Skip to content
Back to skills

Layered Recall

ASecurity

Progressive memory recall with 4 scope layers AND 3 depth layers. Scope: identity > project > room > deep. Depth: IDs only > summary > full. 10-50x token savings through fetch-on-confirmation pattern.

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 2, 2026
ai-agentsgosqldatabase

Works with

  • terminal

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 2, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill layered-recall --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Layered Recall?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Layered Recall
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-layered-recall/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-layered-recall)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: layered-recall
description: "Progressive memory recall with 4 scope layers AND 3 depth layers. Scope: identity > project > room > deep. Depth: IDs only > summary > full. 10-50x token savings through fetch-on-confirmation pattern."
---

# Layered Recall

Progressive memory system with **two orthogonal dimensions** of lazy loading:
1. **Scope layers** - What is relevant (identity, project, domain, deep)
2. **Depth layers** - How much detail to fetch (IDs, summary, full)

Combined savings: 10-50x tokens vs eager loading.

## Depth Pattern (Fetch-on-Confirmation)

Instead of loading full memory entries upfront, agents fetch in 3 depths:

```
Depth 1: IDs only        (~10 tokens per match)
  Agent decides which are worth investigating

Depth 2: Summary         (~50 tokens per match)
  Room, type, preview (first 80 chars)
  Agent confirms relevance

Depth 3: Full content    (~500+ tokens per match)
  Only fetched for confirmed matches
```

**Example flow:**
```
1. Agent searches "auth refresh token"
2. Depth 1 returns 8 IDs: d-abc123, d-def456, ...
3. Agent requests Depth 2 for IDs 1-3
4. Sees room=authentication, type=decision, preview="Chose JWT..."
5. Agent confirms IDs 1,3 are relevant
6. Requests Depth 3 only for those 2 entries
7. Gets full content for ~1000 tokens instead of 4000+
```

## The 4 Layers

```
Layer 1: Identity (always loaded, ~200 tokens)
   Who is the user? What are their preferences?

Layer 2: Critical Facts (per-project, ~500 tokens)
   Hard constraints, active decisions, blockers

Layer 3: Room Recall (on-demand, ~1-2K tokens)
   Relevant memories for current task domain

Layer 4: Deep Search (when needed, ~2-5K tokens)
   Full semantic search across all memories
```

## Layer Details

### Layer 1: Identity (~200 tokens, ALWAYS loaded)

Loaded at every session start. Contains:
- User preferences (language, style, autonomy level)
- Global constraints (no emojis, Turkish responses, etc.)
- Tool preferences (which editors, which terminal)

**Source:** `~/.claude/projects/*/memory/user_*.md`

### Layer 2: Critical Facts (~500 tokens, per-project)

Loaded when entering a project directory. Contains:
- Active architectural decisions
- Known blockers and constraints
- Current sprint/milestone goals
- Tech stack and versions

**Source:** `~/.claude/projects/*/memory/project_*.md` + `thoughts/CONTEXT.md`

### Layer 3: Room Recall (~1-2K tokens, on-demand)

Loaded when task domain is detected (auth, database, deploy, etc.). Contains:
- Previous decisions in this domain
- Past errors and fixes
- Patterns that worked
- Patterns that failed

**Source:** Memory palace rooms + `mature-instincts.json` filtered by domain

**Trigger:** Intent classifier detects domain (e.g., "fix the login bug" -> room: authentication)

### Layer 4: Deep Search (~2-5K tokens, explicit)

Only loaded when explicitly needed or when Layers 1-3 don't have enough context. Contains:
- Full semantic search results
- Cross-project pattern matches
- Historical error resolutions
- Archived decisions

**Source:** PostgreSQL vector search + palace cross-wing search

**Trigger:** Agent explicitly queries, or user asks "have we done this before?"

## Recall Flow

```
Session Start
  -> Load Layer 1 (identity)
  -> Detect project -> Load Layer 2 (facts)
  -> User sends prompt
  -> Classify intent/domain -> Load Layer 3 (room)
  -> If insufficient context -> Load Layer 4 (deep)
```

## Token Budget

| Layer | Tokens | When |
|-------|--------|------|
| L1 | ~200 | Always |
| L2 | ~500 | Per project |
| L3 | ~1-2K | Per task domain |
| L4 | ~2-5K | On demand |
| **Total max** | **~8K** | Worst case |

vs. loading everything: ~30-50K tokens

**Savings: 4-6x token reduction**

## Integration

### With Existing Hooks
- `instinct-loader` -> feeds Layer 2 and Layer 3
- `smart-memory-recall` -> implements Layer 3 scoring
- `intent-classifier` -> triggers Layer 3 room selection
- `graph-indexer` -> powers Layer 4 deep search

### With Memory Palace
- Layer 2 pulls from palace wing index
- Layer 3 pulls from palace room drawers
- Layer 4 searches across all wings

### With Agents
- Agents inherit parent's Layer 1-2 context
- Each agent can request Layer 3-4 for their domain
- Agent memories feed back into palace for future recall

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.