Skip to content
Back to skills

Clean Architecture Rules

ASecurity

Enforces Clean Architecture dependency rules (Domain → Application → Infrastructure → API/Blazor). Blocks violations to maintain architectural integrity.

  • 666 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added February 8, 2026
devopsc#testingapidatabase

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 10, 2026

npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill clean-architecture-rules --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Clean Architecture Rules?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Clean Architecture Rules
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/majiayu000-clean-architecture-rules/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-clean-architecture-rules)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: clean-architecture-rules
description: Enforces Clean Architecture dependency rules (Domain → Application → Infrastructure → API/Blazor). Blocks violations to maintain architectural integrity.
type: guardrail
enforcement: block
priority: critical
---

# Clean Architecture Dependency Rules

> **Project-Agnostic Clean Architecture Guidelines**
>
> Placeholders use `{Placeholder}` syntax - see [docs/TEMPLATE_GLOSSARY.md](../../../docs/TEMPLATE_GLOSSARY.md).

## Purpose

This is a **CRITICAL GUARDRAIL** that enforces Clean Architecture's fundamental dependency rule: **dependencies flow inward only**. Violations are **BLOCKED** to prevent architectural degradation.

## When This Skill Activates

**Automatically BLOCKS when**:
- Attempting to add wrong project references
- Importing namespaces that violate dependency rules
- Detecting prohibited `using` statements in Domain or Application layers

**Triggered by**:
- Keywords: "dependency", "reference", "architecture", "layer", "add project"
- File patterns: Domain/**/*.cs, Application/**/*.cs
- Content patterns: `using {Project}.Infrastructure`, `using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore` in Domain

## The Dependency Rule

```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CLEAN ARCHITECTURE LAYERS                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │              1. DOMAIN (Core)                       │   │
│  │              {Project}.Domain                       │   │
│  │              ↑ NO DEPENDENCIES                      │   │
│  │  • Entities, Enums, Value Objects, Domain Events    │   │
│  │  • Pure C# - No framework dependencies             │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                         ▲                                   │
│                         │ References                        │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │         2. APPLICATION (Use Cases)                  │   │
│  │         {Project}.Application                       │   │
│  │         ↑ References: Domain ONLY                   │   │
│  │  • CQRS Commands/Queries, DTOs, Interfaces          │   │
│  │  • MediatR, FluentValidation, AutoMapper            │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                         ▲                                   │
│                         │ References                        │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │    3. INFRASTRUCTURE (Implementation)               │   │
│  │    {Project}.Persistence + {Project}.Infrastructure │   │
│  │    ↑ References: Application, Domain                │   │
│  │  • DbContext, Repositories, External APIs           │   │
│  │  • EF Core, Database Provider, Email, File Storage  │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                         ▲                                   │
│                         │ References                        │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │       4. PRESENTATION (Entry Points)                │   │
│  │       {Project}.API + {Project}.Blazor              │   │
│  │       ↑ References: ALL (Composition Root)          │   │
│  │  • Controllers, Pages, Dependency Registration      │   │
│  │  • ASP.NET Core, Blazor, SignalR                    │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

## Resources

| Resource | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| [dependency-rules.md](resources/dependency-rules.md) | Complete dependency matrix and flow diagram |
| [layer-responsibilities.md](resources/layer-responsibilities.md) | What code belongs in each layer |
| [violation-examples.md](resources/violation-examples.md) | Common violations and error messages |
| [fix-patterns.md](resources/fix-patterns.md) | How to fix violations using interfaces and DI |

## Valid Dependency Examples

```csharp
// ✅ VALID: Application references Domain
namespace {Project}.Application.Features.{Entities}.Commands;

using {Project}.Domain.Entities;  // ✅ OK - App can reference Domain
using {Project}.Domain.Enums;     // ✅ OK
using MediatR;                    // ✅ OK - Framework dependency

// ✅ VALID: Infrastructure references Application and Domain
namespace {Project}.Persistence.Repositories;

using {Project}.Application.Interfaces;  // ✅ OK - Implements interfaces
using {Project}.Domain.Entities;         // ✅ OK - Works with entities
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;     // ✅ OK - Infrastructure can use EF Core

// ✅ VALID: API references all layers
namespace {Project}.API.Controllers;

using {Project}.Application.Features.{Entities}.Commands;  // ✅ OK
using {Project}.Infrastructure.Services;                   // ✅ OK
using MediatR;                                             // ✅ OK
```

## BLOCKED Violations

```csharp
// ❌ BLOCKED: Domain referencing ANYTHING
namespace {Project}.Domain.Entities;

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;    // ❌ BLOCKED! Domain must be pure
using {Project}.Application.DTOs;       // ❌ BLOCKED! Dependency flows wrong way

// ❌ BLOCKED: Application referencing Infrastructure
namespace {Project}.Application.Features.{Entities}.Queries;

using {Project}.Infrastructure.Persistence;  // ❌ BLOCKED! Use interfaces instead
using {Project}.API.Controllers;             // ❌ BLOCKED! Wrong direction

// ❌ BLOCKED: Application referencing Presentation
namespace {Project}.Application.Commands;

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;  // ❌ BLOCKED! Application must be framework-agnostic
```

## Quick Fix: Use Dependency Inversion

**Problem**: Application needs database access (Infrastructure)

**❌ Wrong - Direct dependency**:
```csharp
// In {Project}.Application
using {Project}.Infrastructure.Persistence;  // ❌ BLOCKED

public class Get{Entities}Handler
{
    private readonly {DbContext} _context;  // ❌ Concrete class
}
```

**✅ Correct - Interface in Application, Implementation in Infrastructure**:
```csharp
// Step 1: Define interface in Application layer
// File: {Project}.Application/Contracts/Persistence/I{Entity}Repository.cs
namespace {Project}.Application.Contracts.Persistence;

public interface I{Entity}Repository
{
    Task<List<{Entity}>> GetAllAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken);
}

// Step 2: Use interface in Application
// File: {Project}.Application/Features/{Entities}/Handlers/Queries/Get{Entity}ListRequestHandler.cs
namespace {Project}.Application.Features.{Entities}.Handlers.Queries;

using {Project}.Application.Contracts.Persistence;  // ✅ OK - Same layer

public class Get{Entity}ListRequestHandler : IRequestHandler<Get{Entity}ListRequest, List<{Entity}ListDto>>
{
    private readonly I{Entity}Repository _repository;  // ✅ Abstraction

    public Get{Entity}ListRequestHandler(I{Entity}Repository repository)
    {
        _repository = repository;
    }

    public async Task<List<{Entity}ListDto>> Handle(Get{Entity}ListRequest request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        var {entities} = await _repository.GetAllAsync(cancellationToken);
        return {entities}.Select(e => e.ToDto()).ToList();
    }
}

// Step 3: Implement in Infrastructure layer
// File: {Project}.Persistence/Repositories/{Entity}Repository.cs
namespace {Project}.Persistence.Repositories;

using {Project}.Application.Contracts.Persistence;  // ✅ OK - Implements interface
using {Project}.Domain.Entities;                    // ✅ OK - Works with entities
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;                // ✅ OK - Infrastructure can use EF Core

public class {Entity}Repository : I{Entity}Repository
{
    private readonly {DbContext} _context;

    public async Task<List<{Entity}>> GetAllAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        return await _context.{Entities}.ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
    }
}

// Step 4: Register in API/Blazor (Composition Root)
// File: {Project}.API/Program.cs
builder.Services.AddScoped<I{Entity}Repository, {Entity}Repository>();  // ✅ DI binding
```

## Why This Matters

**Benefits of Clean Architecture**:
1. **Testability**: Domain and Application can be tested without database
2. **Flexibility**: Swap database providers without changing business logic
3. **Maintainability**: Business logic isolated from framework changes
4. **Team Scalability**: Clear boundaries for parallel development
5. **Deployment Options**: Domain can be reused across API, Blazor, CLI, etc.

**Cost of Violations**:
- Tight coupling makes testing difficult
- Framework upgrades break business logic
- Cannot reuse domain logic across projects
- Circular dependencies cause build failures

## CRITICAL: Validator Manual Instantiation Pattern

### Rule: Validators Must Be Instantiated Manually, NOT DI Injected

**BLOCKED Violation**: Validators injected via DI in handler constructor

```csharp
// ❌ BLOCKED: DI injection of validators
public class Create{Entity}CommandHandler : IRequestHandler<Create{Entity}Command, BaseCommandResponse<{IdType}>>
{
    private readonly IValidator<Create{Entity}Dto> _validator;  // ❌ BLOCKED!

    public Create{Entity}CommandHandler(
        I{Entity}Repository {entity}Repository,
        IMapper mapper,
        IValidator<Create{Entity}Dto> validator)  // ❌ BLOCKED - DI injection
    {
        _validator = validator;  // ❌ BLOCKED
    }

    public async Task<BaseCommandResponse<{IdType}>> Handle(...)
    {
        var validationResult = await _validator.ValidateAsync(request.{Entity}Dto);  // ❌ BLOCKED
        ...
    }
}
```

**✅ Correct Pattern**: Validator instantiated with dependencies passed to constructor

```csharp
// ✅ CORRECT: Manual instantiation with dependencies
namespace {Project}.Application.Features.{Entities}.Handlers.Commands;

using System.Linq;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using AutoMapper;
using {Project}.Application.Contracts.Persistence;
using {Project}.Application.DTOs.{Entity}.Validators;
using {Project}.Application.Features.{Entities}.Requests.Commands;
using {Project}.Application.Responses;
using {Project}.Domain;
using MediatR;

public class Create{Entity}CommandHandler : IRequestHandler<Create{Entity}Command, BaseCommandResponse<{IdType}>>
{
    private readonly I{Entity}Repository _{entity}Repository;
    private readonly I{RelatedEntity1}Repository _{relatedEntity1}Repository;
    private readonly I{RelatedEntity2}Repository _{relatedEntity2}Repository;
    private readonly IMapper _mapper;

    public Create{Entity}CommandHandler(
        I{Entity}Repository {entity}Repository,
        I{RelatedEntity1}Repository {relatedEntity1}Repository,
        I{RelatedEntity2}Repository {relatedEntity2}Repository,
        IMapper mapper)
    {
        _{entity}Repository = {entity}Repository;
        _{relatedEntity1}Repository = {relatedEntity1}Repository;
        _{relatedEntity2}Repository = {relatedEntity2}Repository;
        _mapper = mapper;
    }

    public async Task<BaseCommandResponse<{IdType}>> Handle(Create{Entity}Command request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        var response = new BaseCommandResponse<{IdType}>();

        // ✅ CORRECT: Validator instantiated manually with all dependencies
        var validator = new Create{Entity}DtoValidator(
            _{relatedEntity1}Repository,
            _{relatedEntity2}Repository);

        var validationResult = await validator.ValidateAsync(request.{Entity}Dto, cancellationToken);

        if (!validationResult.IsValid)
        {
            response.Success = false;
            response.Message = "{Entity} creation failed.";
            response.Errors = validationResult.Errors.Select(e => e.ErrorMessage).ToList();
            return response;
        }

        // Map DTO to Entity
        var {entity} = _mapper.Map<{Entity}>(request.{Entity}Dto);

        // Save through repository
        {entity} = await _{entity}Repository.Create({entity});

        response.Success = true;
        response.Id = {entity}.Id;
        response.Message = "{Entity} created successfully.";

        return response;
    }
}
```

### Why Manual Instantiation?

1. **Fine-grained dependency control**: Each validator receives specific repositories it needs
2. **Prevents DI configuration issues**: No need to register validators in DI container
3. **Simplifies testing**: Easy to create test validators with mocked repositories
4. **Follows established pattern**: Consistent across all entity implementations

### Validator Constructor Pattern

Validators MUST accept repositories in constructor for FK validation.

```csharp
namespace {Project}.Application.DTOs.{Entity}.Validators;

using FluentValidation;
using {Project}.Application.Contracts.Persistence;

public class Create{Entity}DtoValidator : AbstractValidator<Create{Entity}Dto>
{
    private readonly I{RelatedEntity1}Repository _{relatedEntity1}Repository;
    private readonly I{RelatedEntity2}Repository _{relatedEntity2}Repository;

    public Create{Entity}DtoValidator(
        I{RelatedEntity1}Repository {relatedEntity1}Repository,
        I{RelatedEntity2}Repository {relatedEntity2}Repository)
    {
        _{relatedEntity1}Repository = {relatedEntity1}Repository;
        _{relatedEntity2}Repository = {relatedEntity2}Repository;

        // Standard validation rules
        RuleFor(x => x.Title)
            .NotEmpty().WithMessage("Title is required")
            .MaximumLength(200);

        RuleFor(x => x.Description)
            .MaximumLength(5000)
            .When(x => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(x.Description));

        // Foreign key validation with repository
        RuleFor(x => x.{RelatedEntity1}Id)
            .NotEmpty().WithMessage("{RelatedEntity1} is required")
            .MustAsync(async (id, cancellation) =>
            {
                var exists = await _{relatedEntity1}Repository.Exists(id);
                return exists;
            })
            .WithMessage("{RelatedEntity1} not found");

        RuleFor(x => x.{RelatedEntity2}Id)
            .MustAsync(async (id, cancellation) =>
            {
                if (!id.HasValue) return true;
                return await _{relatedEntity2}Repository.Exists(id.Value);
            })
            .When(x => x.{RelatedEntity2}Id.HasValue)
            .WithMessage("{RelatedEntity2} not found");
    }
}
```

---

## Deep Dive

For comprehensive guidance:
- **Dependency Matrix**: [dependency-rules.md](resources/dependency-rules.md)
- **Layer Responsibilities**: [layer-responsibilities.md](resources/layer-responsibilities.md)
- **Common Violations**: [violation-examples.md](resources/violation-examples.md)
- **Fix Patterns**: [fix-patterns.md](resources/fix-patterns.md)

---

**Enforcement Level**: BLOCK (Violations are prevented)
**Override**: Add `@skip-architecture-check` comment in file (use sparingly)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.