Use when applying semi-supervised learning techniques.
Scanned 9/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add LoopyLuci/Skills --skill semi-supervised-learning --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Semi Supervised Learning?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/loopyluci-semi-supervised-learning)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: semi-supervised-learning
description: "Use when applying semi-supervised learning techniques."
version: 1.0.0
author: Hermes Agent
license: MIT
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [semi-supervised, pseudo-labeling, consistency-regularization, self-training, label-propagation]
related_skills: [self-supervised-learning, active-learning-strategies, data-augmentation-techniques, transfer-learning-patterns]
---
# Semi-Supervised Learning
Applying semi-supervised learning techniques to leverage unlabeled data — from self-training and pseudo-labeling through consistency regularization and hybrid approaches.
## When to Use
- Labeled data is scarce but unlabeled data is abundant
- Reducing labeling costs while maintaining model quality
- Improving model robustness with unlabeled examples
- Cold-start scenarios with limited initial labels
- Building models where labeling requires expert time
## Key Methods
```python
SEMI_SUPERVISED_METHODS = {
'self_training': 'Train on labeled, predict unlabeled, add high-confidence predictions as pseudo-labels, retrain',
'consistency_regularization': 'Apply different augmentations to same input, penalize prediction differences',
'mixmatch': 'Mix labeled and unlabeled data, apply MixUp between them',
'fixmatch': 'Generate pseudo-labels from weakly-augmented data, enforce on strongly-augmented version',
'label_propagation': 'Propagate labels through similarity graph of labeled to unlabeled examples',
}
class FixMatch:
"""FixMatch: simplified consistency regularization."""
def __init__(self, model, threshold=0.95, weight_ul=1.0):
self.model = model
self.threshold = threshold
self.weight_ul = weight_ul
def train_step(self, labeled_x, labeled_y, unlabeled_x, weak_aug, strong_aug):
# Supervised loss on labeled
logits_labeled = self.model(labeled_x)
loss_s = F.cross_entropy(logits_labeled, labeled_y)
# Pseudo-label unlabeled data using weakly-augmented version
with torch.no_grad():
weak_out = self.model(weak_aug(unlabeled_x))
probs = F.softmax(weak_out, dim=1)
max_probs, pseudo_labels = probs.max(dim=1)
mask = max_probs >= self.threshold
# Apply on strongly-augmented version
strong_out = self.model(strong_aug(unlabeled_x))
loss_u = F.cross_entropy(strong_out, pseudo_labels, reduction='none') * mask
loss_u = loss_u.mean()
return loss_s + self.weight_ul * loss_u
```
## Common Pitfalls
1. **Noisy pseudo-labels** — low-quality pseudo-labels hurt more than help; use confidence threshold
2. **Distribution mismatch** — unlabeled data from different distribution than labeled; filter OOD
3. **Confirmation bias** — model reinforces its own mistakes in pseudo-labels; use augmentations
4. **Class imbalance** — pseudo-labels skew toward majority class; use class-balanced sampling
5. **Too little labeled data** — with <5 labeled examples per class, even SSL struggles
## Verification Checklist
- [ ] Labeled and unlabeled data from same distribution
- [ ] Pseudo-label confidence threshold tuned (eg 0.95)
- [ ] Strong vs weak augmentation strategies defined
- [ ] SSL method matches data size (FixMatch for <100 labels, MixMatch for more)
- [ ] Ablation: labeled-only baseline vs SSL improvement measured
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!