Skip to content
Back to skills

Research And Incorporate Rjmurillo Ai Agents 6eda0be0

ASecurity

Research external topics, create comprehensive analysis, determine project

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 2, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 2, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill research-and-incorporate-rjmurillo-ai-agents-6eda0be0 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Research And Incorporate Rjmurillo Ai Agents 6eda0be0?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Research And Incorporate Rjmurillo Ai Agents 6eda0be0
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-research-and-incorporate-rjmurillo-ai-agents-6eda0/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-research-and-incorporate-rjmurillo-ai-agents-6eda0)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: research-and-incorporate
version: 1.0.0
description: Research external topics, create comprehensive analysis, determine project
  applicability, and incorporate learnings into Serena and Forgetful memory systems.
  Transforms knowledge into searchable, actionable project context.
license: MIT
model: claude-opus-4-5
metadata:
  timelessness: 8/10
  source: Chesterton's Fence research workflow (Session 203)
---
# Research and Incorporate

Transform external knowledge into actionable, searchable project context through structured research, analysis, and memory integration.

## Quick Start

```text
/research-and-incorporate

Topic: Chesterton's Fence
Context: Decision-making principle for understanding existing systems before changing them
URLs: https://fs.blog/chestertons-fence/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton
```

| Input | Output | Duration |
|-------|--------|----------|
| Topic + Context + URLs | Analysis doc + Serena memory + 5-10 Forgetful memories | 20-40 min |

## Triggers

- `/research-and-incorporate` - Main invocation
- "research and incorporate {topic}" - Natural language
- "study {topic} and add to memory" - Alternative phrasing
- "deep dive on {topic}" - Research focus
- "learn about {topic} for the project" - Project integration focus

## Parameters

| Parameter | Required | Description |
|-----------|----------|-------------|
| `TOPIC` | Yes | Subject to research (e.g., "Chesterton's Fence") |
| `CONTEXT` | Yes | Why this matters to the project |
| `URLS` | No | Comma-separated source URLs |

## Workflow Overview

```text
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: RESEARCH (BLOCKING)                                    │
│ • Check existing knowledge (Serena + Forgetful)                 │
│ • Fetch URLs with quote extraction                              │
│ • Web search for additional context                             │
│ • Synthesize: principles, frameworks, examples, failure modes   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 2: ANALYSIS DOCUMENT (BLOCKING)                           │
│ • Write 3000-5000 word analysis to .agents/analysis/            │
│ • Include: concepts, frameworks, applications, failure modes    │
│ • Verify: 3+ examples, 3+ failure modes, 2+ relationships       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 3: APPLICABILITY (BLOCKING)                               │
│ • Map integration points: agents, protocols, memory, skills     │
│ • Propose applications with effort estimates                    │
│ • Prioritize: High/Medium/Low based on project goals            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 4: MEMORY INTEGRATION (BLOCKING)                          │
│ • Create Serena project memory with cross-references            │
│ • Create 5-10 atomic Forgetful memories (importance 7-10)       │
│ • Link memories to related concepts (auto + manual)             │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 5: ACTION ITEMS                                           │
│ • Create GitHub issue if implementation work identified         │
│ • Document in session log                                       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

## Quality Gates (BLOCKING)

| Gate | Requirement | Phase |
|------|-------------|-------|
| Research depth | Core principles + frameworks + 3 examples | 1 |
| Analysis length | 3000-5000 words minimum | 2 |
| Concrete examples | 3+ with context and outcomes | 2 |
| Failure modes | 3+ anti-patterns with corrections | 2 |
| Relationships | 2+ connections to existing concepts | 2 |
| Memory atomicity | Each memory <2000 chars, ONE concept | 4 |
| Memory count | 5-10 Forgetful memories created | 4 |

## Verification Checklist

After completion, verify:

- [ ] Analysis document exists at `.agents/analysis/{topic-slug}.md`
- [ ] Analysis is 3000-5000 words with concrete examples
- [ ] Applicability section documents integration opportunities
- [ ] Serena memory created with cross-references
- [ ] 5-10 Forgetful memories created (importance 7-10)
- [ ] Memories linked to related concepts
- [ ] Each memory is atomic (<2000 chars, one concept)
- [ ] Action items documented (issue or next steps)

## Anti-Patterns

| Avoid | Why | Instead |
|-------|-----|---------|
| Superficial research | Surface definitions miss actionable insights | Dig into frameworks, examples, failure modes |
| Missing applicability | Research without integration is wasted | Every insight must show HOW it applies |
| Non-atomic memories | >2000 chars or multiple concepts pollutes graph | ONE concept per memory |
| Disconnected knowledge | Orphaned artifacts aren't discoverable | Link memories to related concepts |
| Template over-compliance | Forcing irrelevant sections wastes tokens | Organize for the topic, not the template |
| Skipping verification | Quality gates exist for a reason | Verify each phase before proceeding |

## Related Skills

| Skill | Relationship |
|-------|--------------|
| `using-forgetful-memory` | Memory creation best practices |
| `encode-repo-serena` | Similar but for codebase analysis |
| `exploring-knowledge-graph` | Navigate created knowledge |
| `memory` | Search and retrieve incorporated knowledge |

## References

| Document | Content |
|----------|---------|
| [workflow.md](references/workflow.md) | Detailed phase workflows with templates |
| [memory-templates.md](references/memory-templates.md) | Forgetful memory structure templates |

## Extension Points

1. **Additional research sources**: Add MCP tools for specialized domains
2. **Custom analysis templates**: Topic-specific document structures
3. **Automated validation**: Scripts to verify memory atomicity
4. **Integration hooks**: Connect to ADR review for architecture topics

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.