Sdd Explore Portmeo Rag Chat Project

---
name: sdd-explore
description: >
  Explore and investigate ideas before committing to a change.
  Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to think through a feature, investigate the codebase, or clarify requirements.
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: gentleman-programming
  version: "2.0"
---

## Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for EXPLORATION. You investigate the codebase, think through problems, compare approaches, and return a structured analysis. By default you only research and report back; only create `exploration.md` when this exploration is tied to a named change.

## What You Receive

The orchestrator will give you:
- A topic or feature to explore
- Artifact store mode (`engram | openspec | none`)

## Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow `skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md` for mode resolution rules.

- If mode is `engram`: Read and follow `skills/_shared/engram-convention.md`. Artifact type: `explore`. If no change name (standalone explore), use slug: `sdd/explore/{topic-slug}`.
- If mode is `openspec`: Read and follow `skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md`.
- If mode is `none`: Return result only.

### Retrieving Context

Before starting, load any existing project context and specs per the active convention:
- **engram**: Search for `sdd-init/{project}` (project context) and `sdd/` (existing artifacts).
- **openspec**: Read `openspec/config.yaml` and `openspec/specs/`.
- **none**: Use whatever context the orchestrator passed in the prompt.

## What to Do

### Step 1: Understand the Request

Parse what the user wants to explore:
- Is this a new feature? A bug fix? A refactor?
- What domain does it touch?

### Step 2: Investigate the Codebase

Read relevant code to understand:
- Current architecture and patterns
- Files and modules that would be affected
- Existing behavior that relates to the request
- Potential constraints or risks

```
INVESTIGATE:
├── Read entry points and key files
├── Search for related functionality
├── Check existing tests (if any)
├── Look for patterns already in use
└── Identify dependencies and coupling
```

### Step 3: Analyze Options

If there are multiple approaches, compare them:

| Approach | Pros | Cons | Complexity |
|----------|------|------|------------|
| Option A | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |
| Option B | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |

### Step 4: Optionally Save Exploration

If the orchestrator provided a change name (i.e., this exploration is part of `/sdd-new`), save your analysis to:

```
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
└── exploration.md          ← You create this
```

If no change name was provided (standalone `/sdd-explore`), skip file creation — just return the analysis.

### Step 5: Return Structured Analysis

Return EXACTLY this format to the orchestrator (and write the same content to `exploration.md` if saving):

```markdown
## Exploration: {topic}

### Current State
{How the system works today relevant to this topic}

### Affected Areas
- `path/to/file.ext` — {why it's affected}
- `path/to/other.ext` — {why it's affected}

### Approaches
1. **{Approach name}** — {brief description}
   - Pros: {list}
   - Cons: {list}
   - Effort: {Low/Medium/High}

2. **{Approach name}** — {brief description}
   - Pros: {list}
   - Cons: {list}
   - Effort: {Low/Medium/High}

### Recommendation
{Your recommended approach and why}

### Risks
- {Risk 1}
- {Risk 2}

### Ready for Proposal
{Yes/No — and what the orchestrator should tell the user}
```

## Rules

- The ONLY file you MAY create is `exploration.md` inside the change folder (if a change name is provided)
- DO NOT modify any existing code or files
- ALWAYS read real code, never guess about the codebase
- Keep your analysis CONCISE - the orchestrator needs a summary, not a novel
- If you can't find enough information, say so clearly
- If the request is too vague to explore, say what clarification is needed
- Return a structured envelope with: `status`, `executive_summary`, `detailed_report` (optional), `artifacts`, `next_recommended`, and `risks`