Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Summary Judgment Brief

ASecurity

Drafts FRCP 56 summary judgment motion briefs for U.S. commercial litigation. Synthesizes discovery evidence with controlling authority to show no genuine dispute of material fact. Use when drafting MSJ briefs, dispositive motions, or partial summary judgment papers post-discovery.

22 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
research

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill summary-judgment-brief --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Summary Judgment Brief?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Summary Judgment Brief
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lev-os-summary-judgment-brief/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-summary-judgment-brief)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: summary-judgment-brief
description: Drafts FRCP 56 summary judgment motion briefs for U.S. commercial litigation. Synthesizes discovery evidence with controlling authority to show no genuine dispute of material fact. Use when drafting MSJ briefs, dispositive motions, or partial summary judgment papers post-discovery.
tags:
  - brief
  - drafting
  - litigation
---

# Summary Judgment Motion Brief

Draft a dispositive motion demonstrating entitlement to judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 56 or state equivalent.

## Prerequisites

Before drafting, confirm:

1. **Discovery record** — depositions, interrogatory answers, RFAs, document productions
2. **Claims/defenses targeted** — which counts or affirmative defenses the motion addresses
3. **Controlling authority** — binding precedent on substantive elements and SJ standard
4. **Local rules** — page limits, separate statement requirements, combined vs. separate motion/brief
5. **Party role** — plaintiff (proving all elements undisputed) or defendant (negating an element)

## Brief Structure

### 1. Caption

Include court (with division), full case title, case number, and document title per local rule formatting. Check whether jurisdiction requires separate notice of motion.

### 2. Introduction (2–3 paragraphs)

- Identify moving party and claims/defenses at issue
- Preview key undisputed facts material to disposition
- State why judgment as a matter of law follows
- Frame: no reasonable jury could find for non-movant on this record

### 3. Statement of Undisputed Material Facts

Number each fact separately with record citations:

```
1. [Objective fact — no argument or conclusions].
   (Ex. A, Smith Dep. 45:12–46:3; Ex. B, Invoice dated 3/15/2024.)

2. [Next fact...]
   (Jones Decl. ¶ 7; RFA No. 12, admitted.)
```

Rules:
- Every fact cited to admissible evidence (deposition page:line, declaration ¶, exhibit, RFA)
- Only material facts — no background filler
- Objective language only
- Organize chronologically or by element

### 4. Legal Standard

Cover these components:

| Component | Content |
|-----------|---------|
| Rule | FRCP 56(a) or state equivalent |
| Movant's burden | Demonstrate absence of genuine dispute — *Celotex Corp. v. Catrett*, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) |
| Burden shift | Non-movant must show specific facts creating genuine issue — *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby*, 477 U.S. 242 (1986) |
| Viewing standard | Light most favorable to non-movant — *Matsushita Elec. v. Zenith Radio*, 475 U.S. 574 (1986) |

Add substantive standards for the specific claims/defenses at issue.

### 5. Argument

Structure by claim, defense, or element:

```
I. [CLAIM/DEFENSE] FAILS BECAUSE [ELEMENT] IS UNDISPUTED

   A. Legal Rule — controlling statute + binding case law on elements
   B. Application — map numbered facts to each element
   C. Preemptive Rebuttal — anticipate opposition, distinguish unfavorable cases
```

- Each element: rule → fact application → conclusion
- Binding precedent first; persuasive authority supplemental
- Distinguish (don't ignore) unfavorable cases
- Tone: measured, confident — "reasonable minds could not differ"
- Cross-reference numbered undisputed facts throughout

### 6. Conclusion

Synthesize key points in 1–2 paragraphs. No new arguments or facts.

### 7. Prayer for Relief

- Specify scope: all claims or identified counts only
- Dismissal with prejudice where applicable
- Costs/fees if authorized by statute, contract, or rule
- Include catch-all: "such other relief as the Court deems just"

### 8. Signature Block & Certificate of Service

- Attorney name, bar number, firm, contact, designation per local rule
- Certificate: method (ECF/email/mail), date, all served parties/counsel

## Pitfalls

- **Unsupported assertions** — every factual statement needs a record cite; every legal proposition needs authority
- **Orphan facts** — facts section, argument, and prayer must align; no facts without argument use
- **Citation format** — Bluebook unless local rules specify otherwise
- **Partial SJ scope** — if fewer than all claims, delineate scope in intro, argument, and prayer
- **Page/word limits** — confirm and comply with local rules before finalizing
- **Exhibit consistency** — reference by letter/number uniformly; confirm all cited evidence is in the record
- **Strategic framing** — defendant: target weakest plaintiff element; plaintiff: lead with strongest undisputed evidence

Attribution

lev-oslev-os
View sourceMore from lev-os →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →