L3 Worker. Analyzes single pattern implementation, calculates 4 scores (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation), identifies gaps and issues. Usually invoked by ln-640, can also analyze a specific pattern on user request.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill ln-641-pattern-analyzer-levnikolaevich-claude-code-skills-5 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ln 641 Pattern Analyzer Levnikolaevich Claude Code Skills 5?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-ln-641-pattern-analyzer-levnikolaevich-claude-code-eee6d63e)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ln-641-pattern-analyzer
description: L3 Worker. Analyzes single pattern implementation, calculates 4 scores (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation), identifies gaps and issues. Usually invoked by ln-640, can also analyze a specific pattern on user request.
---
> **Paths:** File paths (`shared/`, `references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
# Pattern Analyzer
L3 Worker that analyzes a single architectural pattern against best practices and calculates 4 scores.
## Purpose & Scope
- Analyze ONE pattern per invocation (receives pattern name, locations, best practices from coordinator)
- Find all implementations in codebase (Glob/Grep)
- Validate implementation exists and works
- Calculate 4 scores: compliance, completeness, quality, implementation
- Identify gaps and issues with severity and effort estimates
- Return structured analysis result to coordinator
**Out of Scope** (owned by ln-624-code-quality-auditor):
- Cyclomatic complexity thresholds (>10, >20)
- Method/class length thresholds (>50, >100, >500 lines)
- Quality Score focuses on pattern-specific quality (SOLID within pattern, pattern-level smells), not generic code metrics
## Input (from ln-640 coordinator)
```
- pattern: string # Pattern name (e.g., "Job Processing")
- locations: string[] # Known file paths/directories
- bestPractices: object # Best practices from MCP Ref/Context7/WebSearch
- output_dir: string # e.g., "docs/project/.audit/ln-640/{YYYY-MM-DD}"
```
> **Note:** All patterns arrive pre-verified (passed ln-640 Phase 1d applicability gate with >= 2 structural components confirmed).
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Find Implementations
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/pattern_library.md` — use "Pattern Detection (Grep)" table for detection keywords per pattern.
```
IF pattern.source == "adaptive":
# Pattern discovered by coordinator Phase 1b — evidence already provided
files = pattern.evidence.files
SKIP detection keyword search (already done in Phase 1b)
ELSE:
# Baseline pattern — use library detection keywords
files = Glob(locations)
additional = Grep("{pattern_keywords}", "**/*.{ts,js,py,rb,cs,java}")
files = deduplicate(files + additional)
```
### Phase 2: Read and Analyze Code
```
FOR EACH file IN files (limit: 10 key files):
Read(file)
Extract: components, patterns, error handling, logging, tests
```
### Phase 3: Calculate 4 Scores
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/scoring_rules.md` — follow Detection column for each criterion.
| Score | Source in scoring_rules.md | Max |
|-------|---------------------------|-----|
| Compliance | "Compliance Score" section — industry standard, naming, conventions, anti-patterns | 100 |
| Completeness | "Completeness Score" section — required components table (per pattern), error handling, tests | 100 |
| Quality | "Quality Score" section — method length, complexity, code smells, SOLID | 100 |
| Implementation | "Implementation Score" section — compiles, production usage, integration, monitoring | 100 |
**Scoring process for each criterion:**
1. Run the Detection Grep/Glob from scoring_rules.md
2. If matches found → add points per criterion
3. If anti-pattern/smell detected → subtract per deduction table
4. Document evidence: file path + line for each score justification
### Phase 4: Identify Issues and Gaps
```
FOR EACH bestPractice NOT implemented:
issues.append({
severity: "HIGH" | "MEDIUM" | "LOW",
category: "compliance" | "completeness" | "quality" | "implementation",
issue: description,
suggestion: how to fix,
effort: "S" | "M" | "L"
})
gaps = {
missingComponents: required components not found in code,
inconsistencies: conflicting or incomplete implementations
}
```
### Phase 5: Calculate Score
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `shared/references/audit_scoring.md` for unified scoring formula.
**Primary score** uses penalty formula (same as all workers):
```
penalty = (critical × 2.0) + (high × 1.0) + (medium × 0.5) + (low × 0.2)
score = max(0, 10 - penalty)
```
**Diagnostic sub-scores** (0-100 each) are calculated separately and reported in AUDIT-META for diagnostic purposes only:
- compliance, completeness, quality, implementation
### Phase 6: Write Report
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md` for file format (ln-640 section: extended AUDIT-META + DATA-EXTENDED).
```
# Build pattern name slug: "Job Processing" → "job-processing"
slug = pattern.name.lower().replace(" ", "-")
# Build markdown report in memory with:
# - AUDIT-META (extended: score [penalty-based] + diagnostic score_compliance/completeness/quality/implementation)
# - Checks table (compliance_check, completeness_check, quality_check, implementation_check)
# - Findings table (issues sorted by severity)
# - DATA-EXTENDED: {pattern, codeReferences, gaps, recommendations}
Write to {output_dir}/641-pattern-{slug}.md (atomic single Write call)
```
### Phase 7: Return Summary
```
Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-640/{YYYY-MM-DD}/641-pattern-job-processing.md
Score: 7.9/10 (C:72 K:85 Q:68 I:90) | Issues: 3 (H:1 M:2 L:0)
```
## Critical Rules
- **One pattern only:** Analyze only the pattern passed by coordinator
- **Read before score:** Never score without reading actual code
- **Detection-based scoring:** Use Grep/Glob patterns from scoring_rules.md, not assumptions
- **Effort estimates:** Always provide S/M/L for each issue
- **Code references:** Always include file paths for findings
## Definition of Done
- All implementations found via Glob/Grep (using pattern_library.md keywords or adaptive evidence)
- Key files read and analyzed
- 4 scores calculated using scoring_rules.md Detection patterns
- Issues identified with severity, category, suggestion, effort
- Gaps documented (missing components, inconsistencies)
- Recommendations provided
- Report written to `{output_dir}/641-pattern-{slug}.md` (atomic single Write call)
- Summary returned to coordinator
## Reference Files
- **Worker report template:** `shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md`
- Scoring rules: `../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/scoring_rules.md`
- Pattern library: `../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/pattern_library.md`
---
**Version:** 2.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-02-08
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!