Produces prioritized triage report from open GitHub issues, PRs, and discussions. Use when reviewing community backlog.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill ln-911-github-triager --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ln 911 Github Triager?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-ln-911-github-triager)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ln-911-github-triager
description: "Produces prioritized triage report from open GitHub issues, PRs, and discussions. Use when reviewing community backlog."
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Bash, Read
---
> **Paths:** File paths (`references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to this skill directory.
# ln-911-github-triager
**Type:** L3 Worker (standalone)
**Category:** 9XX Community Engagement
**Invocation:** Standalone or as part of a broader community triage workflow
Scans all open issues, PRs, and discussions in the current repository. Categorizes by urgency. Produces an actionable triage report.
---
## Arguments
`$ARGUMENTS` controls scope and staleness threshold:
| Token | Effect | Default |
|-------|--------|---------|
| `issues` | Scan issues only | All three |
| `prs` | Scan PRs only | All three |
| `discussions` | Scan discussions only | All three |
| Number (e.g., `14`) | Staleness threshold in days | 7 |
| `issues 30` | Combine: scope + threshold | -- |
| `summary` | Compact output for coordinator: skip Phase 4 preview, return red flags + priority counts + metrics only | Full interactive report |
Parse `$ARGUMENTS`: extract scope tokens (`issues`, `prs`, `discussions`), numeric threshold, and `summary` flag. If no scope tokens, scan all three. If no number, default to 7 days.
---
## Phase 0: GitHub Discovery
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/community_github_discovery.md`
Execute the discovery protocol. Extract:
- `{owner}/{repo}` for `--repo` flag and URLs
- `maintainer` login (authenticated user) for maintainer detection
- Verify `gh` is authenticated
Load strategy: check `docs/community_engagement_strategy.md` in target project, fallback to `references/community_strategy_template.md`. Extract Section 5 (Engagement Metrics) for targets and red flags.
---
## Phase 1: Fetch Data
Run these `gh` commands based on scope. Execute all applicable fetches in parallel.
### 1a. Issues
```bash
gh issue list --repo {owner}/{repo} --state open --limit 100 --json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,author,comments,assignees
```
### 1b. Pull Requests
```bash
gh pr list --repo {owner}/{repo} --state open --limit 100 --json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,author,reviewDecision,reviewRequests,isDraft,comments,assignees
```
### 1c. Discussions (GraphQL)
```bash
gh api graphql -f query='
query($owner: String!, $name: String!) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $name) {
discussions(first: 100, states: OPEN) {
nodes {
number
title
category { name }
createdAt
updatedAt
author { login }
answerChosenAt
labels(first: 5) { nodes { name } }
comments(first: 20) {
totalCount
nodes {
author { login }
createdAt
}
}
}
}
}
}
' -f owner="{owner}" -f name="{repo}"
```
**Gate:** If all sources return zero items, report "No open items. Triage complete." and stop.
---
## Phase 2: Classify Each Item
For every fetched item, evaluate these conditions. An item can match multiple -- use highest priority.
### Priority Matrix
| Priority | Condition | Applies to |
|----------|-----------|------------|
| **P0 Critical** | Label contains `bug` AND no assignee | Issues |
| **P0 Critical** | Label contains `breaking` | Issues, PRs |
| **P1 Urgent** | Author != maintainer AND zero comments from maintainer | Issues, Discussions |
| **P1 Urgent** | Q&A discussion with `answerChosenAt` is null AND author != maintainer | Discussions |
| **P1 Urgent** | `reviewDecision` is null or `REVIEW_REQUIRED` | PRs |
| **P2 Stale** | No activity for > threshold days (`updatedAt` older than threshold) | All |
| **P3 Monitor** | PR marked as draft (`isDraft` is true) | PRs |
| **P3 Monitor** | Author == maintainer AND 0 community replies | Discussions |
| **P4 Info** | Items not matching any above condition | All |
### Maintainer Detection
The maintainer login comes from Phase 0 discovery (`viewer.login`). An item "has maintainer reply" if any comment's `author.login` equals the maintainer login.
For issues: check `comments` array authors. For discussions: check `comments.nodes[].author.login`.
### Staleness Calculation
Days since last activity: `(today - updatedAt)` in days. Compare against threshold (default 7, or from `$ARGUMENTS`).
### Label Urgency Signals
Labels that elevate priority: `bug`, `breaking`, `security`, `urgent`.
Labels that signal engagement opportunity (not urgency): `help wanted`, `good first issue`.
---
## Phase 3: Engagement Metrics
Calculate aggregate metrics per strategy Section 5:
| Metric | Calculation | Target | Red Flag |
|--------|-------------|--------|----------|
| Time to First Response | Avg(first maintainer comment - item created) for items WITH reply | <24h | >72h |
| Unanswered discussions | Count where author != maintainer AND no maintainer comment AND age > threshold | 0 | Any >7 days |
| Community-to-maintainer ratio | Non-maintainer comments / maintainer comments across all items | >0.3 | 0 |
| New discussions this month | Discussions created in last 30 days | >2 | 0 |
| Zero-engagement items | Items with 0 comments total | -- | -- |
---
## Phase 4: Preview Table
If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `summary` → skip this phase entirely. Output compact summary (red flags, priority counts per category, health metrics table) and stop. Do NOT compose the full Phase 5 report.
**Otherwise (standalone mode):** present a compact summary table of ALL classified items for user review. **Wait for user approval before proceeding to Phase 5.**
```
### Triage Preview -- {total count} items found
| # | Type | Title | Priority | Age | Key Signal |
|---|------|-------|----------|-----|------------|
| {number} | {Issue/PR/Discussion} | {title (truncated to 50 chars)} | {P0/P1/P2/P3/P4} | {days}d | {short reason} |
```
Sort by priority (P0 first), then by age (oldest first) within each priority group.
After presenting, ask the user:
- Confirm priorities look correct
- Whether to exclude any items from the full report
- Whether to adjust the staleness threshold
Proceed to Phase 5 only after user confirms.
---
## Phase 5: Compose Report
Present the full triage report in this format:
```
## GitHub Triage Report -- {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Scope:** {issues/PRs/discussions or "all"} | **Threshold:** {N} days | **Open items:** {total count}
```
### Red Flag Alerts
If any red flags from Phase 3 are triggered, add BEFORE Health Metrics:
```
> [!WARNING]
> **Red flags detected:**
> - {description, e.g., "2 unanswered discussions older than 7 days"}
```
### Health Metrics Table
```
| Metric | Value | Target | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Unanswered (>{N}d) | {count} | 0 | {OK / RED FLAG} |
| Avg first response | {hours}h | <24h | {OK / RED FLAG} |
| Community:maintainer ratio | {ratio} | >0.3 | {OK / RED FLAG} |
| New discussions (30d) | {count} | >2 | {OK / RED FLAG} |
| Zero-engagement items | {count} | -- | {count} |
```
### Priority Tables
For each priority P0..P3, show header with count. If count is 0, show header `(0)` and skip table.
**P0 Critical:**
| # | Type | Title | Labels | Age | Action Needed |
|---|------|-------|--------|-----|---------------|
**P1 Urgent:**
| # | Type | Title | Author | Age | Why |
|---|------|-------|--------|-----|-----|
**P2 Stale:**
| # | Type | Title | Last Activity | Days Stale |
|---|------|-------|---------------|------------|
**P3 Monitor:**
| # | Type | Title | Note |
|---|------|-------|------|
**P4 Info:** Do NOT list individually -- only include in total count.
### Recommended Actions
```
### Recommended Actions
1. **Respond:** {items needing maintainer reply, with GitHub URLs}
2. **Review:** {PRs needing review, with GitHub URLs}
3. **Close or bump:** {stale items -- suggest close if resolved, bump if relevant}
4. **Engage:** {items that could benefit from community call-to-action}
```
### Formatting Rules
- Sort items within each priority group by age (oldest first)
- URL format: `https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/{issues|discussions|pull}/{number}`
- Dates in `YYYY-MM-DD`, ages in days
- All items in Recommended Actions must have direct GitHub URLs
---
## Rules
- **Read-only:** this skill fetches and reports -- never create, modify, or close any GitHub item
- **No publishing:** do not create issues, comments, labels, or any other GitHub state change
- **Maintainer login:** from Phase 0 discovery (authenticated user)
- **Default threshold:** 7 days (per strategy Section 5)
- **Rate limits:** if GraphQL rate limit hit, report partial results with a warning
---
## Definition of Done
- [ ] GitHub data fetched for all scoped item types (issues/PRs/discussions)
- [ ] Every item classified by priority (P0-P4)
- [ ] Engagement metrics calculated per strategy targets
- [ ] Report composed (full interactive report OR compact summary for coordinator)
---
**Version:** 1.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-03-13
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!