Skip to content
Back to skills

Ln 403 Task Rework

ASecurity

Fixes tasks in To Rework and returns them to To Review. Applies reviewer feedback only for the selected task.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 7, 2026
documentationgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 7, 2026

npx -y skills add levalencia/agent-god-mode --skill ln-403-task-rework --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ln 403 Task Rework?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ln 403 Task Rework
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/levalencia-ln-403-task-rework/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/levalencia-ln-403-task-rework)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ln-403-task-rework
description: Fixes tasks in To Rework and returns them to To Review. Applies reviewer feedback only for the selected task.
license: MIT
---

> **Paths:** File paths (`shared/`, `references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

# Task Rework Executor

Executes rework for a single task marked To Rework and hands it back for review.

## Purpose & Scope
- Load full task, reviewer comments, and parent Story; understand requested changes.
- Apply fixes per feedback, keep KISS/YAGNI, and align with guides/Technical Approach.
- Update only this task: To Rework -> In Progress -> To Review; no other tasks touched.

## Inputs

| Input | Required | Source | Description |
|-------|----------|--------|-------------|
| `taskId` | Yes | args, parent Story, kanban, user | Task to rework |

**Resolution:** Task Resolution Chain.
**Status filter:** To Rework

## Task Storage Mode

**MANDATORY READ:** Load `shared/references/tools_config_guide.md`, `shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md`, and `shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md`

Extract: `task_provider` = Task Management → Provider (`linear` | `file`).

| Aspect | Linear Mode | File Mode |
|--------|-------------|-----------|
| **Load task** | `get_issue(task_id)` | `Read("docs/tasks/epics/.../tasks/T{NNN}-*.md")` |
| **Load review notes** | Linear comments | Review section in task file or kanban |
| **Update status** | `save_issue(id, state)` | `Edit` the `**Status:**` line in file |

**File Mode transitions:** To Rework → In Progress → To Review

## Workflow (concise)
1) **Resolve taskId:** Run Task Resolution Chain per guide (status filter: [To Rework]).
2) **Load task:** Read task (Linear: get_issue; File: Read task file), review notes, parent Story.
2b) **Goal gate:** **MANDATORY READ:** `shared/references/goal_articulation_gate.md` — State REAL GOAL of this rework (what was actually broken, not "apply feedback"). Combine with 5 Whys (`shared/references/problem_solving.md`) to ensure root cause is articulated alongside the rework goal. NOT THE GOAL: a superficial patch that addresses the symptom, not the cause.
3) **Plan fixes:** Map each comment to an action; confirm no new scope added.
4) **Implement:** **MANDATORY READ:** `shared/references/code_efficiency_criterion.md` — Follow task plan/checkboxes; address config/hardcoded issues; update docs/tests noted in Affected Components and Existing Code Impact. Before handoff, verify 3 efficiency self-checks.
5) **Quality:** Run typecheck/lint (or project equivalents); ensure fixes reflect guides/manuals/ADRs/research.
6) **Root Cause Analysis:** Ask "Why did the agent produce incorrect code?" Classify: missing context | wrong pattern | unclear AC | gap in docs/templates. If doc/template gap found → update the relevant file (guide, template, CLAUDE.md) to prevent recurrence.
7) **Handoff:** Set task to To Review (Linear: update_issue; File: Edit status line); move it in kanban; add summary comment referencing resolved feedback + root cause classification.

## Critical Rules
- Single-task only; never bulk update.
- Do not mark Done; only To Review (the reviewer decides Done).
- Keep language (EN/RU) consistent with task.
- No new tests/tasks created here; only update existing tests if impacted.
- **Do NOT commit.** Leave all changes uncommitted — the reviewer reviews and commits.

## Definition of Done
- Task and review feedback fully read; actions mapped.
- Fixes applied; docs/tests updated as required.
- Quality checks passed (typecheck/lint or project standards).
- Root cause classified (missing context | wrong pattern | unclear AC | doc gap); doc/template updated if gap found.
- Status set to To Review; kanban updated; summary comment with fixed items + root cause.

## Reference Files
- **Tools config:** `shared/references/tools_config_guide.md`
- **Storage mode operations:** `shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md`
- **[MANDATORY] Problem-solving approach:** `shared/references/problem_solving.md`
- Kanban format: `docs/tasks/kanban_board.md`

---
**Version:** 3.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-23

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…