Back to skills
SKILL.md
Canonical Spec Format
ASecurityCanonical specification format reference. Use when understanding the canonical spec schema, field requirements, provider-agnostic specification structure, or validating specifications against the schema.
- 666 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added February 8, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill canonical-spec-format --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Canonical Spec Format?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majiayu000-canonical-spec-format)---
name: canonical-spec-format
description: Canonical specification format reference. Use when understanding the canonical spec schema, field requirements, provider-agnostic specification structure, or validating specifications against the schema.
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
---
# Canonical Specification Format
Reference guide for the canonical specification format - the provider-agnostic intermediate representation defined in ADR-115.
## When to Use This Skill
**Keywords:** canonical specification, canonical spec, spec schema, specification format, provider-agnostic, spec fields, spec validation, spec structure, YAML specification, JSON schema
**Use this skill when:**
- Understanding canonical specification structure
- Validating specifications against schema
- Creating specifications manually
- Mapping between providers and canonical format
- Debugging specification transformation issues
## Quick Reference
### Minimal Valid Specification
```yaml
id: "SPEC-001"
title: "Feature Title"
type: feature
context:
problem: "Problem description (min 20 chars)"
motivation: "Business value"
requirements:
- id: "REQ-001"
text: "The system SHALL do something"
priority: must
ears_type: ubiquitous
acceptance_criteria:
- id: "AC-001"
given: "precondition"
when: "action"
then: "outcome"
metadata:
status: draft
created: "2025-12-24"
provider: canonical
```
### Required Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `id` | string | Format: SPEC-{number} |
| `title` | string | Human-readable title |
| `type` | enum | feature, bug, chore, spike, tech-debt |
| `context.problem` | string | Min 20 characters |
| `context.motivation` | string | Business value |
| `requirements` | array | At least one requirement |
| `metadata.status` | enum | draft, review, approved, implemented, deprecated |
| `metadata.created` | string | ISO 8601 date |
| `metadata.provider` | string | Provider that created this spec |
## Field Reference
### Root Level
```yaml
id: "SPEC-001" # Required: Unique identifier
title: "Feature Title" # Required: Human-readable name
type: feature # Required: Specification type
```
**Type Values:**
| Type | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `feature` | New functionality or capability |
| `bug` | Defect fix |
| `chore` | Maintenance task |
| `spike` | Research or investigation |
| `tech-debt` | Technical debt reduction |
### Context Section
```yaml
context:
problem: | # Required: min 20 chars
Clear description of the problem.
What pain point does this address?
motivation: | # Required
Business value or user benefit.
Why should we invest in this?
background: | # Optional
Additional context, history, constraints
```
### Requirements Section
```yaml
requirements:
- id: "REQ-001" # Required: Unique within spec
text: "EARS requirement" # Required: EARS-formatted
priority: must # Required: must/should/could/wont
ears_type: event-driven # Required: EARS pattern type
acceptance_criteria: # Required: at least one
- id: "AC-001"
given: "precondition"
when: "action"
then: "outcome"
and: # Optional: additional conditions
- "additional condition"
notes: "Optional notes" # Optional
```
**Priority Values (MoSCoW):**
| Priority | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `must` | Non-negotiable, system fails without it |
| `should` | Important but not critical |
| `could` | Desirable if resources permit |
| `wont` | Explicitly excluded from scope |
**EARS Type Values:**
| Type | Pattern | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `ubiquitous` | The system SHALL... | "The system SHALL encrypt data" |
| `state-driven` | WHILE..., the system SHALL... | "WHILE active, the system SHALL..." |
| `event-driven` | WHEN..., the system SHALL... | "WHEN clicked, the system SHALL..." |
| `unwanted` | IF..., THEN the system SHALL... | "IF error, THEN the system SHALL..." |
| `complex` | Combinations | "WHILE active, WHEN clicked..." |
| `optional` | WHERE..., the system SHALL... | "WHERE enabled, the system SHALL..." |
### Design Section (Optional)
```yaml
design:
approach: | # Optional: implementation approach
High-level description of how to implement
components: # Optional: affected components
- "Component 1"
- "Component 2"
dependencies: # Optional: prerequisites
- "External dependency"
alternatives: # Optional: considered alternatives
- name: "Alternative approach"
reason_rejected: "Why not chosen"
```
### Traceability Section (Optional)
```yaml
traceability:
adr_refs: # Optional: related ADRs
- "ADR-115"
requirement_refs: # Optional: related requirements
- "FR-001"
- "NFR-001"
epic_ref: "EPIC-1118" # Optional: parent EPIC
user_story_refs: # Optional: related user stories
- "US-001"
```
### Metadata Section
```yaml
metadata:
status: draft # Required
created: "2025-12-24" # Required: ISO 8601
provider: canonical # Required
version: "1.0.0" # Optional: semantic version
bounded_context: "WorkManagement" # Optional: from ADR-024
```
**Status Values:**
| Status | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `draft` | Initial creation, not reviewed |
| `review` | Under review/refinement |
| `approved` | Approved for implementation |
| `implemented` | Implementation complete |
| `deprecated` | No longer valid |
**Bounded Context Values (ADR-024):**
- WorkManagement
- Orchestration
- Workflows
- Expertise
- ExecutionControl
- TriggerManagement
- Integrations
## Validation Rules
### ID Formats
| Field | Format | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Specification ID | SPEC-{number} | SPEC-042 |
| Requirement ID | REQ-{number} | REQ-001 |
| Acceptance Criterion ID | AC-{number} | AC-001 |
| ADR Reference | ADR-{number} | ADR-115 |
| EPIC Reference | EPIC-{number} | EPIC-1118 |
| User Story Reference | US-{number} | US-001 |
### Content Constraints
| Field | Constraint |
| --- | --- |
| `context.problem` | Minimum 20 characters |
| `requirements` | At least one requirement |
| `acceptance_criteria` | At least one criterion per requirement |
| `metadata.created` | Valid ISO 8601 date |
### EARS Pattern Validation
Each requirement's `text` field must match its declared `ears_type`:
| ears_type | Required Pattern |
| --- | --- |
| `ubiquitous` | Starts with "The" + entity + "SHALL" |
| `state-driven` | Starts with "WHILE" |
| `event-driven` | Starts with "WHEN" |
| `unwanted` | Contains "IF" and "THEN" |
| `optional` | Starts with "WHERE" |
| `complex` | Multiple pattern keywords |
## JSON Schema Location
```text
schemas/canonical-spec.schema.json
```
## Provider Transformation
The canonical format serves as the hub for all provider transformations:
```text
┌─────────────┐
│ Canonical │
│ Spec │
└──────┬──────┘
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
│ │ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
│EARS │ │Ghrkn│ │Kiro │ │SpKit│ │ ADR │
└─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘
```
All providers implement `ISpecificationProvider`:
```csharp
interface ISpecificationProvider
{
string ProviderName { get; }
Task<Result<CanonicalSpec>> ParseAsync(string input);
Task<Result<string>> GenerateAsync(CanonicalSpec spec);
Task<ValidationResult> ValidateAsync(CanonicalSpec spec);
bool CanParse(string input);
}
```
## References
**Detailed Documentation:**
- [Schema Reference](references/schema-reference.md)
- [Validation Rules](references/validation-rules.md)
**Repository Resources:**
- `schemas/canonical-spec.schema.json` - JSON Schema
- `docs/adr/ADR-115-specification-provider-abstraction.md` - Architecture decision
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-26
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…