Generates Feature Requirements documentation from any combination of inputs -- PRDs, design files/Figma URLs, meeting transcripts, or verbal descriptions. Focuses exclusively on requirements; API contracts and system flows are generated separately after requirements are finalized. Runs in Quick mode (3 contexts, ~15 min) for MVPs/small features or Comprehensive mode (6 contexts, ~30 min) for production/complex features. Use when asked to: generate requirements, write a feature spec, create a ...
Scanned 9/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add luokai0/ai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai --skill generate-requirements --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Generate Requirements?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/luokai0-generate-requirements)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: generate-requirements
description: "Generates Feature Requirements documentation from any combination of inputs -- PRDs, design files/Figma URLs, meeting transcripts, or verbal descriptions. Focuses exclusively on requirements; API contracts and system flows are generated separately after requirements are finalized. Runs in Quick mode (3 contexts, ~15 min) for MVPs/small features or Comprehensive mode (6 contexts, ~30 min) for production/complex features. Use when asked to: generate requirements, write a feature spec, create a PRD, or document a feature."
---
# Generate Requirements — Entry Orchestrator
## NON-NEGOTIABLE (read first)
1. Never fabricate data, business rules, or field names. Mark unknowns as [TBD].
2. Save every output file before presenting in chat. Chat is ephemeral.
3. Wait for user approval at every checkpoint. Never auto-proceed.
4. Requirements describe WHAT, never HOW (solution) or WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (design).
5. Source traceability on every claim. Unsourced = flag as [TBD].
## Critical Rules
1. **Never skip steps** — The three workflows must run in order
2. **Always save files** — Every output is saved to the workspace, not just shown in chat
3. **Mark TBDs honestly** — Never invent business rules, performance targets, or field names
4. **Wait at checkpoints** — After each workflow, STOP and wait for user approval before continuing
5. **One skill at a time** — Complete each workflow file fully before reading the next
6. **Respect existing patterns** — If Swagger is provided, follow its naming and error conventions
---
## 🎯 Purpose
This skill generates production-ready Agile requirements documentation from messy inputs.
It orchestrates three sequential workflows, each saved as a file, so context survives across long sessions.
**What you'll get:**
- `[output-folder]/Context-Summary-[Feature].md` — internal analysis artifact
- `[output-folder]/Generated/Internal/Feature-Requirements-[Feature].md` — always generated
- `[output-folder]/Generated/Report/Validation-Report-[Feature].md` — quality gate report
`[output-folder]` is provided by the user during intake (Step 2). There is no default — always ask.
> **Note:** This skill focuses on Feature Requirements only. API Contracts and System Flows are generated separately after requirements are finalized, using `/rest-api-contract-generator` and a dedicated system flow skill respectively.
**Core principle: Truth over completeness.** Mark unknowns as [TBD]. Never fabricate data.
---
## 🔗 When Called from `/requirements-pipeline` (Stage 7)
When this skill is invoked from the `/requirements-pipeline`, **skip Steps 1-3 entirely** (workspace scan, project context loading, intake questions, pre-flight checks). The pipeline has already completed all of this.
The pipeline provides:
- **Feature name** -- from Stage 1
- **Mode** -- always Comprehensive
- **All inputs** -- processed and verified in Stages 1-6 (including scenario matrix, assumptions, user flows)
- **Output folder** -- asked by the pipeline at Stage 7 if not already known
- **Project context** -- loaded by the pipeline at Stage 1.1 if `project-context.md` exists
- **Current state** -- from pipeline Stage 1.5
Go directly to **Step 4** (Start Synthesis Workflow) with all values pre-loaded, then read `workflows/01-synthesize.md`.
---
## 🔄 Workflow Chain
This skill chains three workflows in sequence:
```
[You are here]
SKILL.md (Intake)
↓ reads
workflows/01-synthesize.md → saves Context-Summary-[Feature].md
↓ reads
workflows/02-generate.md → saves requirement doc(s)
↓ reads
workflows/03-validate.md → saves Validation-Report-[Feature].md
```
Each workflow file is read in turn. Do NOT skip ahead.
---
## 📥 Step 1: Scan Workspace for Available Inputs
Before asking the user anything, scan the workspace folder for relevant files:
```bash
ls [workspace]
ls [workspace]/requirements/ # check for existing project context and prior sessions
```
Look for:
- `project-context.md` — **project-level context file** (pre-populates most questions if present)
- `**/Context-Summary-*.md` — prior session summaries (useful for resume)
- `*.md`, `*.pdf`, `*.docx` — likely PRDs or specs
- `*.yaml`, `*.json`, `*.yml` — likely Swagger/OpenAPI specs
- `*.png`, `*.jpg`, `*.figma` — likely design files
- `*transcript*`, `*notes*`, `*meeting*` — likely transcripts
Report what you found:
```
📂 Found in workspace:
- project-context.md: ✅ Found — project memory loaded / ❌ Not found
- [other files found]
```
---
## 🗂️ Step 1.5: Load Project Context (IF project-context.md exists)
**IF `project-context.md` is found in the workspace root:**
1. Read the file completely
2. Extract and cache internally:
- Tech stack (frontend, backend, DB)
- API conventions (auth, naming, error shape, pagination)
- Defined personas (names, roles, pain points)
- System components and integrations
- Compliance baseline
- Browser/device support
- Project-wide out-of-scope items
- Glossary
3. Announce what was loaded:
```
✅ Project context loaded from project-context.md
I already know:
- Stack: [Frontend] + [Backend] + [DB]
- Auth: [method]
- Personas: [Persona 1 name], [Persona 2 name]
- Integrations: [count] pre-defined
I only need feature-specific information.
```
**This context is automatically applied to Workflow 1 (Synthesis) and pre-populates:**
- Technical Context (stack, conventions, integrations)
- Persona Context (uses existing personas; new ones flagged for update)
- Compliance Context (uses baseline; overrides noted per feature)
**IF `project-context.md` is NOT found:**
Proceed to Step 2 as normal. After the session completes, offer:
```
💡 This is the first time I've run on this project. Want me to create a
project-context.md file from what I learned? This will save time on
future features.
```
---
## 📋 Step 2: Gather Required Context
**IF project-context.md was loaded**, ask only what's missing:
```
I have your project context. For this feature, I need:
1. **Feature name** — What is this feature called?
2. **Feature-specific inputs** — Do you have any of these for this feature?
- [ ] PRD or feature description
- [ ] Design files (Figma URL or images)
- [ ] Swagger changes / new endpoints
- [ ] Meeting transcript or notes
- [ ] Just your description in this chat
3. **New or existing feature?**
- A) New feature (greenfield)
- B) Modifying an existing feature
4. **Scope?**
- A) Quick Mode — lightweight analysis, 3 contexts (Business, Product, UX). Best for MVPs, small changes, internal tools.
- B) Comprehensive Mode — full analysis, 6 contexts (adds Persona, Technical, Compliance). Best for production features, complex integrations, compliance-sensitive work.
- C) Suggest based on inputs
5. **Output folder** — Where should generated documents be saved?
Provide the path to the folder (e.g., `Product Artifacts/Feature Requirements/MyFeature`).
The skill will create `Generated/Internal/` and `Generated/Report/` subdirectories inside it.
```
**IF project-context.md was NOT loaded**, ask the full set:
```
To generate requirements, I need a few details:
1. **Feature name** — What is this feature called?
2. **Inputs available** — Which of these do you have?
- [ ] PRD or feature description document
- [ ] Design files (Figma URL or images)
- [ ] Swagger/OpenAPI specification
- [ ] Meeting transcript or notes
- [ ] Just your description in this chat
3. **New or existing feature?**
- A) New feature (greenfield)
- B) Modifying an existing feature
4. **Scope?**
- A) Quick Mode — lightweight analysis, 3 contexts (Business, Product, UX). Best for MVPs, small changes, internal tools. (~15 min)
- B) Comprehensive Mode — full analysis, 6 contexts (adds Persona, Technical, Compliance). Best for production features, complex integrations, compliance-sensitive work. (~30 min)
- C) Not sure — I'll suggest based on your inputs
5. **Output folder** — Where should generated documents be saved?
Provide the path to the folder (e.g., `Product Artifacts/Feature Requirements/MyFeature`).
The skill will create `Generated/Internal/` and `Generated/Report/` subdirectories inside it.
```
**Mode inference (if user selects C):**
- Multiple actors, complex interactions, compliance concerns → Comprehensive
- External system integrations or dependencies → Comprehensive
- Simple UI-only feature, single actor, low risk → Quick
- Production deadline / enterprise context → Comprehensive
- State recommendation: "Based on your inputs, I recommend [Mode] because [reason]. Confirm?"
---
## ⚡ Step 3: Pre-Flight Checks
Before starting synthesis, confirm:
| Check | Source | Action if missing |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Feature name captured | User input | Required — ask |
| At least 1 input source | User input or workspace scan | Required — verbal description qualifies |
| Mode determined | Inferred or confirmed | Required — infer or ask |
| Output folder confirmed | User input | Required — ask. No default; user must provide the path. |
| Project context loaded? | project-context.md | If found: pre-populated. If not: proceed without it |
| Design files provided? | Workspace or user | Note: "I'll analyze designs in Workflow 1" |
| Transcript provided? | Workspace or user | Note: "I'll extract decisions from transcript in Workflow 1" |
**Output folder structure:**
The user provides `[output-folder]` during intake. The skill creates subdirectories inside it:
```
[output-folder]/
├── Context-Summary-[Feature].md ← analysis artifact
├── Generated/
│ ├── Internal/
│ │ └── Feature-Requirements-[Feature].md ← requirements document
│ └── Report/
│ └── Validation-Report-[Feature].md ← quality gate
```
Create the `Generated/Internal/` and `Generated/Report/` subdirectories when saving files. The project-context.md stays in the workspace root (not inside the feature folder).
---
## 🚀 Step 4: Start Synthesis Workflow
Once intake is complete, confirm what you have and what's pre-loaded:
```
✅ Ready to start.
Feature: [name]
Mode: [Quick / Comprehensive]
Inputs: [list]
Project context: ✅ Loaded ([N] contexts pre-populated) / ❌ Not found (starting fresh)
Output folder: [output-folder]/
Internal docs → [output-folder]/Generated/Internal/
Reports → [output-folder]/Generated/Report/
Starting Workflow 1: Context Synthesis...
```
Pass the following to Workflow 1:
- Feature name
- Mode (Quick / Comprehensive)
- Input sources list
- Output folder path (user-provided)
- Project context (if loaded) — mark which contexts are pre-populated vs need feature-specific input
- Whether "verify existing" (Step 0.5) should run
Then **read the file:**
```
workflows/01-synthesize.md
```
Follow that file's instructions completely from start to finish.
---
## 📎 Related Skills (Complementary)
These existing skills can assist with specific inputs before running this workflow:
| Situation | Skill to suggest |
|-----------|-----------------|
| User has a meeting recording or .vtt transcript | `transcript-to-meeting-notes` — process first, use output as PRD input |
| User has Figma URL or design screenshots | Design analysis is built into this skill's Workflow 1 |
| Requirements are finalized and need API contracts | `rest-api-contract-generator` — run after requirements are stable |
| Requirements are finalized and need system flow docs | Future: `system-flow-generator` — run after requirements are stable |
---
---
## 🔄 After All Workflows Complete: Update Project Context
When Workflow 3 (Validation) finishes, offer to create or update the project context:
```
To capture what was learned in this session (new personas, systems,
constraints, terminology), run /project-context to create or update
your project-context.md.
This is optional but recommended -- it saves time on future sessions.
```
The `/project-context` skill handles both first-time creation and incremental updates with source confirmation and conflict detection. Do NOT attempt to create or update `project-context.md` inline.
---
**INTAKE COMPLETE → Read `workflows/01-synthesize.md` to begin**
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!