Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Ln 201 Opportunity Discoverer

ASecurity

Traffic-First opportunity discovery. KILL funnel filters ideas by traffic channel, demand, competition, revenue, interest, MVP-ability. Outputs one idea + one channel recommendation.

3 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/7/2026
researchgobashtestingapi

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/7/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add levalencia/agent-god-mode --skill ln-201-opportunity-discoverer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ln 201 Opportunity Discoverer?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ln 201 Opportunity Discoverer
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/levalencia-ln-201-opportunity-discoverer/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/levalencia-ln-201-opportunity-discoverer)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: ln-201-opportunity-discoverer
description: Traffic-First opportunity discovery. KILL funnel filters ideas by traffic channel, demand, competition, revenue, interest, MVP-ability. Outputs one idea + one channel recommendation.
license: MIT
---

> **Paths:** File paths (`shared/`, `references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

# Opportunity Discoverer

Traffic-First approach to finding next growth direction for existing product.

## Core Philosophy

> **Anti-pattern:** Idea → Surveys → Product → "where's traffic?"
> **Correct:** Traffic → Niche → MVP → Launch under existing demand

### The 90% Developer Bug

Most fail because they:
1. Invent idea with no analogs
2. Ask 5 people "would you pay?" (they say yes for a hot dog)
3. Build product with round sum
4. Launch with "now let's set up traffic"
5. Discover: no traffic exists, never did

**No marketer will build funnel for what cold traffic doesn't buy.**

### Traffic-First Principles

| # | Principle | Anti-pattern |
|---|-----------|--------------|
| 1 | **Traffic exists BEFORE product** | Building then searching for traffic |
| 2 | **No surveys** — measure real search demand | Asking "would you buy?" |
| 3 | **Existing demand** — launch under what people search | Creating new category |
| 4 | **One channel, one idea** — no spreading | Testing 5 channels at once |
| 5 | **KILL early** — fail fast, don't waste time | Scoring all ideas equally |

### Supporting Methodology

**Marc Andreessen (pmarca):**
> "Validate market at practical level — go get paying customers to demonstrate market exists."

**Sam Altman (YC):**
> "Who desperately needs the product? Best answer is going after large part of small market."
> "Test idea by launching or trying to sell — get letter of intent before code."

---

## Purpose & Scope

- Discover growth direction BEFORE Epic creation
- Filter ideas through sequential KILL funnel
- Output: one recommended idea + one traffic channel
- Position: before ln-210 (Epic Coordinator)

## When to Use

**Use this skill when:**
- Product exists, seeking next growth direction
- Have 3-10 potential ideas/niches
- Want to validate opportunity before committing
- Need to choose ONE channel to focus on

**Do NOT use when:**
- No product context (greenfield startup)
- Already have validated direction (skip to ln-210)
- Prioritizing existing Stories (use ln-230)

---

## Input Parameters

| Parameter | Required | Description | Default |
|-----------|----------|-------------|---------|
| ideas | No | Comma-separated list | - |
| context | No | Product description for generation | - |
| strict | No | Strict KILL thresholds | true |

**Input modes:**
- `ideas="idea1, idea2, idea3"` — evaluate list
- `context="SaaS for X"` — generate ideas from product
- Both — generate + add user ideas

---

## KILL Funnel Pipeline

Ideas pass through 6 sequential filters. **Fail any filter = KILL immediately.**

```
Idea → [Traffic?] → [Demand?] → [Competition?] → [Revenue?] → [Interest?] → [MVP?] → SURVIVOR
              ↓           ↓            ↓             ↓            ↓           ↓
            KILL        KILL         KILL          KILL         KILL        KILL
```

### Filter 1: Traffic Channel

**Question:** Where do people look for this solution?

**Research:**
```
WebSearch: "[idea] how people find solutions"
WebSearch: "[idea] customer acquisition channels"
```

**Valid channels:**

| Channel | Signal | Best for |
|---------|--------|----------|
| **Search/SEO** | People Google "[problem] solution" | Info products, tools |
| **YouTube** | Tutorial searches exist | Education, how-to |
| **Marketplaces** | Category exists (ProductHunt, AppStore) | Apps, plugins |
| **Communities** | Active subreddits, forums | Niche products |
| **Paid Ads** | Competitors running ads | Proven demand |
| **Outbound** | Clear ICP, reachable | B2B high-ticket |

**KILL if:** No identifiable channel where people actively look for solution.

**Output:** Channel name + rationale

---

### Filter 2: Existing Demand

**Question:** Are people already searching for this?

**Research:**
```
WebSearch: "[idea] search volume {current_year}"
WebSearch: "[idea] Google Trends"
WebSearch: "[problem] forum discussions reddit"
```

**Demand signals:**

| Signal | Source | Interpretation |
|--------|--------|----------------|
| Search volume | Google Keyword Planner, Ahrefs | Direct demand |
| Trend direction | Google Trends | Growing/declining |
| Forum activity | Reddit, HackerNews, StackOverflow | Pain level |
| Competitor traffic | SimilarWeb, SEMrush | Market size |

**KILL thresholds:**

| Volume | Verdict |
|--------|---------|
| >10K/month | Strong demand |
| 1K-10K/month | Viable niche |
| <1K/month | **KILL** — insufficient demand |

**Output:** Monthly volume estimate + trend

---

### Filter 3: Competition (Blue/Red Ocean)

**Question:** Can we enter this market?

**Research:**
```
WebSearch: "[idea] competitors {current_year}"
WebSearch: "[idea] alternatives comparison"
```

**Classification:**

| Competitors | Index | Ocean | Verdict |
|-------------|-------|-------|---------|
| 0 | 1 | Blue | Opportunity (validate demand exists) |
| 1-2 | 2 | Emerging | Best entry point |
| 3-5 | 3 | Growing | Differentiation needed |
| 6-10 | 4 | Mature | Hard but possible |
| >10 | 5 | Red | **KILL** — commoditized |

**KILL if:** Index 5 (Red Ocean) — too many competitors, race to bottom.

**Output:** Competitor count + Ocean type

---

### Filter 4: Revenue Potential

**Question:** Will people pay enough?

**Research:**
```
WebSearch: "[idea] pricing SaaS"
WebSearch: "[competitor] pricing plans"
WebSearch: "[idea] willingness to pay"
```

**Revenue indicators:**

| ARPU | Market type | Viability |
|------|-------------|-----------|
| >$100/user/mo | Enterprise | High margin |
| $50-100 | Professional | Good |
| $20-50 | Prosumer | Viable |
| $5-20 | Consumer | Volume needed |
| <$5 | Ad-supported | **KILL** |

**KILL if:** <$20/user — not worth the effort for small team.

**Output:** Estimated $/user + pricing model

---

### Filter 5: Personal Interest

**Question:** Will you enjoy building this?

**Method:** AskUserQuestion — rate 1-5

```
Rate your interest in building [idea]:
1 = Meh, would do for money only
2 = Low interest
3 = Neutral
4 = Interested
5 = Excited, would build for free
```

**Why this matters:**
- Low interest = burnout in 3 months
- High interest = sustained motivation through hard times
- You'll spend 2+ years on this

**KILL if:** Score 1-2 — you'll quit before PMF.

**Output:** Score 1-5

---

### Filter 6: MVP-ability

**Question:** Can you launch in 4 weeks?

**Assessment:**

| Factor | Question | Red flag |
|--------|----------|----------|
| Tech | Existing skills or need to learn? | New stack |
| Dependencies | External APIs, partners needed? | Waiting on others |
| Content | Significant content creation? | Months of writing |
| Regulations | Legal/compliance requirements? | Licenses, approvals |
| Team | Solo or need to hire? | Can't start alone |

**Time estimates:**

| Weeks | Complexity | Verdict |
|-------|------------|---------|
| 1-2 | Solo, existing skills | Best |
| 2-4 | Minor learning curve | Good |
| 4-8 | Some new tech | Acceptable |
| >8 | Significant infrastructure | **KILL** |

**KILL if:** >8 weeks to MVP — too slow to validate.

**Output:** Weeks estimate + blockers

---

## Workflow

### Phase 1: Input Processing (2 min)

1. **Parse input:**
   - If `ideas`: split comma-separated list
   - If `context`: generate 5-7 ideas via WebSearch
   - If both: combine

2. **Validate count:**
   - Minimum: 3 ideas
   - Maximum: 10 ideas

3. **Create output directory:**
   ```bash
   mkdir -p docs/reference/research/
   ```

**Output:** Idea queue (3-10 items)

---

### Phase 2: KILL Funnel (per idea)

**Process each idea sequentially through all 6 filters:**

```
FOR each idea:
    Filter 1: Traffic Channel
        IF no channel → KILL, log reason, NEXT idea

    Filter 2: Existing Demand
        IF <1K/month → KILL, log reason, NEXT idea

    Filter 3: Competition
        IF Index 5 → KILL, log reason, NEXT idea

    Filter 4: Revenue
        IF <$20/user → KILL, log reason, NEXT idea

    Filter 5: Interest
        AskUserQuestion for rating
        IF score 1-2 → KILL, log reason, NEXT idea

    Filter 6: MVP-ability
        IF >8 weeks → KILL, log reason, NEXT idea

    → SURVIVOR: add to survivors list
```

**Token efficiency:**
- Process ONE idea at a time
- KILL early = less research needed
- Clear context after each idea

---

### Phase 3: Rank Survivors (2 min)

**If survivors exist:**

1. Calculate composite score:
   ```
   Score = Demand_score + (6 - Competition_index) + Revenue_score + Interest + MVP_score
   ```

2. Sort by score descending

3. Select TOP recommendation

**If no survivors:**
- Report: "All ideas killed. Rethink direction."
- Show KILL log for learning

---

### Phase 4: Output (2 min)

**Generate:** `docs/reference/research/[YYYY-MM-DD]-discovery.md`

**Structure:**

```markdown
# Opportunity Discovery: [Date]

## Summary
- Ideas analyzed: X
- Survivors: Y
- Killed: Z

## TOP RECOMMENDATION

**Idea:** [Name]
**Channel:** [Primary channel]
**Why:** [2-3 sentence rationale]

### Key metrics:
- Demand: [volume]/month
- Competition: [Index] [Ocean type]
- Revenue: $[X]/user
- MVP: [X] weeks

## Survivors Table

| Idea | Channel | Demand | Competition | Revenue | Interest | MVP | Score |
|------|---------|--------|-------------|---------|----------|-----|-------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## KILL Log

| Idea | Killed at | Reason |
|------|-----------|--------|
| ... | ... | ... |

## Next Steps
1. Create Epic with ln-210 for top recommendation
2. Focus on [channel] as primary acquisition
3. Target MVP in [X] weeks
```

---

## Time-Box

| Ideas | Estimated time |
|-------|---------------|
| 3 | 15-20 min |
| 5 | 25-35 min |
| 10 | 50-70 min |

**Note:** KILL funnel is faster than full scoring — bad ideas die early.

---

## Integration

**Position in workflow:**
```
Product exists
     ↓
ln-201 (Opportunity Discovery) ← THIS SKILL
     ↓
ln-210 (Epic Coordinator)
     ↓
ln-220 (Story Coordinator)
```

**Dependencies:**
- WebSearch (all filters except Interest)
- AskUserQuestion (Interest filter)
- Write, Bash (output)

---

## Critical Rules

1. **Traffic first** — no traffic channel = no analysis
2. **KILL immediately** — don't score dead ideas
3. **One recommendation** — avoid paralysis
4. **No surveys** — real search data only
5. **Interest matters** — you'll quit if bored
6. **MVP speed** — slow launch = slow learning

---

## Example Usage

**With ideas:**
```
ln-201-opportunity-discoverer ideas="AI writing tool, code review bot, translation API"
```

**With context:**
```
ln-201-opportunity-discoverer context="B2B developer tools SaaS"
```

**Example output:**

```markdown
# Opportunity Discovery: 2026-01-29

## TOP RECOMMENDATION

**Idea:** Code review bot
**Channel:** SEO (developers search "code review tool")
**Why:** Growing demand (15K/mo), emerging market (3 competitors),
$50/user pricing proven, can MVP in 3 weeks with existing skills.

## KILL Log

| Idea | Killed at | Reason |
|------|-----------|--------|
| AI writing | Competition | Red Ocean (25+ competitors) |
| Translation API | Revenue | Commoditized, <$10/user |
```

---

## Reference Files

| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| [filter_criteria.md](references/filter_criteria.md) | KILL thresholds for all filters |
| [channel_analysis.md](references/channel_analysis.md) | Traffic channel identification |
| [discovery_template.md](references/discovery_template.md) | Output markdown template |

- **MANDATORY READ:** `shared/references/research_tool_fallback.md`

---

**Version:** 2.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-29

Attribution

levalencialevalencia
View sourceMore from levalencia →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

494352 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

813271 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

494351 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →