Dual-perspective code investigation. Claude explores independently, then Codex explores independently (no feeding), finally integrate both conclusions.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill code-investigate --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Code Investigate?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-code-investigate-claude-skill-registry)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: code-investigate
description: Dual-perspective code investigation. Claude explores independently, then Codex explores independently (no feeding), finally integrate both conclusions.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__codex__codex
context: fork
---
# Code Investigate Skill
## Trigger
- Keywords: investigate code, how feature works, trace implementation, dual confirmation, deep dive, how code works, what this code does, code research
## When NOT to Use
- Just need quick lookup (use Grep/Glob directly)
- Code review (use codex-review)
- System verification (use feature-verify)
- Git history tracking (use git-investigate)
## Core Principle
```
Codex must explore independently. Feeding Claude's conclusions to Codex is prohibited.
```
```
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Claude Explores │ │ Codex Explores │
│ Independently │ │ Independently │
│ (Phase 1-2) │ │ (Phase 3) │
└────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ Claude │ │ Codex │
│ Conclusion│ │ Conclusion│
└─────┬─────┘ └─────┬─────┘
│ │
└───────────┬───────────┘
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ Consolidated│
│ Report │
│ (Phase 4) │
└─────────────┘
```
## Workflow
| Phase | Name | Action | Output |
| ----- | --------------- | ----------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| 1 | Claude Explore | Grep/Glob/Read to search code | Related files list |
| 2 | Claude Conclude | Analyze logic, form understanding | Initial conclusion (internal)|
| 3 | Codex Explore | Invoke Codex MCP to explore independently | Codex analysis report |
| 4 | Integrate | Compare both perspectives, mark differences | Consolidated report |
## Codex Invocation Rules
### Required Parameters
| Parameter | Value | Description |
| ----------------- | ----------- | --------------- |
| `sandbox` | `read-only` | Force read-only |
| `approval-policy` | `never` | Auto-execute |
| `cwd` | Project root| Exploration start point |
### Correct Approach
```typescript
mcp__codex__codex({
prompt: `# Code Investigation Task
## Question
${userQuestion}
## Project Info
- Path: ${cwd}
- Tech Stack: {FRAMEWORK} + TypeScript + {DATABASE}
Please **independently explore** the codebase and answer:
1. What files are related?
2. How does the core logic work?
3. What is the data flow?
4. What are the key dependencies?
Please grep/read and explore on your own, then provide your analysis.`,
cwd: '/path/to/project',
sandbox: 'read-only',
'approval-policy': 'never',
});
```
### Prohibited Approaches
| Pattern | Problem | Example |
| ------------------ | --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| Feeding conclusion | Claude's findings leak to Codex | `Claude found these files: ${findings}` |
| Leading question | Presupposes answer | `I think the problem is in cache, verify` |
| Scope restriction | Prevents independent exploration | `Only look at src/service/` |
## Verification Checklist
| Check | Standard |
| ------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| Claude independent conclusion | Phase 2 forms conclusion, not output to user |
| Codex prompt is clean | Contains only question + project path, no Claude findings |
| Report perspectives separated | Claude / Codex conclusions presented separately |
| Integration is complete | Marks agreement, differences, possible gaps |
## References
| File | Purpose | When to Read |
| ------------------------------- | -------------------- | ------------------ |
| `references/prompts.md` | Codex prompt templates | Before Phase 3 |
| `references/output-template.md` | Report format | During Phase 4 |
## Examples
### Feature Investigation
```
Input: Investigate how order processing works
Phase 1: Grep "processOrder" -> Read src/service/order/*.ts
Phase 2: Form understanding: Controller -> Service -> Repository write
Phase 3: Codex explores independently (only given question + path)
Phase 4: Consolidated report -> mark both perspectives
```
### Mechanism Understanding
```
Input: How does the API caching mechanism work?
Phase 1: Grep "cache" + "portfolio" -> Read related files
Phase 2: Understand Redis TTL + fallback mechanism
Phase 3: Codex investigates independently
Phase 4: Compare differences -> output consolidated report
```
### Problem Diagnosis
```
Input: Why is token price sometimes null?
Phase 1: Search price-related logic + error handling
Phase 2: Identify possible fallback paths
Phase 3: Codex diagnoses independently
Phase 4: Synthesize both findings -> list possible causes
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!