Use when Daem0nMCP tools are available - enforces the sacred covenant (commune at session start, seek counsel before changes, inscribe decisions, seal outcomes)
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill daem0nmcp-protocol-dasblueyeddevil-daem0n-mcp-2 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Daem0nmcp Protocol Dasblueyeddevil Daem0n Mcp 2?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-daem0nmcp-protocol-dasblueyeddevil-daem0n-mcp-2)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: daem0nmcp-protocol
description: Use when Daem0nMCP tools are available - enforces the sacred covenant (commune at session start, seek counsel before changes, inscribe decisions, seal outcomes)
---
# The Daem0n's Protocol
## Overview
When Daem0nMCP memory tools are available, you MUST follow this protocol. Memory without discipline is noise.
**Core principle:** Check before you change, record what you decide, track whether it worked.
## Tool Detection
First, verify Daem0nMCP tools are available:
```
Look for these 8 workflow tools in your available tools:
- mcp__daem0nmcp__commune (session start & status)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__consult (pre-action intelligence)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__inscribe (memory writing & linking)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__reflect (outcomes & verification)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__understand (code comprehension)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__govern (rules & triggers)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__explore (graph & discovery)
- mcp__daem0nmcp__maintain (housekeeping & federation)
```
**If tools are NOT available:** This skill does not apply. Proceed normally.
**If tools ARE available:** Follow the protocol below. No exceptions.
## The Protocol
### 1. SESSION START (Non-Negotiable)
```
IMMEDIATELY when you have daem0nmcp tools:
mcp__daem0nmcp__commune(action="briefing")
DO NOT:
- Ask user what they want first
- Skip briefing because "it's a quick task"
- Assume you remember from last session
```
The briefing loads:
- Past decisions and their outcomes
- Warnings and failed approaches to AVOID
- Patterns to FOLLOW
- Git changes since last session
### 2. BEFORE ANY CODE CHANGES
```
BEFORE touching any file:
mcp__daem0nmcp__consult(action="preflight", description="what you're about to do")
OR for specific files:
mcp__daem0nmcp__consult(action="recall_file", file_path="path/to/file")
```
**If preflight returns:**
- **WARNING:** You MUST acknowledge it to the user
- **FAILED APPROACH:** Explain how your approach differs
- **must_not:** These are HARD CONSTRAINTS - do not violate
### 3. AFTER MAKING DECISIONS
```
AFTER every significant decision:
memory_result = mcp__daem0nmcp__inscribe(
action="remember",
category="decision", # or "pattern", "warning", "learning"
content="What you decided",
rationale="Why you decided it",
file_path="relevant/file.py", # optional
tags=["relevant", "tags"]
)
SAVE THE MEMORY ID - you need it for reflect(action="outcome")
```
**Category Guide:**
| Category | Use For | Persistence |
|----------|---------|-------------|
| decision | Architectural/design choices | Decays over 30 days |
| pattern | Recurring approaches to follow | PERMANENT |
| warning | Things to avoid | PERMANENT |
| learning | Lessons from experience | Decays over 30 days |
### 4. AFTER IMPLEMENTATION (Critical)
```
AFTER implementing and testing:
mcp__daem0nmcp__reflect(
action="outcome",
memory_id=<id from inscribe>,
outcome_text="What actually happened",
worked=true # or false
)
```
**FAILURES ARE VALUABLE.** If something doesn't work:
- Record `worked=false` with explanation
- Failed approaches get 1.5x boost in future searches
- You WILL see past mistakes - that's the point
## Red Flags - STOP
- About to edit a file without calling `consult(action="recall_file")`
- Making a significant decision without calling `inscribe(action="remember")`
- Implementation complete but no `reflect(action="outcome")` called
- Preflight returned WARNING but you didn't acknowledge it
- Repeating an approach that previously failed
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "It's a small change" | Small changes compound into big problems |
| "I'll remember later" | You won't. Record now. |
| "Context check is overkill" | 5 seconds now vs hours debugging later |
| "The warning doesn't apply" | Warnings exist because someone failed before |
| "I don't need to record failures" | Failures are the most valuable memories |
## Enforcement (2026 Update)
The Sacred Covenant is now ENFORCED, not advisory:
### What Happens If You Skip Steps
1. **Skip `commune(action="briefing")`**: ALL tools return `COMMUNION_REQUIRED` block
2. **Skip `consult(action="preflight")`**: Mutating tools return `COUNSEL_REQUIRED` block
3. **Each block includes a `remedy`**: The exact tool call to fix it
### Enforcement
Workflow actions are classified:
- **Requires counsel**: `inscribe(action="remember")`, `inscribe(action="remember_batch")`, `govern(action="add_rule")`, `govern(action="update_rule")`, `maintain(action="prune")`, `maintain(action="cleanup")`, `maintain(action="compact")`, `maintain(action="export")`, `maintain(action="import_data")`, `inscribe(action="ingest")`
- **Requires communion**: All other actions except briefing and health
- **Exempt**: `commune(action="briefing")`, `commune(action="health")`
### Preflight Token
After `consult(action="preflight")`, you receive a `preflight_token` in the response.
This is cryptographic proof you consulted the Daem0n.
Token is valid for 5 minutes.
### Parallel Preflight
Before file edits, run these IN PARALLEL for maximum efficiency:
- `consult(action="preflight")` + `consult(action="recall_file")` + `understand(action="impact")`
## Workflow Summary
```
SESSION START
└─> commune(action="briefing")
BEFORE CHANGES
└─> consult(action="preflight", description="what you're doing")
└─> consult(action="recall_file", file_path="path") for specific files
└─> ACKNOWLEDGE any warnings
AFTER DECISIONS
└─> inscribe(action="remember", category=..., content=..., rationale=...)
└─> SAVE the memory_id
└─> inscribe(action="link") if causally related to other decisions
AFTER IMPLEMENTATION
└─> reflect(action="outcome", memory_id=..., outcome_text=..., worked=...)
INVESTIGATING CONTEXT
└─> explore(action="chain") to understand decision history
└─> explore(action="graph") to visualize relationships
```
## Why This Matters
Without protocol discipline:
- You repeat past mistakes
- Decisions get lost between sessions
- Patterns aren't captured
- Failures aren't learned from
- The memory system becomes useless noise
With protocol discipline:
- Past mistakes surface before you repeat them
- Decisions persist across sessions
- Patterns compound into project knowledge
- Failures become learning opportunities
- The AI actually gets smarter over time
## Graph Memory Tools
Memories can be explicitly linked to create a knowledge graph. Use these when decisions are causally related.
### Relationship Types
| Type | Meaning | Example |
|------|---------|---------|
| `led_to` | A caused/resulted in B | "PostgreSQL choice led to connection pooling pattern" |
| `supersedes` | A replaces B (B is outdated) | "New auth flow supersedes old JWT approach" |
| `depends_on` | A requires B to be valid | "Caching strategy depends on database choice" |
| `conflicts_with` | A contradicts B | "Sync processing conflicts with async pattern" |
| `related_to` | General association | "Both relate to authentication" |
### Link Memories
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__inscribe(
action="link",
source_id=<memory_id>,
target_id=<other_memory_id>,
relationship="led_to",
description="Optional context for the link"
)
```
**When to link:**
- A decision directly caused another decision
- A pattern emerged from a specific choice
- An approach supersedes a previous one
### Trace Causal Chains
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__explore(
action="related",
memory_id=<id>,
direction="backward", # "forward", "backward", or "both"
max_depth=5
)
```
**Use cases:**
- "What decisions led to this pattern?" → trace backward
- "What emerged from this architectural choice?" → trace forward
- "Show me the full context around this decision" → trace both
### Visualize the Graph
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__explore(
action="graph",
memory_ids=[1, 2, 3], # OR
topic="authentication",
format="mermaid" # or "json"
)
```
Returns a mermaid diagram or JSON structure showing nodes and edges.
### Remove Links
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__inscribe(
action="unlink",
source_id=<id>,
target_id=<id>,
relationship="led_to"
)
```
## OpenSpec Integration
If the project uses OpenSpec (spec-driven development), the `openspec-daem0n-bridge` skill provides bidirectional integration:
**Auto-detection:** After `get_briefing()`, if `openspec/` directory exists, specs are automatically imported as patterns and rules.
**Before creating proposals:** Use "prepare proposal for [feature]" to query past decisions and failures.
**After archiving changes:** Use "record outcome for [change-id]" to convert completed work to learnings.
See the `openspec-daem0n-bridge` skill for full workflow details.
## Enhanced Search & Indexing (v2.15.0)
### Automatic Tag Inference
Memories now auto-detect tags from content:
- **bugfix**: fix, bug, error, issue, broken, crash
- **tech-debt**: todo, hack, workaround, temporary
- **perf**: cache, performance, slow, fast, optimize
- **warning**: Added automatically for warning category
You don't need to manually tag common patterns.
### Condensed Mode for Large Projects
For projects with many memories, use condensed recall:
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__consult(action="recall", topic="authentication", condensed=True)
```
Returns compressed output (~75% token reduction):
- Content truncated to 150 chars
- Rationale/context stripped
- Ideal for broad surveys before deep dives
### Code Intelligence Tools
**Index your codebase:**
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__understand(action="index") # Index all code entities
```
**Search code semantically:**
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__understand(action="find", query="user authentication")
```
**Analyze change impact:**
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__understand(action="impact", entity_name="UserService.authenticate")
```
### Incremental Indexing
Only re-indexes changed files:
- Uses SHA256 content hashes
- Automatically skips unchanged files
- Entities have stable IDs (survive line changes)
### Enhanced Health Monitoring
```
mcp__daem0nmcp__commune(action="health")
```
Now returns:
- `code_entities_count`: Total indexed entities
- `entities_by_type`: Breakdown by class/function
- `last_indexed_at`: When index was last updated
- `index_stale`: True if >24 hours since last index
## The Bottom Line
**Memory tools exist. Use them correctly.**
Check context. Record decisions. Track outcomes. Link related memories.
This is non-negotiable when Daem0nMCP tools are available.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!