Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Contract Review?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-contract-review)
---
name: contract-review
description: "Analyze commercial agreements against organizational standards with clause-by-clause review"
version: 1.0.0
category: legal
last_updated: 2026-02-03
source: https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
related_skills:
- nda-triage
- compliance
- canned-responses
- legal-risk-assessment
- meeting-briefing
---
# Contract Review Skill Documentation
This resource outlines a systematic methodology for analyzing commercial agreements against organizational standards. The framework emphasizes that such reviews support legal workflows but do not constitute legal counsel.
## Core Methodology
The approach involves identifying contract type and party role, then conducting clause-by-clause analysis. Key areas examined include liability caps, indemnification scope, IP ownership, data protection compliance, termination provisions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
## Severity Classification System
Deviations are categorized as:
- **GREEN (Acceptable)**: Aligns with standard positions; no action needed
- **YELLOW (Negotiate)**: Falls outside preferences but remains negotiable; requires redline suggestions
- **RED (Escalate)**: Poses material risk or triggers escalation criteria; demands senior review
## Redline Best Practices
Effective redlines provide specific language ready for insertion, explain rationales suitable for counterparty sharing, offer fallback positions, and prioritize critical versus aspirational changes. Format includes clause reference, current language, proposed alternatives, rationale, priority level, and backup positions.
## Negotiation Framework
Issues organize into three tiers: Tier 1 (deal-breakers requiring resolution), Tier 2 (strong preferences with negotiation room), and Tier 3 (concession candidates). Strategy involves leading with critical items while trading lower-priority concessions.
The methodology emphasizes balanced, commercially reasonable positions rather than aggressive stances that impede negotiations.
