Use when an evaluation coordinator needs normalized findings from target artifacts and research evidence.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill ln-312-review-findings-worker --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ln 312 Review Findings Worker?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-ln-312-review-findings-worker)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ln-312-review-findings-worker
description: "Use when an evaluation coordinator needs normalized findings from target artifacts and research evidence."
license: MIT
---
> **Paths:** File paths (`references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to this skill directory.
**Type:** L3 Worker
**Category:** 3XX Planning
# Review Findings Worker
## Mandatory Read
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/evaluation_worker_runtime_contract.md`, `references/evaluation_summary_contract.md`
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `../ln-310-multi-agent-validator/references/phase2_research_audit.md`, `../ln-310-multi-agent-validator/references/penalty_points.md`
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `../ln-310-multi-agent-validator/references/premortem_validation.md`, `../ln-310-multi-agent-validator/references/cross_reference_validation.md`
## Purpose
- analyze the target artifact or diff
- convert evidence into normalized findings
- for `mode=story`: calculate penalty points across 30 criteria per `phase2_research_audit.md`
- for `mode=plan_review`: evaluate criteria #5, #6, #21, #28 only (no penalty accumulation)
- avoid narrative-only review output
## Mode Gate
- `mode=story`: full pipeline — pre-mortem, cross-reference, penalty points across 30 criteria, build fix plan
- `mode=plan_review`: applicability check, stack detection, evaluate criteria #5 (standards), #6 (library versions), #21 (alternatives), #28 (library features) only, normalize findings without penalty accumulation
## Runtime
Runtime family:
- `evaluation-worker-runtime`
Required manifest fields:
- `identifier`
- `phase_order`
- `summary_kind=review-findings`
- `operation=findings`
Recommended `phase_order`:
1. `PHASE_0_CONFIG`
2. `PHASE_1_LOAD_TARGET`
3. `PHASE_2_PREMORTEM` (mode=story, complexity >= Medium)
4. `PHASE_3_CROSS_REFERENCE` (mode=story, multi-story Epic)
5. `PHASE_4_CRITERIA_AUDIT`
6. `PHASE_5_PENALTY_CALCULATION` (mode=story only)
7. `PHASE_6_NORMALIZE_FINDINGS`
8. `PHASE_7_WRITE_SUMMARY`
9. `PHASE_8_SELF_CHECK`
## Workflow
### Phase 0: Config
Load runtime manifest, target identifiers, and any linked research artifact paths.
### Phase 1: Load Target
Load only the target artifacts needed for the review scope.
### Phase 2: Pre-mortem (mode=story)
Execute pre-mortem analysis per `premortem_validation.md`:
1. Skip for trivial Stories (1-2 tasks, no external deps, known tech).
2. Execute for Stories with complexity >= Medium (3+ tasks, external deps, or unfamiliar tech).
3. Tigers (evidence-based risks) feed Risk criterion #20 — add to risk table BEFORE penalty calc.
4. Elephants (unstated assumptions) feed Assumptions criterion #24 — add with `[pre-mortem]` tag, Confidence=LOW.
5. Paper Tigers (fears without evidence) — document and dismiss.
6. Include pre-mortem table in audit report.
### Phase 3: Cross-Reference (mode=story)
Execute cross-reference analysis per `cross_reference_validation.md`:
1. Skip if Epic has only 1 Story or all siblings Done/Canceled.
2. Load sibling Stories via `list_issues(project=Epic.id)`.
3. Check AC overlap (#25): structured traceability first, keyword fallback advisory-only.
4. Check task duplication (#26): structured match primary.
5. Include cross-reference findings in audit report.
### Phase 4: Criteria Audit
1. `mode=story`: evaluate all 30 criteria against Story/Tasks per `phase2_research_audit.md` Auto-Fix Actions Reference.
2. `mode=plan_review`: evaluate criteria #5, #6, #21, #28 only (standards + solution groups).
3. Cross-check claims against provided research evidence when present.
### Phase 5: Penalty Calculation (mode=story)
1. Assign penalty points per violation using severity levels from `phase2_research_audit.md` (CRITICAL=10, HIGH=5, MEDIUM=3, LOW=1).
2. Apply multiple-violation rules per `penalty_points.md` Calculation Rules.
3. Calculate total penalty points.
4. Build fix plan for each violation.
5. Format penalty audit table per `penalty_points.md` Report Format.
### Phase 6: Normalize Findings
Each finding should prefer structured fields such as:
- `id`
- `severity`
- `category`
- `subject`
- `evidence`
- `recommendation`
### Phase 7: Write Summary
Emit `summary_kind=review-findings`.
Payload must include:
- `worker=ln-312`
- `status`
- `operation=findings`
- `warnings`
Prefer these fields when available:
- `findings`
- `metrics.penalty_total` (mode=story)
- `metrics.criteria_violated` (list of criterion numbers)
- `metrics.fix_plan` (array of {criterion, action, severity})
- `metrics.premortem_summary` (when executed)
- `metrics.cross_reference_summary` (when executed)
### Phase 8: Self-Check
1. Remove duplicates.
2. Remove unsupported claims.
3. Verify penalty calculation matches `penalty_points.md` rules (mode=story).
4. Record `pass=true` only after summary write.
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Target artifact loaded
- [ ] Pre-mortem executed or justified as skipped (mode=story)
- [ ] Cross-reference executed or justified as skipped (mode=story)
- [ ] Criteria audit completed (30 for story, #5/#6/#21/#28 for others)
- [ ] Penalty points calculated and fix plan built (mode=story)
- [ ] Findings normalized
- [ ] Unsupported claims removed
- [ ] `review-findings` summary written
- [ ] Self-check passed
**Version:** 1.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-04-10
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!