Analyze a codebase end-to-end, extract its functionalities, roles and access model, then produce a colorful, role-based user-flow map. Preferred output is a FigJam diagram in Figma (via the Figma MCP); when the Figma MCP is not set up, it falls back to writing a self-contained Markdown file with the flow drawn as a Mermaid diagram. Use when the user asks to "map the project", "map the user flow(s)", "diagram how the tool works", "make a flowchart of the app", "figjam of the project", "user jo...
Scanned 8/30/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add lmohamed95/claude-project-flow-map --skill project-flow-map --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Project Flow Map?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lmohamed95-project-flow-map)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: project-flow-map
description: >-
Analyze a codebase end-to-end, extract its functionalities, roles and access
model, then produce a colorful, role-based user-flow map. Preferred output is a
FigJam diagram in Figma (via the Figma MCP); when the Figma MCP is not set up,
it falls back to writing a self-contained Markdown file with the flow drawn as
a Mermaid diagram. Use when the user asks to "map the project", "map the user
flow(s)", "diagram how the tool works", "make a flowchart of the app", "figjam
of the project", "user journey / user flow mapping", or wants a visual overview
of a tool's features, roles and screens. Works for any project (web app,
back-office, SaaS, API+UI).
---
# Project Flow Map
Turn a codebase into a **role-based, color-coded user-flow map**.
There are two output modes:
- **FigJam (preferred)** — a Mermaid flowchart generated through the Figma MCP
(`generate_diagram`), organized in swimlane zones (access, one per role,
central lifecycle, entity states) with a legend and consistent colors.
- **Markdown fallback** — when the Figma MCP is **not** available, write a
self-contained `PROJECT-FLOW-MAP.md` file with the same analysis and the flow
drawn as a ` ```mermaid ` block. This renders as a diagram on GitHub, GitLab,
VS Code, Obsidian, Notion and most Markdown viewers — no Figma account needed.
This skill has four phases: **Analyze → Confirm scope → Generate → Present**. Do
the analysis for real from the code — never invent modules or roles.
---
## Phase 1 — Analyze the project
Read the code to build a factual model. Prefer delegating broad reads to
`Explore`/`general-purpose` agents when the repo is large; otherwise read
directly. Look for, in roughly this order:
1. **Entry & stack** — `package.json`, framework (Next/Vite/etc.), README, and
any `AGENTS.md` / `CLAUDE.md` (often the richest summary — read it first if
present, but verify against real code).
2. **Routing** — the route table / router (`App.tsx`, `router.tsx`, `app/`
folder, route configs). This is the module list.
3. **Navigation** — the sidebar / topbar / menu component. Gives the user-facing
grouping of modules.
4. **Auth & access** — auth provider/context, login page, session gating,
middleware. Capture the **entry flow**: login → session valid? → tenant/org
check → app.
5. **Roles & permissions** — role enums (DB migrations, `roles` /
`memberships` / `*_user_roles` tables, constraints like `CHECK (role IN
...)`), membership status lifecycle (invited/active/disabled), and whether
roles are **actually enforced in the UI** or only modeled. Note this
explicitly.
6. **Domain model & lifecycles** — entity types and their **status enums**
(reservation, order, ticket, invoice, vehicle, etc.). Each status enum is a
mini state machine worth drawing.
7. **Per-module functionality + maturity** — for each module, list what it does
and flag **real vs placeholder** (look for "coming soon" modals, disabled
buttons, mock/stub data, `TODO`, feature flags). The as-built vs intended
distinction matters a lot for an honest map.
Produce (in your head or as a short written analysis for the user): module map,
roles + access model, entity lifecycles, and the **central operational flow**
(the one core end-to-end journey the whole tool exists to serve — e.g. a
reservation lifecycle, an order-to-cash, a ticket resolution).
Deliver a concise written summary of this analysis to the user before drawing —
it is valuable on its own and lets them correct you.
---
## Phase 2 — Confirm scope & pick output mode
**Detect the output mode first.** Check whether the Figma MCP is available:
- If Figma MCP tools are present (possibly deferred — searchable via
`ToolSearch` for `mcp__*Figma__generate_diagram`), use **FigJam** (Phase 3A).
- If they are **not** available / not configured, tell the user briefly that
Figma MCP isn't set up so you'll produce a **Markdown flow map** instead
(Phase 3B), and mention they can wire up the Figma MCP later for a live FigJam
board (see the repo README). Do not block on it — just proceed with Markdown.
Then, unless the user already told you, ask **once** (use `AskUserQuestion`) with
sane defaults:
- **Structure** — by role *(default when the app has ≥2 roles)* · single
end-to-end flow · by module.
If Figma MCP *is* available, also confirm **Format** — FigJam flowchart
*(default, recommended)* · Markdown file · both.
If the app has no real role system, skip the role question and default to
end-to-end or by-module. Don't over-ask — if the user said "like before" or gave
enough direction, just build it.
---
## Mermaid conventions (shared by both output modes — respect exactly)
- `flowchart LR` at the top; give each zone its own `subgraph ... direction TB`.
- **Quote every label and edge label**: `["Text"]`, `-->|"label"|`,
`-. "label" .->`.
- **No emojis. No literal `\n`.** Keep node IDs short, unique, alphanumeric.
- Never use the word `end` as a node id or in a className.
- Use `{"..."}` diamonds for decision points.
- Use dotted links `-. "..." .->` for **cross-zone** relations (supervision,
hand-offs, status side-effects); solid arrows for the primary path within a
zone.
- Keep it detailed only as far as it stays readable (~40–70 nodes is a good
ceiling). If bigger, split into multiple diagrams.
### Zone structure (typical, adapt to the project)
1. **Legend** — one node per color + what dashed/diamonds mean.
2. **Access & session** — login → `{session valid?}` → `{tenant/role?}` →
dashboard.
3. **One subgraph per role** — the modules & key actions that role owns; for an
owner/admin include the **member lifecycle** (invite → active → change role →
disable).
4. **Central lifecycle** — the core end-to-end journey with its status nodes and
decision branches.
5. **Entity state machines** (optional) — e.g. vehicle/order status, linked with
dotted "status change" edges from the steps that trigger them.
Route each role from the access aiguillage: `ROLE -->|"role name"| firstNode`.
### Reusable color palette (paste, then assign classes)
```
classDef entry fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#2563eb,color:#1e3a8a
classDef decision fill:#fde68a,stroke:#d97706,color:#78350f
classDef roleA fill:#ede9fe,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#4c1d95
classDef roleB fill:#ffedd5,stroke:#ea580c,color:#7c2d12
classDef roleC fill:#cffafe,stroke:#0891b2,color:#164e63
classDef roleD fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#14532d
classDef core fill:#ffe4e6,stroke:#e11d48,color:#881337
classDef state fill:#f1f5f9,stroke:#64748b,color:#0f172a
classDef planned fill:#faf5ff,stroke:#a855f7,color:#6b21a8,stroke-dasharray:5 4
classDef legend fill:#f8fafc,stroke:#94a3b8,color:#334155
```
Then `class Node1,Node2 roleA` etc. Give **decision diamonds** the `decision`
class, and **placeholder / not-yet-built / target-V1 actions** the `planned`
(dashed) class — this makes as-built vs intended visible at a glance.
---
## Phase 3A — Generate the FigJam diagram (Figma MCP available)
Use the Figma MCP tool **`generate_diagram`** (it creates its own FigJam file —
do NOT call `create_new_file` first). In this harness the Figma tools may be
deferred: load them with `ToolSearch` (`select:mcp__claude_ai_Figma__whoami,
mcp__claude_ai_Figma__generate_diagram`) before calling.
Steps:
1. **Get the plan key** — call `whoami`. Use the single plan's `key`
(`team::...` / `organization::...`). If several plans, ask which.
2. **Write Mermaid** following the conventions above.
3. **Call `generate_diagram`** with `name`, `mermaidSyntax`, `planKey`, and a
short `userIntent`. To add to an existing board instead of a new one, pass
its `fileKey`.
---
## Phase 3B — Generate the Markdown flow map (Figma MCP not set up)
Write a single self-contained file, default name **`PROJECT-FLOW-MAP.md`**, in
the repo root (or a path the user asked for). Use this structure:
```markdown
# <Project> — User Flow Map
> Generated by the `project-flow-map` skill. Diagram renders on GitHub, GitLab,
> VS Code (Markdown preview), Obsidian and Notion. For a live, editable board,
> set up the Figma MCP and re-run (see below).
## Overview
<2–4 sentences: what the tool is, the core journey, roles.>
## Roles & access model
<bullet list of roles + whether permissions are enforced or only intended.>
## Flow map
```mermaid
flowchart LR
%% ...full diagram following the Mermaid conventions above...
```
## Legend
- Blue = entry/session · Yellow diamond = decision · Purple/Orange/… = per role
- Red = core lifecycle · Grey = entity states · Dashed = placeholder / target (not built)
## Honest caveats
<which flows are real vs placeholder; which role permissions are enforced vs intended.>
## Upgrade to a live FigJam board
Set up the Figma MCP (see repo README), then re-run the skill for an editable diagram.
```
Notes:
- Put the diagram in a fenced ` ```mermaid ` block so it renders as a picture,
not code. The **exact same Mermaid conventions and color palette above apply**
— `classDef` colors render on GitHub and most viewers.
- Keep everything in **one** `.md` file so it's trivial to commit and share.
- After writing, tell the user the file path and that they can preview it in VS
Code (`Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+V`) or view it on GitHub.
---
## Phase 4 — Present
**If FigJam:**
- Give the **claim URL** as a clickable link and note that opening it the first
time attaches the board to the user's Figma account (mention their seat may be
*View* only, so editing shapes may need an *Edit* seat).
**If Markdown:**
- Give the **file path** as a clickable link and how to preview it (VS Code
Markdown preview / push to GitHub). Note that Figma MCP would produce an
editable board instead.
**Both:**
- Summarize the zones and the color key.
- State the **honest caveats** surfaced in analysis: which flows are real vs
placeholder, and — critically — whether role permissions are *enforced* or
only *intended* (mark intended paths as "cible / target", drawn dashed).
- Offer concrete next steps: add a zone (e.g. Documents), detail a sub-flow,
produce an end-to-end variant, or generate screen frames.
## Gotchas
- `generate_diagram` supports only graph/flowchart/sequence/state/gantt/ER — not
arbitrary Figma design. For screen mockups use the design-generation Figma
flow instead (see the Figma MCP `use_figma` / `figma-generate-design` skill).
- It can't reposition individual shapes or change fonts after creation — tell the
user to open the board in Figma for manual tweaks.
- If a `generate_diagram` call fails, read the returned error; usually it's a
Mermaid syntax issue (unquoted label, stray `end`, or an emoji). The same
syntax rules make the Markdown fallback render cleanly — so if you ever fail
in FigJam, you can still deliver the identical diagram as Markdown.
- Base every node on real code. If unsure whether something is wired up, read the
handler/page before drawing it as "real".
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!