Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill project-stage-detect --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Project Stage Detect?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-project-stage-detect)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: project-stage-detect
description: "Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts."
argument-hint: "[optional: role filter like 'programmer' or 'designer']"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
---
# Project Stage Detection
This skill scans your project to determine its current development stage, completeness
of artifacts, and gaps that need attention. It's especially useful when:
- Starting with an existing project
- Onboarding to a codebase
- Checking what's missing before a milestone
- Understanding "where are we?"
---
## Workflow
### 1. Scan Key Directories
Analyze project structure and content:
**Design Documentation** (`design/`):
- Count GDD files in `design/gdd/*.md`
- Check for game-concept.md, game-pillars.md
- Analyze completeness (Overview, Detailed Design, Edge Cases, etc.)
- Count narrative docs in `design/narrative/`
- Count level designs in `design/levels/`
**Source Code** (`src/`):
- Count source files (language-agnostic)
- Identify major systems (directories with 5+ files)
- Check for core/, gameplay/, ai/, networking/, ui/ directories
- Estimate lines of code (rough scale)
**Production Artifacts** (`production/`):
- Check for active sprint plans
- Look for milestone definitions
- Find roadmap documents
**Prototypes** (`prototypes/`):
- Count prototype directories
- Check for READMEs (documented vs undocumented)
- Assess if prototypes are archived or active
**Architecture Docs** (`docs/architecture/`):
- Count ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
- Check for overview/index documents
**Tests** (`tests/`):
- Count test files
- Estimate test coverage (rough heuristic)
### 2. Classify Project Stage
Based on scanned artifacts, determine stage:
| Stage | Indicators |
|-------|-----------|
| **Concept** | No code or minimal prototype, maybe idea docs |
| **Pre-production** | Design docs started, prototypes, no main src/ |
| **Production** | Active src/, sprint plans, growing systems |
| **Post-Launch** | Released, production/ has release history, maintenance focus |
### 3. Collaborative Gap Identification
**DO NOT** just list missing files. Instead, **ask clarifying questions**:
- "I see combat code (`src/gameplay/combat/`) but no `design/gdd/combat-system.md`. Was this prototyped first, or should we reverse-document?"
- "You have 15 ADRs but no architecture overview. Should I create one to help new contributors?"
- "No sprint plans in `production/`. Are you tracking work elsewhere (Jira, Trello, etc.)?"
- "Prototypes directory has 3 projects with no READMEs. Were these experiments, or do they need documentation?"
### 4. Generate Stage Report
Use template: `docs/templates/project-stage-report.md`
**Report structure**:
```markdown
# Project Stage Analysis
**Date**: [date]
**Stage**: [Concept/Pre-production/Production/Post-Launch]
## Completeness Overview
- Design: [X%] ([N] docs, [gaps])
- Code: [X%] ([N] files, [systems])
- Architecture: [X%] ([N] ADRs, [gaps])
- Production: [X%] ([status])
- Tests: [X%] ([coverage estimate])
## Gaps Identified
1. [Gap description + clarifying question]
2. [Gap description + clarifying question]
## Recommended Next Steps
[Priority-ordered list based on stage and role]
```
### 5. Role-Filtered Recommendations (Optional)
If user provided a role argument (e.g., `/project-stage-detect programmer`):
**Programmer**:
- Focus on architecture docs, test coverage, missing ADRs
- Code-to-docs gaps
**Designer**:
- Focus on GDD completeness, missing design sections
- Prototype documentation
**Producer**:
- Focus on sprint plans, milestone tracking, roadmap
- Cross-team coordination docs
**General** (no role):
- Holistic view of all gaps
- Highest-priority items across domains
### 6. Request Approval Before Writing
**Collaborative protocol**:
```
I've analyzed your project. Here's what I found:
[Show summary]
Gaps identified:
1. [Gap 1 + question]
2. [Gap 2 + question]
Recommended next steps:
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]
May I write the full stage analysis to docs/project-stage-report.md?
```
Wait for user approval before creating the file.
---
## Example Usage
```bash
# General project analysis
/project-stage-detect
# Programmer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect programmer
# Designer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect designer
```
---
## Follow-Up Actions
After generating the report, suggest relevant next steps:
- **Missing design docs?** → `/reverse-document design src/[system]`
- **Missing architecture docs?** → `/architecture-decision` or `/reverse-document architecture`
- **Prototypes need documentation?** → `/reverse-document concept prototypes/[name]`
- **No sprint plan?** → `/sprint-plan`
- **Approaching milestone?** → `/milestone-review`
---
## Collaborative Protocol
This skill follows the collaborative design principle:
1. **Question First**: Ask about gaps, don't assume
2. **Present Options**: "Should I create X, or is it tracked elsewhere?"
3. **User Decides**: Wait for direction
4. **Show Draft**: Display report summary
5. **Get Approval**: "May I write to docs/project-stage-report.md?"
**Never** silently write files. **Always** show findings and ask before creating artifacts.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!