with summary
```

### Pattern 3: Cross-Reference Validation

```markdown
Step 1: Build index of all valid targets
Step 2: Discover files with references
Step 3: For each reference:

- Check against index
- Verify target exists
- Write finding if broken
  Step 4: Finalize with summary
```

## Criticality Assessment

See `wow-assessing-criticality-confidence` Skill for complete guidance.

**Quick Guidelines**:

- **CRITICAL**: Breaks functionality, renders content unusable
- **HIGH**: Significant impact, misleads users, violates core standards
- **MEDIUM**: Quality issues, minor violations, subjective improvements
- **LOW**: Cosmetic issues, suggestions, optional improvements

**Domain-Specific Examples** (add to checker agent, not this Skill):

Each checker should include domain-specific criticality examples relevant to its validation scope.

## Best Practices

1. **Initialize Early**: Create report file before any validation
2. **Write Progressively**: Append findings immediately, don't buffer
3. **Use Bash Tools**: Required for UUID and timestamp generation
4. **Follow Naming**: Use 4-part pattern with UUID chain
5. **Update Status**: "In Progress" during validation, "Complete" when done
6. **Count Findings**: Provide summary by criticality level
7. **Be Specific**: Include file paths, line numbers, clear recommendations
8. **Assess Criticality**: Use consistent criteria across checkers

## Example Workflow Execution

```markdown
Step 0: Initialize Report
→ UUID: a1b2c3
→ Timestamp: 2025-12-14--20-45
→ File: docs**a1b2c3**2025-12-14--20-45\_\_audit.md
→ Status: In Progress

Step 1: Discover Files
→ Found 15 markdown files in docs/

Step 2: Validate Structure
→ File 1: Check heading hierarchy → MEDIUM finding → Write immediately
→ File 2: Check frontmatter → HIGH finding → Write immediately
→ ...continue for all files

Step 3: Validate Content
→ File 1: Check active voice → LOW finding → Write immediately
→ ...continue validation

Step 4: Validate Links
→ Extract 50 links
→ Validate each → 3 CRITICAL findings → Write immediately

Final Step: Finalize Report
→ Update status: Complete
→ Add summary: 1 CRITICAL, 2 HIGH, 4 MEDIUM, 3 LOW
→ Total: 10 findings
```

## Key Takeaways

- **Initialize first**: Create report before validation begins
- **Write progressively**: Append findings immediately during validation
- **Use consistent format**: Follow 4-part naming with UUID chains
- **Be domain-specific**: Customize Steps 1-N for validation type
- **Finalize completely**: Update status and add summary statistics
- **Require Bash**: Essential for UUID and timestamp generation
- **Trust the pattern**: All checkers follow this workflow structure

This workflow ensures consistent, auditable, and resilient validation across all checker agents.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.