Use when the user asks to research, investigate, compare approaches, or explore a topic in depth. Supports configurable depth and multi-source synthesis.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill research-cmtkdot-arc --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Cmtkdot Arc?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-research-cmtkdot-arc-claude-skill-registry)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research
description: Use when the user asks to research, investigate, compare approaches, or explore a topic in depth. Supports configurable depth and multi-source synthesis.
invocation: agent
---
# Research
Deep research with multi-source synthesis. Uses `multi-ai` skill for provider routing when available.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Determine Depth
Use AskUserQuestion if depth is not specified:
- **Quick**: Fast overview of key concepts (2-3 sources)
- **Standard**: Comprehensive analysis with examples (5-8 sources)
- **Deep**: Thorough research with citations and evidence (10+ sources)
If the user provides `--depth`, skip the question.
### Step 2: Provider Routing
- If `ARC_MULTI_AI=true` and providers are available, use multi-provider research via `multi-ai` skill.
- Otherwise run Claude-only research with the same structure.
### Step 3: Multi-Source Synthesis
Launch the `persona-research-synthesizer` agent with gathered context:
```
subagent_type: "arc:persona-research-synthesizer"
run_in_background: true
prompt: "Research topic: <topic>\nDepth: <depth>\nProviders: <available providers>"
```
Output a status message and end your turn. The system wakes you when the agent finishes.
### Step 4: Report Results
```
## Research Complete
**Topic**: <topic>
**Depth**: <quick|standard|deep>
**Sources Consulted**: <count>
### Key Findings
[Structured findings with evidence]
### Comparative Analysis
[Pros/cons of different approaches]
### Recommendations
[Actionable recommendations with rationale]
### Next Steps
- `/arc:core:plan` to plan implementation based on findings
- `/arc:specialized:prd` to write a PRD incorporating research
```
## Error Handling
| Scenario | Action |
|----------|--------|
| Topic too broad | Ask user to narrow scope |
| No external providers | Continue with Claude-only research |
| Low confidence findings | Flag uncertainty, recommend deeper research |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!