Skip to content
Back to skills

Creating Quality Gates

ASecurity

Establish workflow boundary checklists with clear pass/fail criteria and escalation procedures

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
testinggobashdebuggingapici/cdsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill creating-quality-gates --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Creating Quality Gates?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Creating Quality Gates
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-creating-quality-gates/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-creating-quality-gates)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: Creating Quality Gates
description: Establish workflow boundary checklists with clear pass/fail criteria and escalation procedures
when_to_use: when creating pre-merge checklists, establishing workflow boundaries, building verification procedures, or defining quality gates between development phases
version: 1.0.0
---

# Creating Quality Gates

## Overview

Create structured quality gates at workflow boundaries with clear "Must Pass" vs "Should Review" criteria, exact commands, and escalation procedures.

**Announce at start:** "I'm using the creating-quality-gates skill to establish this quality gate."

## When to Use

- Establishing pre-merge verification
- Creating phase transition gates (design → implement)
- Building deployment checklists
- Defining code review criteria
- Any workflow boundary that needs enforcement

## Core Principle

**Wrong:** Vague criteria ("ensure quality", "review code")
**Right:** Explicit criteria with commands and pass/fail definitions

Quality gates must be:
- **Unambiguous** - Clear what passes/fails
- **Executable** - Exact commands provided
- **Categorized** - Must Pass vs Should Review
- **Actionable** - What to do when things fail

## The Process

### Step 1: Identify the Boundary

Determine where the gate belongs:

| Boundary | Purpose | Example Gate |
|----------|---------|--------------|
| Before merge | Code quality | Pre-merge checklist |
| Before deploy | Production readiness | Deploy checklist |
| After design | Implementation readiness | Design review gate |
| After implement | Test readiness | Implementation complete gate |

### Step 2: List All Checks

Brainstorm everything that should be verified:

- Automated checks (tests, linting, type checking)
- Manual reviews (code quality, documentation)
- Cross-functional checks (security, accessibility)
- Process checks (approvals, tickets updated)

### Step 3: Categorize Checks

Separate into two categories:

**Must Pass (Automated)**
- Binary pass/fail
- Can be automated
- Blocking - cannot proceed if fail
- Examples: tests, linting, type checks

**Should Review (Manual)**
- Requires judgment
- Human review needed
- May be non-blocking
- Examples: code quality, documentation completeness

### Step 4: Write Executable Checks

For each check, provide:

```markdown
### [Check Name]

- [ ] **[What to verify]**
  ```bash
  [exact command to run]
  ```
  Expected: [what success looks like]

  If fails: [what to do]
```

Be specific:
- ❌ "Run tests"
- ✅ "Run unit tests: `cargo test --lib` - Expected: All tests pass (0 failures)"

### Step 5: Document Failure Procedures

For automated checks:

```markdown
### If Automated Checks Fail

**STOP. Do not proceed.**

1. Read the error message carefully
2. Check if recent commit caused failure
3. Fix the issue (don't work around)
4. Re-run full check suite
5. If stuck > 30 minutes, ask for help
```

For manual checks:

```markdown
### If Manual Review Has Issues

| Severity | Action |
|----------|--------|
| Blocking | Must fix before proceeding |
| Non-blocking | Create follow-up task |
| Discussion | Flag for team review |
```

### Step 6: Add Prerequisites and Sign-Off

**Prerequisites** - What must be true before starting:
- All changes committed
- Branch up to date
- Feature complete

**Sign-Off** - How to record completion:
- Who verified
- When verified
- Any exceptions granted

### Step 7: Test the Gate

Verify the gate is usable:

- [ ] All commands work as written
- [ ] Pass/fail criteria are clear
- [ ] Time to complete is reasonable
- [ ] Failure procedures are actionable
- [ ] Someone unfamiliar can follow it

### Step 8: Integrate into Workflow

Add gate to workflow documentation:
- Link from relevant workflow stages
- Add to CI/CD if automatable
- Train team on new gate
- Schedule periodic reviews of gate effectiveness

## Checklist

- [ ] Boundary identified
- [ ] All checks listed
- [ ] Checks categorized (Must Pass / Should Review)
- [ ] Commands are exact and runnable
- [ ] Failure procedures documented
- [ ] Prerequisites specified
- [ ] Sign-off section added
- [ ] Gate tested with fresh eyes
- [ ] Integrated into workflow

## Template Structure

```markdown
# [Workflow Stage] Verification Checklist

**Purpose:** [What this validates]
**When:** [At what point]

## Prerequisites
- [ ] [What must be true first]

## Automated Checks (MUST PASS)

### [Category]
- [ ] **[Check]**
  ```bash
  [command]
  ```
  Expected: [success criteria]

## Manual Verification (SHOULD REVIEW)

### [Category]
- [ ] **[Check]** - [Guidance]

## If Checks Fail
[Procedures]

## Sign-Off
| Category | Status | Notes |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Automated | ✅/❌ | |
| Manual | ✅/⚠️ | |
```

**Use template:** `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}templates/verification-checklist-template.md`

## Anti-Patterns

**Don't:**
- Use vague criteria ("ensure quality")
- Skip the failure procedures
- Mix Must Pass with Should Review
- Make gates so long they get skipped
- Forget to test commands work

**Do:**
- Provide exact commands
- Separate blocking from advisory
- Keep gates focused and timely
- Update when processes change
- Automate what can be automated

## Example: Pre-Merge Gate

```markdown
# Pre-Merge Checklist

## Prerequisites
- [ ] All changes committed
- [ ] Branch rebased on main

## Automated Checks (MUST PASS)

### Tests
- [ ] **Unit tests**
  ```bash
  cargo test --lib
  ```
  Expected: 0 failures

- [ ] **Integration tests**
  ```bash
  cargo nextest run
  ```
  Expected: 0 failures

### Static Analysis
- [ ] **Linting**
  ```bash
  cargo clippy -- -D warnings
  ```
  Expected: 0 warnings

## Manual Verification (SHOULD REVIEW)

### Code Quality
- [ ] No magic numbers without explanation
- [ ] Error handling is appropriate
- [ ] Public APIs are documented

## If Automated Checks Fail
STOP. Fix issues. Re-run all checks.
```

## Related Skills

- **Organizing documentation:** `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}skills/organizing-documentation/SKILL.md`
- **Creating research packages:** `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}skills/creating-research-packages/SKILL.md`
- **Documenting debugging workflows:** `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}skills/documenting-debugging-workflows/SKILL.md`

## References

- Standards: `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}standards/documentation-structure.md`
- Template: `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}templates/verification-checklist-template.md`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.