Special Educational Needs Quality Audit

---
name: special-educational-needs-quality-audit
description: |
  Audit the quality of SEN coordinator and specialist teacher work in mainstream and specialist school settings and drive measurable improvement.
  TRIGGERS - Use when a SEN coordinator and specialist teacher needs a quality audit for children and young people with special educational needs, and their families in mainstream and specialist school settings.
category: Special Educational Needs
license: MIT
version: 1.0
---
# Quality Audit — Special Educational Needs

Audit the quality of SEN coordinator and specialist teacher work in mainstream and specialist school settings and drive measurable improvement. The deliverable is an audit report with scores, evidence and an improvement plan.
This skill is written for a SEN coordinator and specialist teacher working with children and young people with special educational needs, and their families in mainstream and specialist school settings.

## When to use
- You are a SEN coordinator and specialist teacher preparing, delivering or reviewing this part of your work in mainstream and specialist school settings.
- You need a defensible, repeatable approach that produces an audit report with scores, evidence and an improvement plan.
- A colleague, auditor or client asks how this was done and what evidence supports it.

## Key Concepts
| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| EHCP | an education, health and care plan for a child with complex needs |
| Provision | the support and resources provided to meet needs |
| Annual review | the yearly meeting reviewing a child's plan and progress |

## Workflow
1. **Step 1** - Define the audit sample and criteria up front, anchored to plan review timeliness and the standards for mainstream and specialist school settings
2. **Step 2** - Review a sample of education and health care plans and observe practice where permitted, scoring consistently
3. **Step 3** - Separate isolated errors from patterns — patterns point to system fixes, not individual blame
4. **Step 4** - Report findings with evidence, and agree improvement actions that address the root causes, including unmet needs in plans
5. **Step 5** - Re-audit after the agreed interval and publish the change in scores so improvement is visible

## Profession-Specific Components
| Component | Details for Special Educational Needs |
|-----------|-------------------------------|
| Core documentation | education and health care plans; individual support plans; assessment reports; review documents |
| Core tools & equipment | assessment tools; communication aids; tracking systems; multi-agency portals |
| People involved | children and young people with special educational needs, and their families; the SEN coordinator and specialist teacher; colleagues and other services in mainstream and specialist school settings |
| Primary record | education and health care plans — keep it current, dated and attributable |

## Output Format
**Context:** [Situation in mainstream and specialist school settings] | **Objective:** [What this must achieve] | **Audience:** [children and young people with special educational needs, and their families and other stakeholders]

The finished output is an audit report with scores, evidence and an improvement plan, structured as:
1. Summary of position and evidence
2. Detail, following the workflow above
3. Decisions, actions, owners and dates
4. Review point and escalation route

### Action Plan
1. **Immediate:** Confirm scope, consent and the evidence available in education and health care plans.
2. **Short-term:** Complete the workflow steps and record outcomes against plan review timeliness.
3. **Medium-term:** Review results, close actions, and update local procedures in mainstream and specialist school settings.

## Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Method |
|--------|--------|--------|
| plan review timeliness | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from education and health care plans and reviewed on a set cycle |
| progress against outcomes | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from education and health care plans and reviewed on a set cycle |
| parent satisfaction | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from education and health care plans and reviewed on a set cycle |
| provision mapping accuracy | Agree a local target and track the trend | Measured from education and health care plans and reviewed on a set cycle |

## Guardrails & Quality Checks
- Never let this happen: unmet needs in plans.
- Never let this happen: review deadlines missed.
- Never let this happen: provision not delivered as specified.
- Work only within the competence and authority of a SEN coordinator and specialist teacher; escalate or refer anything beyond it.
- Record facts and observations, not speculation, and keep records confidential to mainstream and specialist school settings's rules.
- Verify names, dates, figures and measurements twice before anything is issued or signed off.
- Use only real, verified information from the case in hand — never invent results, credentials or evidence.

## Example (illustrative)
A SEN coordinator and specialist teacher in mainstream and specialist school settings applies this workflow for children and young people with special educational needs, and their families: they open
education and health care plans, work through the five steps using assessment tools, and close by recording
the outcome against plan review timeliness and agreeing the next review date. (Illustrative example only —
replace with the real details of the case in hand.)