Systematically resolve questions - determine if answerable, gather evidence
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill question-resolver --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Question Resolver?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-question-resolver)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: question-resolver
description: Systematically resolve questions - determine if answerable, gather evidence
category: Thinking Analysis
---
# Skill: question-resolver
## What I do
I manage the process of finding answers to technical and domain-specific questions. I ensure that every question is classified, systematically researched using appropriate tools, and documented once resolved.
## When to use me
- When faced with an unknown API, library, or codebase pattern
- To resolve ambiguity in user requests or requirements
- During research spikes to understand a new technology
- To track "known unknowns" that need resolution before proceeding
## Core principles
1. **Classify first** — Is it answerable now (documentation), through research (spikes/data), or unanswerable (requires stakeholder input)?
2. **Structured investigation** — Use a methodical approach: hypothesise, search, verify.
3. **Gather evidence** — Rely on documentation, code, or experimental results rather than hearsay.
4. **Document the "why"** — Once resolved, record the answer and the evidence that supports it.
## Patterns & examples
**Question Log Template:**
| Question | Type (Doc/Spike/Stake) | Priority | Resolution Status | Link to Evidence |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| "Does library X support IPv6 natively?" | Doc | High | Resolved | [Link to API Doc] |
| "What is the max latency our users accept?" | Stake | Medium | Pending | N/A |
**Escalation Triggers:**
- **Stuck:** 30+ minutes without a clear path forward → Escalate or shift approach.
- **Ambiguous:** Requirement contradicts existing system behaviour → Escalate to stakeholder.
- **Contradictory:** Documentation differs from actual code behaviour → Trust code, but verify why.
## Anti-patterns to avoid
- ❌ **Rabbit holing** — Spending hours researching a low-priority question.
- ❌ **The "I think" trap** — Accepting a plausible answer without actual verification.
- ❌ **Ignoring "known unknowns"** — Proceeding with a plan while key questions remain unanswered.
## KB Reference
`~/vaults/baphled/3. Resources/Knowledge Base/AI Development System/Skills/Thinking-Analysis/Question Resolver.md`
## Related skills
- `critical-thinking` — Validating the answers found
- `assumption-tracker` — Identifying the questions that need to be asked
- `knowledge-base` — Searching for existing answers
- `epistemic-rigor` — Distinguishing between theories and facts
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!