Skip to content
Back to skills

MizuRoute

ASecurity

**Package**: `hydrocraft-mizuroute` v1.0.0 **Model**: mizuRoute (NCAR/ESCOMP), reach-based river routing **Repository**: https://github.com/ESCOMP/mizuRoute **Created by**: Jianyun Zhang Research Group, Hohai University **Last updated**: 2026-03-22 **Stats**: current tool, stage-doc and triplet counts: the KI map at the top of this file **Validation status**: `production_validated` — 3 serial stub bugs fixed ---

  • 231 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongobashnodedebugginggitperformancedocumentation

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 20 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 9, 2026

npx -y skills add lzwei196/KISS---Knowledge-Infrastructure-for-Scientific-Simulation --skill mizuRoute --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of MizuRoute?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for MizuRoute
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lzwei196-mizuroute/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lzwei196-mizuroute)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
> **MANDATORY EXECUTION POLICY** — READ BEFORE PROCEEDING
>
> You MUST run the **actual model binary or package** described in this document.
> If the model fails to import, compile, or execute, you MUST:
> 1. Check `diagnostics/triplets.yaml` for a matching error pattern
> 2. Try the fix suggested in the triplet's `remedy` section
> 3. If still failing, report the error to the user with full details
>
> You MUST NOT substitute a simplified Python formula, regression equation,
> or hand-coded approximation in place of the real model. Doing so produces
> scientifically invalid results and defeats the purpose of the KI.
>
> Before starting, run: `python preflight_check.py` (in this KI directory)

> **CMFD direct reader available:** Use `from ki_tools_common.netcdf_utils import load_cmfd_daily_all` to read CMFD 3-hourly data directly. Returns daily precip (mm), temp (°C with Tmin/Tmax), radiation (W/m²), wind, humidity. Handles subdirectory search (Prec/, Temp/, etc.) and unit conversions automatically.
> to verify that the model binary/package and required data are available.
>
> **DEBUGGING PROTOCOL** — When something goes wrong, follow this order:
> 1. **Check triplets** — `diagnostics/triplets.yaml` may already cover this error
> 2. **Read official docs** — The model's own documentation for expected formats/units
> 3. **Find working examples** — Check `outputs/` or the model's shipped test data
> 4. **Fix the tool** — With knowledge of what "correct" looks like
>
> Do NOT write custom debug scripts. The answers are in the docs and examples.

<!-- KI-MAP:BEGIN (projected by generate_skill_map.py — edit the KI, not this table) -->
## KI map — what to read, and when

| when you need | read | why |
|---|---|---|
| FIRST, always | `preflight_check.py` | run it (`python preflight_check.py`): proves env/binary/data are usable and emits a machine-readable `PREFLIGHT_REPORT=` line. Do not debug a run that never had a healthy environment. |
| to run the pipeline stages | `tools/` (7 tools) | the executable pipeline. Read each tool's argparse (`--help`) before composing a command; SKILL.md's stage table says which tool serves which stage. |
| before running a stage | `docs/s*_*.md` (7 stage docs) | per-stage procedure, verification and traps — the how-to that SKILL.md's overview compresses. |
| on ANY error, before debugging | `diagnostics/triplets.yaml` (19 entries) | symptom → diagnosis → remedy for this model's known failure modes. Check here FIRST; the answer usually exists. Never renumber or rewrite entries. |
| to know what an output IS | `dag.yaml` | the model's identity: every output's medium, units, `validation_rank` (1 = the headline variable) and observability. Scoring and obs-binding read THIS — when asked 'what does this model predict', the dag is the answer, not a guess. |
| when building inputs / parsing outputs | `docs/format_spec.yaml` | exact I/O shapes + `known_issues`, projected from dag + triplets. Regenerate with `ki_tools_common/generate_format_spec.py` after changing either — never hand-edit. |
| to judge a run's skill | `docs/validation_convention.yaml` | how this model's field judges it validated: per-`dag_variable` metrics, directions and CITED pass-bands. A run is graded against these, not against intuition. |
| for claims and thresholds | `docs/gathered_papers.json` (14 papers) + `docs/papers_index.md` | the literature this KI is judged by; each entry's `text_path` is fetched full text in the central paper cache. `role: benchmark` marks the model's own skill paper. |
| for a machine-readable summary | `knowledge_infrastructure.yaml` | the manifest (package, pipeline, validation tier, counts) — projected by `ki_tools_common/generate_ki_manifest.py`; regenerate after structural changes, never hand-edit. |

*Projected 2026-08-17 from the KI's actual contents — 9 components present. Refresh: `python3 ki_tools_common/generate_skill_map.py --ki_dir <this KI>`.*
<!-- KI-MAP:END -->

<!-- KI-TOOL-INDEX:BEGIN (projected by generate_skill_map.py — the discoverability contract: every public tool, exact path; PURPOSE stays human-authored elsewhere) -->
### Executable tool index (projected — complete by construction)

Every public tool in this KI, by exact path. What each is FOR lives in the
human-written Tool Inventory above; `--help` on any of these prints its arguments.

| tool (exact path) | invocation |
|---|---|
| `tools/s1_network/build_network_topology.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s1_network/build_network_topology.py --help` |
| `tools/s2_remap/create_remap_weights.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s2_remap/create_remap_weights.py --help` |
| `tools/s3_runoff/convert_vic_runoff.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s3_runoff/convert_vic_runoff.py --help` |
| `tools/s4_control/generate_control_file.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s4_control/generate_control_file.py --help` |
| `tools/s5_execution/run_mizuroute.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s5_execution/run_mizuroute.py --help` |
| `tools/s6_postprocess/compare_routing_methods.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s6_postprocess/compare_routing_methods.py --help` |
| `tools/s6_postprocess/extract_discharge.py` | `KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/python {KI}/tools/s6_postprocess/extract_discharge.py --help` |

*7 public tools; `_`-prefixed helpers and packaging files excluded.*
<!-- KI-TOOL-INDEX:END -->

---

## Data Preparation

### Input data

**Input Source**: mizuRoute takes gridded runoff from upstream hydrological models (VIC, mHM, etc.).
- `convert_vic_runoff.py` — Converts VIC runoff output to mizuRoute input NetCDF format
- `build_network_topology.py` — Builds river network topology from DEM/NHD
- `create_remap_weights.py` — Creates spatial remapping weights for grid-to-reach mapping

**Data Validation Reference**: See `data_ki/ObservedQ/SKILL.md` for observed discharge validation data.

---

# mizuRoute — Knowledge Infrastructure

**Package**: `hydrocraft-mizuroute` v1.0.0
**Model**: mizuRoute (NCAR/ESCOMP), reach-based river routing
**Repository**: https://github.com/ESCOMP/mizuRoute
**Created by**: Jianyun Zhang Research Group, Hohai University
**Last updated**: 2026-03-22
**Stats**: current tool, stage-doc and triplet counts: the KI map at the top of this file
**Validation status**: `production_validated` — 3 serial stub bugs fixed

---

## Overview

This knowledge infrastructure enables reach-based river routing using mizuRoute on any basin in HydroCraft, taking VIC or WRF-Hydro gridded runoff output and routing it through an explicit vector river network. mizuRoute is the **only** routing model in HydroCraft that offers 5 selectable routing methods and lake/reservoir routing.

**What mizuRoute does**: Takes gridded runoff from a land surface model and routes it through a user-defined catchment-based (vector) river network to compute streamflow at every reach.

**Key differentiator**: Unlike grid-based routing (Lohmann, CaMa-Flood), mizuRoute operates on an explicit river network where each reach has physical properties (length, slope, width). This enables:
- 5 routing methods with different physics (from simple IRF to full diffusive wave)
- Lake/reservoir routing (level-pool, Hanasaki, rule curves)
- MPI parallelism for continental-scale networks
- Method intercomparison on the same basin (unique in HydroCraft)

### The 5 Routing Methods

| ID | Method | Physics | Best for | Cost |
|----|--------|---------|----------|------|
| 0 | **IRF** | Unit hydrograph per reach | Quick runs, large networks | Lowest |
| 1 | **KWT** | Lagrangian wave tracking | Flood wave propagation | Low |
| 2 | **KWE** | Euler kinematic wave | General purpose | Moderate |
| 3 | **MC** | Muskingum-Cunge | Operational forecasting (NWM-style) | Moderate |
| 4 | **DW** | Diffusive wave | Flat terrain, backwater effects | Highest |

### When to Use mizuRoute vs Lohmann vs CaMa-Flood

| Feature | Lohmann | CaMa-Flood | mizuRoute |
|---------|---------|------------|-----------|
| Grid type | Regular lat/lon | Regular 15min | Vector river network |
| Physics | Unit hydrograph (1 method) | Local inertia + floodplain | 5 selectable methods |
| Floodplain | No | **Yes** (key strength) | No |
| Lake/reservoir | No | Limited | **Yes** (3 schemes) |
| Setup complexity | Low | Medium | Medium |
| Best for | Default, simple routing | Flood inundation mapping | Method comparison, lakes, reach-scale analysis |

---

## Installation

### Binary

```
mizuRoute:   model/mizuRoute/mizuRoute-main/route/bin/mizuroute.exe
Source:      model/mizuRoute/mizuRoute-main/route/build/src/ (Fortran 90)
Platform:    Ubuntu 24.04, x86-64, gfortran 13 + NetCDF-Fortran
Build:       Serial (MPI/PIO stub modules)
```

### Building from Source

mizuRoute requires MPI and PIO (Parallel I/O) libraries. Two approaches:

**Approach A (recommended): Install MPI, then build with real libraries**
```bash
# Install MPI (requires sudo)
sudo apt-get install -y libopenmpi-dev openmpi-bin cmake

# Build PIO and mizuRoute
cd model/mizuRoute/mizuRoute-main/route/build
# Edit Makefile: set FC=gnu, FC_EXE=mpifort, F_MASTER=..., NCDF_PATH=/usr
make
```

**Approach B: Serial build with stub modules (no MPI/PIO needed)**
```bash
cd model/mizuRoute/mizuRoute-main/route/build
bash ../../build_serial.sh
```

Serial stubs are at `serial_stubs/` providing MPI constants, PIO types/constants, and GPTL timing no-ops. The PIO stub needs further expansion for complete compilation (pio_inq_varid and additional pio_put_var/pio_read_darray overloads). See `diagnostics/error_log.yaml` for details on stub development.

**Dependencies** (all on server except MPI):
- gfortran >= 7.0 (installed: 13.3.0)
- libnetcdff (installed: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetcdff.so)
- libnetcdf (installed)
- libopenmpi-dev (NOT installed, needed for Approach A)

### Python dependencies (all in HydroCraft venv)

```
netCDF4, numpy, geopandas, shapely, rasterio, scipy, whitebox (WhiteboxTools)
```

---

## Pipeline (7 stages)

| # | Stage | Tool(s) | Description |
|---|-------|---------|-------------|
| 0 | Configuration | (manual) | Basin, time period, routing method, upstream model |
| 1 | Network topology | `build_network_topology` | DEM + shapefile -> river network NetCDF |
| 2 | Runoff remapping | `create_remap_weights` | VIC grid -> HRU area-weighted overlap |
| 3 | Runoff conversion | `convert_vic_runoff` | VIC flux files -> mizuRoute NetCDF (mm/s) |
| 4 | Control file | `generate_control_file` | All paths, method, time settings |
| 5 | Execution | `run_mizuroute` | Preflight checks + run + postflight |
| 6 | Output extraction | `extract_discharge`, `compare_routing_methods` | Q timeseries, metrics, method comparison |

### Parallelism

Stages 1 and 3 can run in parallel (independent).
Stage 2 depends on 1 (needs HRU definitions).
Stage 4 depends on 1, 2, 3 (needs all file paths).
Stage 5 depends on 4.
Stage 6 depends on 5.

```
s0 ─────────────────────────────────────┐
  │                                      │
  ├──> s1 (network) ──> s2 (remap) ──┐  │
  │                                   ├──> s4 (control) ──> s5 (run) ──> s6 (output)
  └──> s3 (runoff) ──────────────────┘
```

---

## Tools Reference

| Tool | Stage | Script Path | Lines | Purpose |
|------|-------|-------------|------:|---------|
| `build_network_topology` | s1 | `tools/s1_network/build_network_topology.py` | 492 | DEM -> river network topology NetCDF via WhiteboxTools |
| `create_remap_weights` | s2 | `tools/s2_remap/create_remap_weights.py` | 274 | VIC grid -> HRU area-weighted overlap NetCDF |
| `convert_vic_runoff` | s3 | `tools/s3_runoff/convert_vic_runoff.py` | 385 | VIC flux -> mizuRoute runoff NetCDF (mm/timestep -> mm/s) |
| `generate_control_file` | s4 | `tools/s4_control/generate_control_file.py` | 243 | Generate mizuRoute control file from config |
| `run_mizuroute` | s5 | `tools/s5_execution/run_mizuroute.py` | 258 | Execute mizuRoute with preflight/postflight checks |
| `extract_discharge` | s6 | `tools/s6_postprocess/extract_discharge.py` | 275 | Parse output -> discharge CSV + metrics (NSE, KGE, RMSE) |
| `compare_routing_methods` | s6 | `tools/s6_postprocess/compare_routing_methods.py` | 188 | Run all 5 methods and compare discharge |

**Total**: the current tool count is in the KI map at the top of this file.

### Skill Documents

| Stage | Document | Covers |
|-------|----------|--------|
| s0 | `docs/s0_config_skill.md` | Routing method selection guide, basin size decision tree |
| s1 | `docs/s1_network_skill.md` | Stream network from DEM, threshold selection, topology validation |
| s2 | `docs/s2_remap_skill.md` | Spatial remapping, CRS alignment, weight validation |
| s3 | `docs/s3_runoff_skill.md` | Unit conversion table (mm/timestep -> mm/s), temporal alignment |
| s4 | `docs/s4_control_skill.md` | Complete control file reference, variable name mapping |
| s5 | `docs/s5_execution_skill.md` | Running mizuRoute, interpreting errors, expected runtimes |
| s6 | `docs/s6_comparison_skill.md` | 3-way comparison methodology (Lohmann vs CaMa vs mizuRoute) |
| lake | `docs/s_lake_routing_skill.md` | Lake/reservoir routing setup and parameter estimation |

---

## 6. Output Description

**Source**: `dag.yaml`. This section restates the dag's observable outputs for an agent that is reading only `SKILL.md`. If this section ever disagrees with `dag.yaml`, the dag wins.

**Headline output**: the dag's rank-1 variable, which is the one this model is judged by.

> `routed_discharge` - Streamflow at each river segment for each active routing method (IRFroutedRunoff, KWTroutedRunoff, KWroutedRunoff, MCroutedRunoff, DWroutedRunoff); REACH_Q. (`m3/s`)

| Output variable (dag `var`) | Validation rank | Unit | Output description / extracted dag fact |
|---|---:|---|---|
| `routed_discharge` | 1 | `m3/s` | Streamflow at each river segment for each active routing method (IRFroutedRunoff, KWTroutedRunoff, KWroutedRunoff, MCroutedRunoff, DWroutedRunoff); REACH_Q. |
| `basRunoff` | not stated in extracted facts | not stated in extracted facts | Other dag output. |
| `REACH_VOL` | not stated in extracted facts | not stated in extracted facts | Other dag output. |
| `lake_outflow_storage` | not stated in extracted facts | not stated in extracted facts | Other dag output. |

The full other-output list from the dag facts is: `basRunoff`, `REACH_VOL`, `lake_outflow_storage`.

---

## 8. Unit Conversion Table

This table records the unit conversions and output units that matter for running and evaluating the mizuRoute KI. Exact I/O shapes live in `docs/format_spec.yaml`; the dag remains authoritative for output variables.

### Input Conversions

| Variable | Source unit | Model unit | Factor | Type |
|---|---|---|---:|---|
| VIC daily `RUNOFF` | `mm/day` | `mm/s` | divide by `86400` | rate conversion |
| VIC daily `BASEFLOW` | `mm/day` | `mm/s` | divide by `86400` | rate conversion |
| VIC 3-hourly `RUNOFF` | `mm/3hr` | `mm/s` | divide by `10800` | rate conversion |
| VIC 3-hourly `BASEFLOW` | `mm/3hr` | `mm/s` | divide by `10800` | rate conversion |

### Output Units

| Output variable | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|
| `routed_discharge` | `m3/s` | `dag.yaml` extracted fact |
| `basRunoff` | not stated in extracted facts | `dag.yaml` extracted other-output list |
| `REACH_VOL` | not stated in extracted facts | `dag.yaml` extracted other-output list |
| `lake_outflow_storage` | not stated in extracted facts | `dag.yaml` extracted other-output list |

### Sign Conventions and Output Unit Checks

| Variable | Convention in this model | Common alternative | Impact if wrong |
|---|---|---|---|
| `routed_discharge` | Absolute streamflow in `m3/s` at each river segment for each active routing method. | Runoff depth or timestep accumulation. | Magnitude and validation metrics are invalid. |
| `RUNOFF` / `BASEFLOW` inputs | mizuRoute-ready runoff rate in `mm/s`. | VIC depth per timestep (`mm/day` or `mm/3hr`). | Discharge is scaled by `86400` or `10800`. |
| `basRunoff` | Dag output; unit not stated in extracted facts. | Treating it as a validation discharge target. | Mass-conservation checks can be misread as outlet-flow skill. |

---

## Critical Domain Knowledge

These non-obvious facts cause **silent failures** if violated. Each has a corresponding diagnostic triplet.

### 1. VIC runoff is mm/timestep, mizuRoute expects mm/s (dt_m003)

VIC reports RUNOFF and BASEFLOW in mm per model timestep:
- Daily output: mm/day -> divide by 86400 -> mm/s
- 3-hourly output: mm/3hr -> divide by 10800 -> mm/s

**If wrong**: Discharge is 8x or 86400x too high/low with NO error message. This is the #1 silent error risk.

**Quick check**: In the runoff NetCDF, max(RUNOFF) should be < 0.01 mm/s for most basins. If > 1.0 mm/s, units are wrong.

### 2. Variable names must match exactly (dt_m004)

The control file `vname_*` entries must match the exact variable names in the network topology and runoff NetCDF files. Different data sources use different names:
- HydroCraft tools: `seg_id`, `tosegment`, `seg_length`, `seg_slope`
- NHDPlus: `COMID`, `toComid`, `LENGTHKM`, `SLOPE`
- MERIT Hydro: `RIVID`, `NextDownID`, `rivlen`, `rivslp`

### 3. Reach slope must be > 0 (dt_m007)

DEM-derived networks often have zero-slope reaches in flat terrain. Set minimum slope floor: `max(slope, 0.0001)` m/m. Zero slope causes division-by-zero in Manning's equation.

### 4. CFL condition for KWE and DW methods (dt_m009)

KWE and DW are conditionally stable: routing timestep must satisfy `dt < dx/c` (Courant number). Short steep reaches need very small dt. Use IRF or KWT for steep mountain basins unless you specifically need wave dynamics.

### 5. Fortran path length limit (dt_m017)

mizuRoute uses Fortran CHARACTER(256) for file paths. Paths exceeding 256 characters are silently truncated. Keep all paths < 120 characters or use symlinks. Same issue as Lohmann routing.

### 6. Multiple outlets = split flow (dt_m015)

If the network has multiple reaches with `tosegment=0`, water exits through all outlets. This silently reduces discharge at the "main" outlet. Always verify the network has exactly one outlet, or connect secondary outlets.

---

## Coupling Points

| # | Source | Target | Variable | Tool |
|---|--------|--------|----------|------|
| 1 | VIC 5.1.0 | mizuRoute | RUNOFF + BASEFLOW (mm/s) | `convert_vic_runoff` |
| 2 | WRF-Hydro 5.2.0 | mizuRoute | SFCRNOFF + UGDRNOFF (mm/s) | (convert_wrfhydro_runoff) |
| 3 | mizuRoute | plot tools | outlet discharge (m3/s) | `extract_discharge` |
| 4 | mizuRoute | CaMa-Flood | reach discharge at nodes | (future coupling) |

---

## Quick Start

```bash
# Activate HydroCraft venv
source KISSPATH_PYTHON_ENV/bin/activate

TOOLS=KISSPATH_KI_ROOT/mizuRoute/knowledge_infrastructure/tools
RUN=outputs/chaohe_2000_2010_025deg

# 1. Build river network from DEM
python $TOOLS/s1_network/build_network_topology.py \
  --basin_shp data/shp/chaohe_boundary/chaohe_boundary.shp \
  --dem data/dem/china_dem_90m/china_dem_90m.tif \
  --output $RUN/mizuroute_input/network_topology.nc \
  --stream_threshold 500

# 2. Create remap weights (VIC grid -> HRUs)
python $TOOLS/s2_remap/create_remap_weights.py \
  --grid_nc $RUN/vic_temp/grid/basin_grid.nc \
  --network_nc $RUN/mizuroute_input/network_topology.nc \
  --output $RUN/mizuroute_input/remap_weights.nc

# 3. Convert VIC runoff to mizuRoute format
python $TOOLS/s3_runoff/convert_vic_runoff.py \
  --vic_result_dir $RUN/vic_result \
  --grid_nc $RUN/vic_temp/grid/basin_grid.nc \
  --output $RUN/mizuroute_input/runoff.nc \
  --start_year 2000 --end_year 2010

# 4. Generate control file
python $TOOLS/s4_control/generate_control_file.py \
  --basin_name chaohe \
  --network_nc $RUN/mizuroute_input/network_topology.nc \
  --runoff_nc $RUN/mizuroute_input/runoff.nc \
  --remap_nc $RUN/mizuroute_input/remap_weights.nc \
  --output_dir $RUN/mizuroute_output \
  --output $RUN/mizuroute_input/chaohe.control \
  --route_opt 0 --start_date 2000-01-01 --end_date 2010-12-31

# 5. Run mizuRoute
python $TOOLS/s5_execution/run_mizuroute.py \
  --control_file $RUN/mizuroute_input/chaohe.control

# 6. Extract and plot discharge
python $TOOLS/s6_postprocess/extract_discharge.py \
  --mizuroute_output $RUN/mizuroute_output \
  --network_nc $RUN/mizuroute_input/network_topology.nc \
  --output $RUN/mizuroute_discharge.csv
```

---

## Diagnostic Triplets

Triplets covering 7 failure domains (current count: the KI map at the top of this file). See `diagnostics/triplets.yaml` for full details.

| ID | Severity | Domain | Summary |
|----|----------|--------|---------|
| dt_m001 | fatal | compilation | NetCDF library path wrong |
| dt_m002 | fatal | path_resolution | Control file path wrong or Fortran truncation |
| dt_m003 | **silent** | unit_conversion | VIC mm/timestep not converted to mm/s (8-86400x error) |
| dt_m004 | fatal | parameter_format | Variable name mismatch between control file and NetCDF |
| dt_m005 | **silent** | dependency_mismatch | CRS mismatch -> zero overlap -> no runoff to HRUs |
| dt_m006 | fatal | parameter_format | Dangling downstream references in topology |
| dt_m007 | degraded | parameter_format | Zero slope -> unrealistic peak discharge |
| dt_m008 | **silent** | silent_error | Temporal offset VIC vs mizuRoute convention |
| dt_m009 | fatal | runtime | CFL violation with KWE/DW methods |
| dt_m010 | **silent** | dependency_mismatch | Edge HRUs get no VIC runoff |
| dt_m011 | degraded | parameter_format | Lake segments not flagged -> missing lake outflow |
| dt_m012 | fatal | runtime | MPI crash on disconnected network |
| dt_m013 | **silent** | unit_conversion | Calendar/timezone mismatch |
| dt_m014 | warning | parameter_format | doesBasinRoute double-counts hillslope delay |
| dt_m015 | **silent** | silent_error | Multiple outlets -> flow escapes |
| dt_m016 | degraded | dependency_mismatch | Channel losses in MC/DW not in Lohmann |
| dt_m017 | fatal | path_resolution | Fortran CHARACTER truncation |
| dt_m018 | **silent** | silent_error | Width estimation wrong for climate zone |

**Silent error count** (when this section was written): 7/18 (39%) — consistent with cross-model average of 37%.

---

## Validation Status

Run results (site, period, scores) are not kept here. They live in the run records
(`test_runs` in hydrocraft.db and each run's own result files).

### Performance Metrics - Field Convention Bars

**Source**: `docs/validation_convention.yaml`. A run is judged against these cited convention bars, not against intuition. For zero-centered PBIAS, smaller absolute bias is better. The duplicate `routed_discharge` PBIAS convention record is preserved as an extracted KI fact.

| Dag variable | Metric | Direction | Satisfactory band | Good band | Very good band | Citation key |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `routed_discharge` | `nse` | maximize | `0.5` | `0.7` | `0.8` | `moriasi2007`, `moriasi2015` |
| `routed_discharge` | `pbias` | zero_centered | `15.0` | `10.0` | `5.0` | `moriasi2015` |
| `routed_discharge` | `pbias` | zero_centered | `15.0` | `10.0` | `5.0` | `moriasi2015` |
| `basRunoff` | `nse` | maximize | `0.5` | `0.7` | `0.8` | `moriasi2015` |
| `basRunoff` | `pbias` | zero_centered | `15.0` | `10.0` | `5.0` | `moriasi2015` |

The headline metric bars for `routed_discharge` are: NSE satisfactory `0.5` (`moriasi2007`, `moriasi2015`), good `0.7` (`moriasi2007`, `moriasi2015`), very good `0.8` (`moriasi2007`, `moriasi2015`); PBIAS zero-centered satisfactory `15.0` (`moriasi2015`), good `10.0` (`moriasi2015`), very good `5.0` (`moriasi2015`).

**Known Issues (all fixed)**:
1. **MPI serial stub data corruption (FIXED, err_001)**: `MPI_SCATTERV` stub declared buffers as `integer(*)`, causing 4-byte copy steps for 8-byte `real(dp)` data. Tributary HRUs (50%) received corrupted/zero runoff. Fix: multiply count/displacement by `words_per_element` (2 for double precision). Applied to all 7 collective MPI stubs.
2. **PIO serial stub output bug (FIXED, dt_m019)**: `pio_setframe` was a no-op in the serial stub, causing `pio_write_darray` to always write at record position 0.
3. **Multiple outlets**: Grid-based D8 on a 0.25deg grid can create several outlet segments. Sum of all outlets gives correct total discharge. Use finer DEM-based topology for single-outlet production runs (dt_m015).

---

## Bugs Found and Fixed

### dt_m019: PIO serial stub pio_setframe no-op (FIXED 2026-03-22)

**Severity**: silent, **Domain**: output_writing

**Symptom**: Output NetCDF files have only 1 valid timestep per year; remaining ~364 timesteps contain fill values (9.97e+36).

**Root cause**: In `serial_stubs/pio.f90`, the `pio_setframe` subroutine was an empty no-op that ignored the `frame` parameter. The subsequent `pio_write_darray` called `nf90_put_var` without `start` parameter, always writing to position 0.

**Fix**: (1) Added `current_frame` module variable to store the active frame index. (2) `pio_setframe` now sets `current_frame = int(frame)`. (3) `pio_write_darray_*1d` functions now check variable dimensionality and use `start=[1, current_frame]` for variables with a record dimension.

**Impact**: Without fix, only 1 of 365 daily values per year was written. All time-series analysis was impossible.

### err_001: MPI serial stub data corruption — ROOT CAUSE OF LARGE MAGNITUDE LOSS (FIXED 2026-03-22)

**Severity**: fatal, **Domain**: unit_conversion

**Symptom**: `basRunoff` for tributary HRUs (about 50%) is zero, causing a large total discharge magnitude loss. Timing correlation remains correct because the correctly-routed mainstem HRUs have the right temporal pattern.

**Root cause**: Serial MPI stubs (`route/build/serial_stubs/mpi_stubs.f90`) declare all buffer parameters as `integer :: sendbuf(*), recvbuf(*)` (4-byte assumed-size arrays). When `real(dp)` (8-byte double precision) data is passed through `MPI_SCATTERV`, the copy loop `recvbuf(i) = sendbuf(displs(1) + i)` iterates by 4-byte integer steps instead of 8-byte double steps. For `recvcount=N` double-precision elements, only `N * 4` bytes are copied instead of `N * 8` bytes, corrupting the entire tributary HRU runoff array. The `MPI_SCATTERV` stub is used in `scatter_runoff()` to distribute `basinRunoff` from the master proc to the tributary domain.

**Why exactly 50% is zero**: mizuRoute splits HRUs into "mainstem" and "tributary" domains for parallel processing. In serial mode (1 proc), mainstem HRUs are copied via a direct Fortran assignment (works correctly), while tributary HRUs are distributed via `MPI_SCATTERV` (corrupted by the bug).

**Fix**: In each MPI stub function, determine `words_per_element` from the `datatype` parameter: 2 for `MPI_DOUBLE_PRECISION` (=3) and `MPI_INTEGER8` (=2), 1 for `MPI_INTEGER` (=1) and `MPI_REAL` (=4). Multiply element count and displacement by `words_per_element` before the copy loop. Applied to all 7 collective operations: `MPI_SCATTERV`, `MPI_GATHERV`, `MPI_ALLGATHERV`, `MPI_ALLGATHER`, `MPI_Alltoallv`, `MPI_REDUCE`, `MPI_ALLREDUCE`.

**Impact**: After fix, basRunoff ratio = 1.0000 (exact mass conservation).

**Discovery method**: Systematic per-HRU comparison of input vs output basRunoff. Exactly 112/224 HRUs had zero, and the zero set corresponded to output positions 112-223 (topologically-sorted tributary domain). Traced through the data flow: `sort_flux` -> `scatter_runoff` -> `MPI_SCATTERV` -> corrupted `basinRunoff_trib`.

---

## File Structure

```
models/mizuRoute/knowledge_infrastructure/
  DISSECTION_PLAN.md              # Original dissection plan
  SKILL.md                        # This file (agent entry point)
  knowledge_infrastructure.yaml   # Schema-compliant package definition
  tools/
    s1_network/
      build_network_topology.py   # DEM -> river network topology
    s2_remap/
      create_remap_weights.py     # VIC grid -> HRU spatial weights
    s3_runoff/
      convert_vic_runoff.py       # VIC flux -> mizuRoute runoff NetCDF
    s4_control/
      generate_control_file.py    # Generate control file
    s5_execution/
      run_mizuroute.py            # Execution wrapper with validation
    s6_postprocess/
      extract_discharge.py        # Extract Q timeseries + metrics
      compare_routing_methods.py  # 5-method comparison
  docs/
    s0_config_skill.md            # Routing method selection
    s1_network_skill.md           # Network construction
    s2_remap_skill.md             # Spatial remapping
    s3_runoff_skill.md            # Unit conversion
    s4_control_skill.md           # Control file reference
    s5_execution_skill.md         # Running mizuRoute
    s6_comparison_skill.md        # Method comparison
    s_lake_routing_skill.md       # Lake/reservoir routing
  diagnostics/
    triplets.yaml                 # diagnostic triplets (count: KI map)
    error_log.yaml                # Runtime error capture

model/mizuRoute/
  mizuRoute-main/                 # Source code (from GitHub)
    route/bin/mizuroute.exe       # Compiled binary
    route/build/                  # Build system
      Makefile.serial             # Serial build Makefile
      serial_stubs/               # MPI/PIO stubs for serial compilation
  build_serial.sh                 # One-command serial build script
```

Files in this skill

  • DISSECTION_PLAN.md35.2 KB
  • README.md21.2 KB
  • SKILL.md30.6 KB
  • dag.yaml31.9 KB
  • diagnostics/error_log.yaml909 B
  • diagnostics/triplets.yaml20.6 KB
  • docs/REFERENCES.md1.1 KB
  • docs/format_spec.yaml23.5 KB
  • docs/papers.json4.2 KB
  • docs/s0_config_skill.md2.7 KB
  • docs/s1_network_skill.md1.7 KB
  • docs/s2_remap_skill.md1.1 KB
  • docs/s3_runoff_skill.md3.9 KB
  • docs/s4_control_skill.md2 KB
  • docs/s5_execution_skill.md1.5 KB
  • docs/s6_comparison_skill.md2.2 KB
  • docs/s_lake_routing_skill.md1.9 KB
  • docs/validation_convention.yaml12.9 KB
  • knowledge_infrastructure.yaml3.5 KB
  • preflight_check.py11 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in research →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.