Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Project Stage Detect?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-project-stage-detect)
---
name: project-stage-detect
description: "Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts."
argument-hint: "[optional: role filter like 'programmer' or 'designer']"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
---
# Project Stage Detection
This skill scans your project to determine its current development stage, completeness
of artifacts, and gaps that need attention. It's especially useful when:
- Starting with an existing project
- Onboarding to a codebase
- Checking what's missing before a milestone
- Understanding "where are we?"
---
## Workflow
### 1. Scan Key Directories
Analyze project structure and content:
**Design Documentation** (`design/`):
- Count GDD files in `design/gdd/*.md`
- Check for game-concept.md, game-pillars.md
- Analyze completeness (Overview, Detailed Design, Edge Cases, etc.)
- Count narrative docs in `design/narrative/`
- Count level designs in `design/levels/`
**Source Code** (`src/`):
- Count source files (language-agnostic)
- Identify major systems (directories with 5+ files)
- Check for core/, gameplay/, ai/, networking/, ui/ directories
- Estimate lines of code (rough scale)
**Production Artifacts** (`production/`):
- Check for active sprint plans
- Look for milestone definitions
- Find roadmap documents
**Prototypes** (`prototypes/`):
- Count prototype directories
- Check for READMEs (documented vs undocumented)
- Assess if prototypes are archived or active
**Architecture Docs** (`docs/architecture/`):
- Count ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
- Check for overview/index documents
**Tests** (`tests/`):
- Count test files
- Estimate test coverage (rough heuristic)
### 2. Classify Project Stage
Based on scanned artifacts, determine stage:
| Stage | Indicators |
|-------|-----------|
| **Concept** | No code or minimal prototype, maybe idea docs |
| **Pre-production** | Design docs started, prototypes, no main src/ |
| **Production** | Active src/, sprint plans, growing systems |
| **Post-Launch** | Released, production/ has release history, maintenance focus |
### 3. Collaborative Gap Identification
**DO NOT** just list missing files. Instead, **ask clarifying questions**:
- "I see combat code (`src/gameplay/combat/`) but no `design/gdd/combat-system.md`. Was this prototyped first, or should we reverse-document?"
- "You have 15 ADRs but no architecture overview. Should I create one to help new contributors?"
- "No sprint plans in `production/`. Are you tracking work elsewhere (Jira, Trello, etc.)?"
- "Prototypes directory has 3 projects with no READMEs. Were these experiments, or do they need documentation?"
### 4. Generate Stage Report
Use template: `docs/templates/project-stage-report.md`
**Report structure**:
```markdown
# Project Stage Analysis
**Date**: [date]
**Stage**: [Concept/Pre-production/Production/Post-Launch]
## Completeness Overview
- Design: [X%] ([N] docs, [gaps])
- Code: [X%] ([N] files, [systems])
- Architecture: [X%] ([N] ADRs, [gaps])
- Production: [X%] ([status])
- Tests: [X%] ([coverage estimate])
## Gaps Identified
1. [Gap description + clarifying question]
2. [Gap description + clarifying question]
## Recommended Next Steps
[Priority-ordered list based on stage and role]
```
### 5. Role-Filtered Recommendations (Optional)
If user provided a role argument (e.g., `/project-stage-detect programmer`):
**Programmer**:
- Focus on architecture docs, test coverage, missing ADRs
- Code-to-docs gaps
**Designer**:
- Focus on GDD completeness, missing design sections
- Prototype documentation
**Producer**:
- Focus on sprint plans, milestone tracking, roadmap
- Cross-team coordination docs
**General** (no role):
- Holistic view of all gaps
- Highest-priority items across domains
### 6. Request Approval Before Writing
**Collaborative protocol**:
```
I've analyzed your project. Here's what I found:
[Show summary]
Gaps identified:
1. [Gap 1 + question]
2. [Gap 2 + question]
Recommended next steps:
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]
May I write the full stage analysis to docs/project-stage-report.md?
```
Wait for user approval before creating the file.
---
## Example Usage
```bash
# General project analysis
/project-stage-detect
# Programmer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect programmer
# Designer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect designer
```
---
## Follow-Up Actions
After generating the report, suggest relevant next steps:
- **Missing design docs?** → `/reverse-document design src/[system]`
- **Missing architecture docs?** → `/architecture-decision` or `/reverse-document architecture`
- **Prototypes need documentation?** → `/reverse-document concept prototypes/[name]`
- **No sprint plan?** → `/sprint-plan`
- **Approaching milestone?** → `/milestone-review`
---
## Collaborative Protocol
This skill follows the collaborative design principle:
1. **Question First**: Ask about gaps, don't assume
2. **Present Options**: "Should I create X, or is it tracked elsewhere?"
3. **User Decides**: Wait for direction
4. **Show Draft**: Display report summary
5. **Get Approval**: "May I write to docs/project-stage-report.md?"
**Never** silently write files. **Always** show findings and ask before creating artifacts.