This skill supports three modes: Create, Update, and Find.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill decision-quality-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Decision Quality Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-decision-quality-audit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: decision-quality-audit
description: 'This skill supports three modes: Create, Update, and Find.'
---
---
name: decision-quality-audit
description: Create or update an audit of recent decisions for quality
argument-hint: [team, time period, or decision type] or [update path/to/audit.md]
---
## Document Intelligence
This skill supports three modes: **Create**, **Update**, and **Find**.
### Mode Detection
| Signal | Mode | Confidence |
|--------|------|------------|
| "update", "add decisions", "refresh" in input | UPDATE | 100% |
| File path provided | UPDATE | 100% |
| "create", "new", "run" in input | CREATE | 100% |
| "find", "search", "list" | FIND | 100% |
| "the audit", "last audit" | UPDATE | 85% |
| Just team/period/type | CREATE | 60% |
**Threshold**: ≥85% auto-proceed | 70-84% state assumption | <70% ask user
### Mode Behaviors
**CREATE**: Generate complete new audit using template below.
**UPDATE**:
1. Check document registry first, then search user's structure
2. Preserve historical scores and trend data
3. Update with new decisions or findings
4. Show diff summary with score changes
**FIND**: Check registry, then search user's folders for audit reports.
---
Audit **Decision Quality** for a set of recent decisions.
## V2V Context
**Phase 6: Learning & Adaptation Loop** - Decision quality is the core metric for product leadership effectiveness.
## Output Structure
```markdown
# Decision Quality Audit: [Scope]
**Audit Date**: [Date]
**Auditor**: [Name]
**Period**: [Timeframe audited]
**Decisions Reviewed**: [Number]
## Executive Summary
**Overall Decision Quality Score**: [X/5]
**Key Finding**: [One sentence summary]
**Priority Improvement**: [One area to focus on]
## Decisions Audited
| Decision | Date | Owner | Type | Quality Score |
|----------|------|-------|------|---------------|
| [Decision 1] | [Date] | [Owner] | Strategic/Portfolio/Execution | X/5 |
| [Decision 2] | [Date] | [Owner] | Strategic/Portfolio/Execution | X/5 |
## Quality Criteria Assessment
### 1. Clear Ownership
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% of decisions had single accountable owner
- [Other evidence]
### 2. Explicit Options Considered
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% documented alternatives
- [Other evidence]
### 3. Success Criteria Defined
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% had measurable success criteria
- [Other evidence]
### 4. Re-decision Triggers Defined
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% defined when to revisit
- [Other evidence]
### 5. Assumptions Documented
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% had explicit assumptions
- [Other evidence]
### 6. Appropriate Input Gathered
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- X% involved right stakeholders
- [Other evidence]
### 7. Timely Decision-Making
**Score**: [X/5]
**Finding**: [What we found]
**Evidence**:
- Average decision time: X days
- [Other evidence]
## Quality Scorecard
| Criterion | Score | Trend | Priority |
|-----------|-------|-------|----------|
| Clear Ownership | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Options Considered | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Success Criteria | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Re-decision Triggers | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Assumptions Documented | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Appropriate Input | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
| Timely Decision | X/5 | ↑/↓/→ | High/Med/Low |
## Pattern Analysis
### What's Working
| Pattern | Evidence | Impact |
|---------|----------|--------|
| [Pattern] | [Evidence] | [Impact] |
### What Needs Improvement
| Pattern | Evidence | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|----------|--------|----------------|
| [Pattern] | [Evidence] | [Impact] | [Recommendation] |
## Recommendations
### Process Improvements
1. [Recommendation]
### Template/Tool Improvements
1. [Recommendation]
### Training/Coaching Needs
1. [Recommendation]
## Follow-up Actions
| Action | Owner | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|
| [Action] | [Owner] | [Date] |
## Next Audit
**Scheduled**: [Date]
**Focus Areas**: [What to emphasize]
```
## Instructions
1. Gather recent decision records to audit
2. Reference decision records and charters via @file syntax
3. Score objectively against criteria
4. Identify patterns, not just individual issues
5. Save in audits/ folder
6. Offer to create presentation version using /present
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!