Deep web research for VCO: multi-hop search+browse+extract with an auditable action trace and a structured report (WebThinker-style).
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill webthinker-deep-research --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Webthinker Deep Research?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-webthinker-deep-research)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: webthinker-deep-research
description: "Deep web research for VCO: multi-hop search+browse+extract with an auditable action trace and a structured report (WebThinker-style)."
---
# WebThinker Deep Research (VCO)
## When to use
Use this skill when the task requires **deep web research** (not just one-shot search), for example:
- Multi-hop questions (“find → open → follow links → verify”)
- “Deep research report” / “调研报告” / “竞品调研” / “技术调研”
- Need an **auditable trace** of web actions and sources
- Need to merge findings into a structured deliverable (report / brief / spec)
## Non-goals (avoid redundancy)
- For **quick citations** or “give me 3 sources”, prefer `research-lookup`.
- For **interactive UI flows** (login / forms / downloads), prefer `playwright` or `turix-cua` overlays.
- For **codebase structure / call chains**, prefer GitNexus overlays (not web research).
## Output contract (must)
Produce a folder with:
- `report.md` — structured report (problem → findings → implications → next steps)
- `sources.json` — all sources (URL/title/access time/snippet)
- `trace.jsonl` — append-only action trace (search/open/extract/decision)
- `notes.md` — working notes with per-source anchors
Use `scripts/init_webthinker_run.py` to scaffold the folder.
## Runtime (Upstream vendoring)
This VCO skill supports a **stable Lite mode** by default, and keeps the upstream WebThinker repo **vendored** for optional advanced use.
- Vendored upstream paths:
- `C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\_external\ruc-nlpir\WebThinker\`
- Runtime config (no secrets stored):
- `C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\skills\vibe\config\ruc-nlpir-runtime.json`
- Preflight / install (no secrets echoed):
- `pwsh C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\skills\vibe\scripts\ruc-nlpir\preflight.ps1`
- Manually create an isolated venv for the vendored runtime and install only the minimal packages you need. The old `install-upstreams.ps1` auto-install path has been removed on purpose.
LLM endpoint conventions (recommended):
- Base URL: `OPENAI_BASE_URL` (or runtime default)
- API key: `OPENAI_API_KEY` (**env var only; never write into files or CLI args**)
## Modes
### Mode A (Recommended): Lite — tool-orchestrated deep research
Use existing tools (no heavy model hosting):
1. Scaffold outputs:
- `python C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\skills\webthinker-deep-research\scripts\init_webthinker_run.py --topic "…" --out outputs/webthinker`
2. Search (broad → narrow):
- Use `web.run` search queries or `mcp__tavily__tavily_search` if available.
3. Browse/extract:
- Use `web.run open/click/find` for structured pages
- Use `playwright` when pages require dynamic rendering / interactions
4. Draft + iterate:
- Update `notes.md` and `sources.json` continuously
- Write `report.md` as you go (think-search-and-draft), not only at the end
5. Verification:
- Triangulate key claims across ≥2 sources when possible
- Flag uncertainties explicitly
### Mode B (Optional): Full WebThinker stack
Only choose this if you want to run the upstream system end-to-end and you have the environment:
- Requires heavy deps (`torch`, `transformers`, `vllm`) + a served reasoning model
- Requires a search API (Serper recommended by upstream)
- Optional: Crawl4AI parser client for JS-heavy pages
This mode is for **high-throughput** deep research runs; for most VCO tasks, Lite mode is enough and cheaper.
## Action trace format (trace.jsonl)
Each line is one JSON object, e.g.:
- `{"ts":"…","type":"search","query":"…","provider":"web.run"}`
- `{"ts":"…","type":"open","url":"…"}`
- `{"ts":"…","type":"extract","url":"…","highlights":["…","…"]}`
- `{"ts":"…","type":"decision","reason":"why this source matters","next":"…"}`
## Quality gates
- Every major claim in `report.md` links back to at least one entry in `sources.json`.
- `sources.json` contains the exact URLs you used (no “I saw somewhere…”).
- Keep the report actionable: add “Next steps” with concrete verification tasks.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!