Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Summary Judgment Motion

ASecurity

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.

22 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
researchgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill summary-judgment-motion --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Summary Judgment Motion?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Summary Judgment Motion
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lev-os-summary-judgment-motion/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-summary-judgment-motion)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: summary-judgment-motion
description: Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.
tags:
  - drafting
  - litigation
  - motion
---

# Motion for Summary Judgment

Produces a complete MSJ filing package showing no genuine dispute of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 56 or state equivalent.

## Prerequisites

Collect before drafting:

1. **Complaint & Answer** — all claims/defenses at issue
2. **Discovery record** — depositions, interrogatory responses, RFAs, document productions with Bates numbers
3. **Jurisdiction & local rules** — page limits, separate-statement requirements, briefing schedule, formatting
4. **Contracts/policies** — if breach or coverage claims involved
5. **Expert reports** — if needed for causation, damages, or standard of care

## Filing Package Components

### 1. Caption & Notice of Motion

Include: full court name, case title (all parties per operative pleading), case number, document title ("Motion for Summary Judgment" or "Partial"), exact claims/counts sought, FRCP 56 or state rule citation, hearing date if required, and list of supporting documents.

### 2. Memorandum of Points and Authorities

Draft in this order:

1. **Introduction** (1–2 paragraphs) — parties, claims, why MSJ is warranted
2. **Statement of the Case** — procedural history + factual background with record citations
3. **Legal Standard** — cite the trilogy plus controlling circuit/state authority:
   - *Celotex Corp. v. Catrett*, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
   - *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.*, 477 U.S. 242 (1986)
   - *Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.*, 475 U.S. 574 (1986)
4. **Argument** — per claim/defense: identify elements under governing law → map to undisputed evidence → show opponent lacks evidence for genuine dispute → address counterarguments → cite analogous MSJ grants with parentheticals
5. **Conclusion** — restate entitlement, request specific relief

### 3. Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (SUF)

Numbered paragraphs. Each fact must be a single discrete assertion, material to an element, with pinpoint citation to admissible evidence.

Citation formats:

| Type | Format |
|------|--------|
| Deposition | [Name] Dep. [page]:[line]–[line] |
| Interrogatory | [Party] Resp. to Interrog. No. [#], at [page] |
| Document | [Description], [Bates range] or Ex. [letter] |
| RFA | [Party] Resp. to RFA No. [#] |
| Declaration | [Name] Decl. ¶ [#] |

Cross-check every fact against source documents for accuracy of quotes, dates, and figures.

### 4. Supporting Declarations

Each declaration must: open with personal-knowledge/competency statement; contain only direct-knowledge facts (no conclusions, speculation, or "information and belief"); authenticate exhibits by reference; close with perjury declaration for the relevant jurisdiction.

Draft for: moving party, percipient witnesses, expert witnesses (if applicable), custodian of records.

### 5. Proposed Order

1–2 pages: grants MSJ on specified claims/counts, states no-genuine-dispute finding, directs judgment entry or identifies remaining claims (if partial), includes signature line per local rules.

### 6. Signature Block & Certifications

Attorney identification (name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email), certificate of service, word-count certification (if required), meet-and-confer certification (if required).

## Critical Checks

- **Viewing standard**: present all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, then show judgment is still compelled
- **Admissibility gate**: every cited item must be trial-admissible — authenticate documents, verify personal-knowledge basis, apply hearsay rules
- **Pinpoint citations**: never cite depositions or documents generally; always include page, line, or Bates number
- **Bluebook format**: use Bluebook unless local rules specify otherwise
- **Local rule compliance**: verify page limits, font/margins, separate-statement format, and jurisdiction-specific MSJ procedures before finalizing
- **Partial MSJ**: clearly delineate which claims are addressed vs. which remain for trial
- **PI element mapping**: for personal injury claims, map evidence to duty, breach, causation (actual + proximate), and damages — causation and damages are the most common genuine-dispute battlegrounds

Attribution

lev-oslev-os
View sourceMore from lev-os →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →