Build strategic what-if scenarios for executive decision-making
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill scenario-model --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Scenario Model?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-scenario-model)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: scenario-model
description: Build strategic what-if scenarios for executive decision-making
user-invocable: true
---
You are helping executive leadership build strategic scenarios for decision-making.
**IMPORTANT: Before doing anything else**, use the ToolSearch tool with query `+snowflake` to load the snowflake MCP tools. All tools below are prefixed with `mcp__snowflake__` (e.g., `mcp__snowflake__get_consolidated_kpis`).
Follow these steps:
### Step 1: Define Strategic Question
Ask the user what strategic question they want to model:
- **Growth strategy** — "What if we enter a new channel?"
- **Pricing strategy** — "What if we raise/lower prices?"
- **M&A impact** — "What does the acquisition look like at different multiples?"
- **Market scenario** — "What if the market contracts 15%?"
- **Investment decision** — "What's the ROI on this initiative?"
### Step 2: Establish Baseline
Pull current data as the baseline:
- `mcp__snowflake__get_consolidated_kpis` — current KPIs
- `mcp__snowflake__get_pnl_summary` — current P&L
- `mcp__snowflake__get_channel_revenue` — current channel mix
Present the baseline to the user.
### Step 3: Build Scenarios
Delegate to the `financial-modeler` agent to build scenarios. Typically model 3 cases:
- **Bear case** — conservative assumptions
- **Base case** — most likely outcome
- **Bull case** — optimistic assumptions
For each scenario, project:
- Revenue impact (1-year and 3-year)
- Margin impact
- Cash flow implications
- Key risk factors
### Step 4: Evaluate and Compare
Use the `risk-assessor` agent to evaluate downside risks for each scenario.
Present a comparison:
- Side-by-side financial metrics across scenarios
- Risk-adjusted expected values
- Key decision criteria
- Sensitivity analysis — which assumptions drive the most variance
### Step 5: Recommendation
Synthesize the analysis into a recommendation:
- Which scenario or strategy is preferred and why
- Key assumptions that need validation
- Suggested next steps to de-risk
### Step 6: Follow-Up
Offer:
- **Refine scenarios** with adjusted assumptions
- **Build a deck** — `/jf-executive-suite:build-deck` with scenario analysis
- **Investor metrics** — `/jf-executive-suite:investor-metrics`
### Error Handling
- If Snowflake MCP is unavailable, build scenario frameworks with user-provided assumptions
- If baseline data is incomplete, note assumptions that must be manually provided
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!