Skip to content
Back to skills

Cleanup Health Inline

ASecurity

Inline orchestration workflow for dead code detection and removal. Provides step-by-step phases for dead-code-hunter detection, priority-based cleanup with dead-code-remover, and verification cycles.

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
documentationgobash

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 10, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cleanup-health-inline --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cleanup Health Inline?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cleanup Health Inline
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-cleanup-health-inline/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-cleanup-health-inline)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: cleanup-health-inline
description: Inline orchestration workflow for dead code detection and removal. Provides step-by-step phases for dead-code-hunter detection, priority-based cleanup with dead-code-remover, and verification cycles.
version: 2.0.0
---

# Cleanup Health Check (Inline Orchestration)

You ARE the orchestrator. Execute this workflow directly without spawning a separate orchestrator agent.

## Workflow Overview

```
Detection → Validate → Remove by Priority → Verify → Repeat if needed
```

**Max iterations**: 3
**Priorities**: critical → high → medium → low

---

## Phase 1: Pre-flight

1. **Setup directories**:

   ```bash
   mkdir -p .tmp/current/{plans,changes,backups}
   ```

2. **Validate environment**:
   - Check `package.json` exists
   - Check `type-check` and `build` scripts exist

3. **Initialize TodoWrite**:
   ```json
   [
     {
       "content": "Dead code detection",
       "status": "in_progress",
       "activeForm": "Detecting dead code"
     },
     {
       "content": "Remove critical dead code",
       "status": "pending",
       "activeForm": "Removing critical dead code"
     },
     {
       "content": "Remove high priority dead code",
       "status": "pending",
       "activeForm": "Removing high dead code"
     },
     {
       "content": "Remove medium priority dead code",
       "status": "pending",
       "activeForm": "Removing medium dead code"
     },
     {
       "content": "Remove low priority dead code",
       "status": "pending",
       "activeForm": "Removing low dead code"
     },
     { "content": "Verification scan", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Verifying cleanup" }
   ]
   ```

---

## Phase 2: Detection

**Invoke dead-code-hunter** via Task tool:

```
subagent_type: "dead-code-hunter"
description: "Detect all dead code"
prompt: |
  Scan the entire codebase for dead code:
  - Unused imports and exports
  - Commented out code blocks
  - Unreachable code
  - Debug statements (console.log, debugger)
  - Unused variables and functions
  - Unused dependencies
  - Categorize by priority (critical/high/medium/low)

  Generate: dead-code-report.md

  Return summary with dead code counts per priority.
```

**After dead-code-hunter returns**:

1. Read `dead-code-report.md`
2. Parse dead code counts by priority
3. If zero dead code → skip to Final Summary
4. Update TodoWrite: mark detection complete

---

## Phase 3: Quality Gate (Detection)

Run inline validation:

```bash
pnpm type-check
pnpm build
```

- If both pass → proceed to removal
- If fail → report to user, exit

---

## Phase 4: Removal Loop

**For each priority** (critical → high → medium → low):

1. **Check if dead code exists** for this priority
   - If zero → skip to next priority

2. **Update TodoWrite**: mark current priority in_progress

3. **Invoke dead-code-remover** via Task tool:

   ```
   subagent_type: "dead-code-remover"
   description: "Remove {priority} dead code"
   prompt: |
     Read dead-code-report.md and remove all {priority} priority dead code.

     For each item:
     1. Backup file before editing
     2. Remove dead code
     3. Log change to .tmp/current/changes/cleanup-changes.json

     Generate/update: dead-code-cleanup-summary.md

     Return: count of removed items, count of failed removals.
   ```

4. **Quality Gate** (inline):

   ```bash
   pnpm type-check
   pnpm build
   ```

   - If FAIL → report error, suggest rollback, exit
   - If PASS → continue

5. **Update TodoWrite**: mark priority complete

6. **Repeat** for next priority

---

## Phase 5: Verification

After all priorities cleaned:

1. **Update TodoWrite**: mark verification in_progress

2. **Invoke dead-code-hunter** (verification mode):

   ```
   subagent_type: "dead-code-hunter"
   description: "Verification scan"
   prompt: |
     Re-scan codebase after cleanup.
     Compare with previous dead-code-report.md.

     Report:
     - Dead code removed (count)
     - Dead code remaining (count)
     - New dead code introduced (count)
   ```

3. **Decision**:
   - If dead_code_remaining == 0 → Final Summary
   - If iteration < 3 AND dead_code_remaining > 0 → Go to Phase 2
   - If iteration >= 3 → Final Summary with remaining items

---

## Phase 6: Final Summary

Generate summary for user:

```markdown
## Cleanup Health Check Complete

**Iterations**: {count}/3
**Status**: {SUCCESS/PARTIAL}

### Results

- Found: {total} dead code items
- Removed: {removed} ({percentage}%)
- Remaining: {remaining}

### By Priority

- Critical: {removed}/{total}
- High: {removed}/{total}
- Medium: {removed}/{total}
- Low: {removed}/{total}

### Validation

- Type Check: {status}
- Build: {status}

### Artifacts

- Detection: `dead-code-report.md`
- Cleanup: `dead-code-cleanup-summary.md`
```

---

## Error Handling

**If quality gate fails**:

```
Rollback available: .tmp/current/changes/cleanup-changes.json

To rollback:
1. Read changes log
2. Restore files from .tmp/current/backups/
3. Re-run workflow
```

**If worker fails**:

- Report error to user
- Suggest manual intervention
- Exit workflow

---

## Key Differences from Old Approach

| Old (Orchestrator Agent)  | New (Inline Skill)     |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| 9+ orchestrator calls     | 0 orchestrator calls   |
| ~1400 lines (cmd + agent) | ~150 lines             |
| Context reload each call  | Single session context |
| Plan files for each phase | Direct execution       |
| ~10,000+ tokens overhead  | ~500 tokens            |

---

## Worker Prompts

See `references/worker-prompts.md` for detailed prompts.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.